Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933#discussion_r101911156
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CollapseRepartitionSuite.scala
---
@@ -43,15 +55,44 @@ class
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16988
[SPARK-19658] [SQL] Set NumPartitions of RepartitionByExpression In Analyzer
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, if `NumPartitions` is not set in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73124 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73124/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
[WIP][SPARK-][SS] FileSource read from FileSink
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r101910249
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ class CSVFileFormat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73123/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73123/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101909627
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,4 +60,26 @@ object JacksonUtils {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101909598
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,4 +60,26 @@ object JacksonUtils {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101909847
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,4 +60,26 @@ object JacksonUtils {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981#discussion_r101909916
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -482,6 +482,15 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73122/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73122/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73123/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
@gatorsmile I have test all the cases above updated. The result shows that
spark for datasource table with HiveExternalCatalog and InMemoryCatatlog
have the same actions.
spark for hive
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101908155
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101908105
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73122/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73121/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73121 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73121/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73120/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73120/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73119/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73119/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
@hvanhovell : This is as per our discussion in the jira :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19122
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73118/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985#discussion_r101905768
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73117/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73118/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
**[Test build #73117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73117/testReport)**
for PR 16979 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73121/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73120/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73119/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73116/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73116/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user moutai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16903
Thanks,
Yes I think the rest of the messages look fine on this file.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73118 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73118/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73115/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73115 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73115/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
**[Test build #73117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73117/testReport)**
for PR 16979 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #73116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73116/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73114/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73114 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73114/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73112/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73112 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73112/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73111/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73111 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73111/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73115 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73115/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73113/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73113 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73113/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73110/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73110 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73110/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16983
LGTM if the build finishes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73114 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73114/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73113 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73113/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
GitHub user michalsenkyr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986
[SPARK-18891][SQL] Support for Map collection types
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add support for arbitrary Scala `Map` types in deserialization as well as a
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16845
Let's see if I can ask Jenkins to test or if I need to get another list
updates for that. Jenkins ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dgingrich commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16845
Another alternate is to use [`six`](https://pythonhosted.org/six/). In the
standard library `text_type`) works:
```python
# Python2.6
>>> import six
>>>
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101899726
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,539 @@
+/*
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r101899620
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,539 @@
+/*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #73112 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73112/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
[WIP] [SPARK-19122][SQL] Unnecessary shuffle+sort added if join predicates
ordering differ from bucketing and sorting order
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
WIP
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73111 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73111/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16623
Thanks for cc'ing me on this - I think @jkbradley has a good point that we
should be a bit more explicit in discussing when / why we backport changes in
SparkR. While we have not declared it a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73109/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
@hvanhovell, @zsxwing and @marmbrus, I just updated and rebased. Could you
take another look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
**[Test build #73109 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73109/testReport)**
for PR 16928 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73110 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73110/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16845
Yea, I think she is meant to decide this :).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dgingrich commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16845
IMO the helper is better since the Exception message is controlled by the
user. I thought Holden was +1'ing the problem (not handling unicode) but
re-reading he might have been +1'ing that it
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73107/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16981
**[Test build #73107 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73107/testReport)**
for PR 16981 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
**[Test build #73109 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73109/testReport)**
for PR 16928 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8384
Thank you @paberline.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171#discussion_r101896246
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/wrapper.py ---
@@ -20,12 +20,14 @@
if sys.version >= '3':
xrange = range
+from pyspark import since,
Github user paberline closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8384
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user paberline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8384
Closing as requested due to this feature being too narrow a use case for
core Spark.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16609#discussion_r101895951
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -2169,9 +2169,7 @@ def name(self):
"""
Return the name of this RDD.
"""
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
@davies and @holdenk, what do you think about this change? I am fine if we
can't decide it is worth for now. I can close this if any of you is not
confident of this change.
---
If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16845
BTW, could anyone say "ok to test"? Anyhow it is true that `Exception` does
not have `message` in Python 3 and we need a fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
