Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17264
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17264
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74396/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17264
**[Test build #74396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74396/testReport)**
for PR 17264 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
**[Test build #74395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74395/testReport)**
for PR 17232 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74395/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17264
I quickly did check performance changes;
```
public class TestGenericUDF extends GenericUDF {
@Override
public ObjectInspector initialize(ObjectInspector[] objectInspectors)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17264
**[Test build #74396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74396/testReport)**
for PR 17264 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17264
I'm not sure this makes sense, so could you check? cc: @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17264
[SPARK-19923][SQL] Remove unnecessary type conversions per call in Hive
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr removed unnecessary type conversions per call in Hive:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
**[Test build #74395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74395/testReport)**
for PR 17232 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17260
cc @cloud-fan @yhuai @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r105548957
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2897,6 +2898,27 @@ test_that("Collect on DataFrame when NAs exists at
the top of a timestamp
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
To show the impact of `boolean hasFollowingStatsTask`, we need to deliver
the fix in `VersionSuite.scala` at first. The PR has been submitted:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17260
---
If
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232#discussion_r105548919
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ private[spark] class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105548820
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -606,6 +607,36 @@ class KafkaSourceSuite
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105548818
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -606,6 +607,36 @@ class KafkaSourceSuite
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105548819
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -606,6 +607,36 @@ class KafkaSourceSuite
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105548749
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -128,18 +123,18 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105548762
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -388,34 +383,34 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105548753
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -128,18 +123,18 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105548760
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -388,34 +383,34 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74394/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
**[Test build #74394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74394/testReport)**
for PR 17263 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
**[Test build #74394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74394/testReport)**
for PR 17263 at commit
Github user yanji84 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
@mgummelt comments addressed, please take another look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
**[Test build #74393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74393/testReport)**
for PR 17263 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74393/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17258
Thanks, I like this change but I think the reason string could be simpler,
like `"killed via the Web UI"`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
**[Test build #74393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74393/testReport)**
for PR 17263 at commit
GitHub user Krimit opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17263
[SPARK-19922][ML] small speedups to findSynonyms
Currently generating synonyms using a large model (I've tested with 3m
words) is very slow. These efficiencies have sped things up for us by ~17%
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74392/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
**[Test build #74392 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74392/testReport)**
for PR 17109 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
**[Test build #74392 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74392/testReport)**
for PR 17109 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r105546348
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2897,6 +2898,27 @@ test_that("Collect on DataFrame when NAs exists at
the top of a
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r105545762
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2897,6 +2898,27 @@ test_that("Collect on DataFrame when NAs exists at
the top of a
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r105545724
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RRDD.scala ---
@@ -127,6 +127,13 @@ private[r] object RRDD {
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r105545712
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2897,6 +2898,27 @@ test_that("Collect on DataFrame when NAs exists at
the top of a
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r105545530
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2897,6 +2898,27 @@ test_that("Collect on DataFrame when NAs exists at
the top of a timestamp
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r105545521
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RRDD.scala ---
@@ -127,6 +127,13 @@ private[r] object RRDD {
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r105545556
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2897,6 +2898,27 @@ test_that("Collect on DataFrame when NAs exists at
the top of a timestamp
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
@felixcheung Any update on this ? Looking through the list of PRs I thought
this might be a good one to add to a CRAN submission
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74391/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #74391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74391/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17260
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17260
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74389/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17260
**[Test build #74389 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74389/testReport)**
for PR 17260 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74388/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17171
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #74388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74388/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17171
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74390/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17171
**[Test build #74390 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74390/testReport)**
for PR 17171 at commit
Github user elviento commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17262
closed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user elviento closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17262
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17262
@elviento this pull request is completely wrong. Close it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user elviento commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17262
it merges into branch-2.0 - added missing bracket in DataFrameSuite.scala
line 1704.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17262
@elviento close this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user elviento closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17261
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17262
Can you close it please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17262
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user elviento opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17262
[SPARK-17261][SQL] Fixed missing closing bracket
spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed missing closing bracket in branch-2.0 line:1704
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17261
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user elviento opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17261
Branch 2.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed missing closing bracket in branch-2.0 line:1704 of
DataFrameSuite.scala which was found during
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #74391 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74391/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17260
**[Test build #74389 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74389/testReport)**
for PR 17260 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17171
**[Test build #74390 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74390/testReport)**
for PR 17171 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16373
Will review this today. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17171
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17260
[SPARK-19921] [SQL] [TEST] Enable end-to-end testing using different Hive
metastore versions.
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To improve the quality of our Spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #74388 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74388/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user elviento closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17259
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user elviento opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17259
Branch 2.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Missing closing bracket '}' line 1704 found during mvn build.
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
Github user omuravskiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16006
Yes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17258
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user shaolinliu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17258
[SPARK-19807][Web UI]Add reason for cancellation when a stage is killed
using web UI
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When a user kills a stage using web UI (in
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
@cloud-fan I would like to defer the optimization part to another PR, if
possible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17257
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74387/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17257
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17257
**[Test build #74387 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74387/testReport)**
for PR 17257 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74385/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #74385 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74385/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74384/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
**[Test build #74384 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74384/testReport)**
for PR 17254 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74386/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
**[Test build #74386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74386/testReport)**
for PR 17256 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Done. cc @sethah @jkbradley thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17257
**[Test build #74387 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74387/testReport)**
for PR 17257 at commit
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17257
[DOCS][SS] fix structured streaming python example
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- SS python example: `TypeError: 'xxx' object is not callable`
- some other doc
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
**[Test build #74386 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74386/testReport)**
for PR 17256 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
cc @cloud-fan, @joshrosen and @NathanHowell could you take a look and see
if it makes sense when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
