Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172#discussion_r105103962
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/objects.scala ---
@@ -219,7 +219,33 @@ case class MapElementsExec(
override def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
**[Test build #74249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74249/testReport)**
for PR 17172 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172#discussion_r105103907
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/objects.scala ---
@@ -219,7 +219,33 @@ case class MapElementsExec(
override def
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175#discussion_r105103474
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -78,9 +78,42 @@ case class ProjectExec(projectList:
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
One other change I could make is to change `variancePower` and `linkPower`
to `var.power` and `link.power` to be consistent with `statmod`. But l would
like to get your feedback on this new
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541
is it a performance improvement? there is no difference in the benchmark
results
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74243/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #74243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74243/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175#discussion_r105102645
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -78,9 +78,42 @@ case class ProjectExec(projectList:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175#discussion_r105102603
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -78,9 +78,42 @@ case class ProjectExec(projectList:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17223#discussion_r105102457
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -793,6 +794,20 @@ private[spark] class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175#discussion_r105102081
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala
---
@@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ object Canonicalize extends {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175#discussion_r105101933
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala
---
@@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ object Canonicalize extends {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r105101799
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1339,6 +1339,11 @@ test_that("column functions", {
expect_equal(collect(select(df,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17186
**[Test build #74248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74248/testReport)**
for PR 17186 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17223
**[Test build #74247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74247/testReport)**
for PR 17223 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17223
[SPARK-19881][SQL] Support Dynamic Partition Inserts params with SET command
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since Spark 2.0.0, `SET` commands do not pass the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17221
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17222
**[Test build #74246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74246/testReport)**
for PR 17222 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17221
Thanks! LGTM. Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17222
[SPARK-19439][PYSPARK][SQL] PySpark's registerJavaFunction Should Support
UDAFs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support register Java UDAFs in PySpark so that user can
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17217
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628#discussion_r105032243
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -153,6 +153,86 @@ sealed trait Matrix extends Serializable {
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628#discussion_r105068149
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -153,6 +153,86 @@ sealed trait Matrix extends Serializable {
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628#discussion_r87668326
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -153,6 +153,86 @@ sealed trait Matrix extends Serializable {
*/
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628#discussion_r87669463
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -153,6 +153,86 @@ sealed trait Matrix extends Serializable {
*/
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17217
Thanks! Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16592
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16592
great work! merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16592#discussion_r105098789
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SQLTestUtils.scala ---
@@ -306,6 +306,11 @@ private[sql] trait SQLTestUtils
val fs =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
**[Test build #74245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74245/testReport)**
for PR 17120 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16592#discussion_r105097838
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -115,6 +229,11 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r105097834
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1339,6 +1339,11 @@ test_that("column functions", {
expect_equal(collect(select(df,
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17194
@ptkool Please help the title to include the JIRA Id so that it can be
linked to jira automatically.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120#discussion_r105097597
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -79,9 +81,16 @@ class FileStreamSource(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174#discussion_r105097503
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -324,14 +324,22 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #74243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74243/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74244/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Sure - it's a single columns called `features` so I'm fine with it as a
parameter.
I'm not sure about `inputCol` though, it's a different nomenclature in R
that is different from the rest
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16933
awesome!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user zdove commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
Thank you for your reply.
I consider that the code you have changed don't involve about SparkConf. If
you don't change the default SparkConf file then Spark will not recognize the
parameter
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
oh, the PR description is not correct now. Can you update it too?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #74242 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74242/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74242/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178#discussion_r105095002
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1342,28 +1342,52 @@ test_that("column functions", {
df <- read.json(mapTypeJsonPath)
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r105094904
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -674,6 +675,24 @@ object SQLConf {
.stringConf
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120#discussion_r105094841
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -79,9 +81,16 @@ class FileStreamSource(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
**[Test build #74240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74240/testReport)**
for PR 17200 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #74242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74242/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
**[Test build #74241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74241/testReport)**
for PR 16909 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
@felixcheung OK, new implementation of # 3. Now works in two ways:
1. `family = "tweedie"` + `variancePower` + `linkPower`
2. When `statmod` is available, `tweedie()`
Please
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
LGTM except for a minor comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r105093717
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/window/WindowFunctionFrame.scala
---
@@ -164,9 +176,12 @@ private[window] final class
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r105093397
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/window/WindowFunctionFrame.scala
---
@@ -341,25 +364,27 @@ private[window] final
Github user f7753 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
@tgravescs Sorry for so late to reply, I am really sorry for that.
I haven't use external shuffle, I need to rebase the code to recent
release and retest it. Iâll rebase it on executor
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
Btw, since it is a change to SQL code. Better to add `[SQL]` to the title.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17207
ok, great, could you update PR title and JIRA title then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200#discussion_r105094257
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/EvaluatePython.scala
---
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ object EvaluatePython {
case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
**[Test build #74239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74239/testReport)**
for PR 17200 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74239/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200
**[Test build #74239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74239/testReport)**
for PR 17200 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74238/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
**[Test build #74238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74238/testReport)**
for PR 17141 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74235/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74235/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17221
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user f7753 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
@zdove please refer to `org.apache.spark.SparkConf`, spark load all
parameter you set on the file spark-defaults by scripts when JVM process start
and filter those contains "spark", then add them to
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r105089766
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,340 @@ package
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r105089751
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -389,6 +389,18 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r105089699
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ object
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r105089676
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -257,3 +258,28 @@ object PhysicalAggregation {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74236/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
**[Test build #74236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74236/testReport)**
for PR 17120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74234/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
**[Test build #74234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74234/testReport)**
for PR 17113 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15229
@carlos-verdes : Thanks for the information. This is moved under an
umbrella jira (SPARK-19256) which has a proposal :
Github user tejasapatil closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15229
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17138
CBO should be part of planning, right? The result of CBO should be
executable plans. IMO, all the CBO rules should be moved the planner. The
current optimizer is just rule-based.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17221
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74233/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17221
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17221
**[Test build #74233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74233/testReport)**
for PR 17221 at commit
Github user JasonMWhite commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17200#discussion_r105083494
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ def toInternal(self, dt):
if dt is not None:
seconds =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74237/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
**[Test build #74237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74237/testReport)**
for PR 17209 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17189#discussion_r105081718
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/Worker.scala
---
@@ -577,13 +582,17 @@ private[deploy] class Worker(
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
**[Test build #74237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74237/testReport)**
for PR 17209 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17141
**[Test build #74238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74238/testReport)**
for PR 17141 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17216#discussion_r105081023
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/OffsetSeq.scala
---
@@ -71,7 +71,10 @@ object OffsetSeq {
* @param
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
**[Test build #74236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74236/testReport)**
for PR 17120 at commit
1 - 100 of 533 matches
Mail list logo
