Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17060
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17060
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056#discussion_r103097875
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HashExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -371,6 +370,48 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056#discussion_r103097851
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HashExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -371,6 +370,48 @@ class
Github user eyalzit commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991#discussion_r103097765
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -133,6 +133,93 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73478/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73478 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73478/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73481 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73481/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071#discussion_r103097204
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/JavaMetastoreDataSourcesSuite.java
---
@@ -26,22 +26,17 @@
import
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071#discussion_r103097195
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071#discussion_r103097192
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071#discussion_r103097154
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/SQLDataSourceExample.scala
---
@@ -135,10 +138,10 @@ object SQLDataSourceExample {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73480 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73480/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73480/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065
@ron8hu can you fix
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065#discussion_r103087483 and
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065#discussion_r103073122 if you have
time? thanks!
---
If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065
thanks for the review, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065#discussion_r103097107
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -95,15 +84,16 @@ case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73480 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73480/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
I haven't checked the tests. Maybe, let me wait for the test results before
cc'ing someone.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072#discussion_r103097032
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ public void writeTo(ByteBuffer buffer) {
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
[MINOR][BUILD] Fix lint-java breaks in Java
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix the lint-breaks as below:
```
[ERROR]
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Thank you for working on this! I like the coverage of qualified column
names.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Uh. Forgot one more point.
Could you move these test cases to our new end-to-end SQL query suite into
`SQLQueryTestSuite` ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
**[Test build #73479 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73479/testReport)**
for PR 17067 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Some test cases are negative; some test cases are expected to be supported.
Could you split them from the positive test cases? Now some test cases are
pretty large.
---
If your project is set
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17069
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17069
LGTM, merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056#discussion_r103096516
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HashExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -371,6 +370,48 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73477/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73477 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73477/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17039
@hvanhovell I made a try and just realized it might be hard to
automatically detect whether it is a complete sort and respect the predefined
sort order. The order by clauses could be complex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73478 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73478/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Let me please cc both @cloud-fan and @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
[SPARK-15615][SQL][BUILD][FOLLOW-UP] Remove deprecated usage of
json(RDD[String]) API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to replace the deprecated
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73475/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73475 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73475/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73476/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
**[Test build #73476 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73476/testReport)**
for PR 17070 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73474/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73474 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73474/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user gf53520 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16980
@uncleGen The JIRA ID is 19617. But JIRA 19677 is same problem with this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73477 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73477/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17061
cc @cloud-fan @yhuai @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Hi @marmbrus, @brkyvz and @hvanhovell, I think it is ready for a review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17048
LGTM
Merging with branch-2.1
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
**[Test build #73476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73476/testReport)**
for PR 17070 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
[WIP][SS] Good error message for version mismatch in log files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73475 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73475/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73474 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73474/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17069
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73473/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17069
**[Test build #73473 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73473/testReport)**
for PR 17069 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17069
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Sorry for my absence from recent conversation!
I agree there is no clear answer for handling input and output schema.
Some options:
* Option 1: same as RDD/GraphX-based API
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17062
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73472/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17062
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17062
**[Test build #73472 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73472/testReport)**
for PR 17062 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938#discussion_r103093504
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala
---
@@ -97,61 +98,46 @@ case class
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938#discussion_r103093397
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17069
**[Test build #73473 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73473/testReport)**
for PR 17069 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17069
CC @actuaryzhang @yanboliang Just noticed that the default is missing in
the Scaladoc.
(Thanks btw for adding Tweedie support!)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17069
[MINOR][ML][DOC] Document default value for
GeneralizedLinearRegression.linkPower
Add Scaladoc for GeneralizedLinearRegression.linkPower default value
Follow-up to
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
cc @gatorsmile @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17062
**[Test build #73472 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73472/testReport)**
for PR 17062 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17068
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17062
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
@cloud-fan @gatorsmile : can you please review this PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user wojtek-szymanski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17068
[SPARK-19709][SQL] Read empty file with CSV data source
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bugfix for reading empty file with CSV data source. Instead of throwing
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793
> I think (and I could be wrong) that @nchammas was suggesting it might
make sense to have some more tests with dict, not that the other additional new
tests are bad.
I am like Python -
GitHub user skambha opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
[SPARK-19602][SQL][TESTS] Add tests for qualified column names
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add tests covering different scenarios with qualified column names
without
Github user aramesh117 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17024
@mridulm I've added a new commit. Thank you for the review! :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065#discussion_r103090517
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -361,57 +343,52 @@ case
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793#discussion_r103089544
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1307,43 +1307,66 @@ def replace(self, to_replace, value, subset=None):
|null| null|null|
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793#discussion_r103089653
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1307,43 +1307,66 @@ def replace(self, to_replace, value, subset=None):
|null| null|null|
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16793#discussion_r103089704
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1591,6 +1591,67 @@ def test_replace(self):
self.assertEqual(row.age, 10)
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13072
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13072
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17010
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17010
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73471/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065
**[Test build #73471 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73471/testReport)**
for PR 17065 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14601
1. It's good to have some tests
2. I note that `appendS3AndSparkHadoopConfigurations()` has a weakness in
how it propagates env vars: no propagation of the session environment
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16990
LGTM, though you'd have to go do the full coverage to verify that there's
not a typo in any of the strings. This is why although Spark has adopted the
more readable inline strings, I'm more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17061
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17061
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73470/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065#discussion_r103087483
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -95,15 +84,16 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17061
**[Test build #73470 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73470/testReport)**
for PR 17061 at commit
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17065#discussion_r103087345
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -297,6 +278,8 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73468/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #73468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73468/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
