Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74711 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74711/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74712/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74712 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74712/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17319
thanks, merging to 2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74712/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74711/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
It's kind of weird if we have both "group by ordinal" feature and this
"group by alias" feature, shall we only pick one of them?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
**[Test build #74710 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74710/testReport)**
for PR 17088 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74698/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74698 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74698/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499#discussion_r106573530
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1048,7 +1065,7 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
try
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
@marmbrus, could you please take a look at this PR for fixing a problem?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #74709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74709/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17328
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74701/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
**[Test build #74701 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74701/testReport)**
for PR 17320 at commit
GitHub user yongtang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17328
[SPARK-19975][Python][SQL] Add map_keys and map_values functions to Python
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fix tries to address the issue in SPARK-19975 where we
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
@jkbradley Could you please to make a pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
ping @hhbyyh ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74700/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74700/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17095
I suspect that this PR is the cause of consistent failures in the maven
build, in the HiveCatalogedDDLSuite unit test:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17216
**[Test build #74708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74708/testReport)**
for PR 17216 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17314
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ehsun7b commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17314
I updated the title and provided more details about the change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user ehsun7b reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17314
Fix for JIRA ticket SPARK-15790
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is the partial fix for this JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15790
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17216
LGTM. Will merge after tests pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74707 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74707/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
**[Test build #74706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74706/testReport)**
for PR 17320 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287#discussion_r106570569
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,41 +27,67 @@ import
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320#discussion_r106570477
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -220,4 +220,39 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74705/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287#discussion_r106570185
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,41 +27,67 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106570171
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ private[sql] class JSONOptions(
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287#discussion_r106569991
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,41 +27,67 @@ import
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287#discussion_r106569958
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,41 +27,67 @@ import
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106569878
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -61,25 +65,50 @@ import
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106569867
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -61,25 +65,50 @@ import
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
I'll add a config soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
@zsxwing sure, please see https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17327
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17327
**[Test build #74704 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74704/testReport)**
for PR 17327 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17327
[SPARK-19721][SS][BRANCH-2.1] Good error message for version mismatch in
log files
## Problem
There are several places where we write out version identifiers in various
logs for
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287
a late LGTM :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #74703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74703/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971#discussion_r106569149
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/QuantileSummariesSuite.scala
---
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74702/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test failure seems unrelated. jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971#discussion_r106569064
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/ApproximatePercentile.scala
---
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ object
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287#discussion_r106568913
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,41 +27,67 @@ import
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287#discussion_r106568853
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,41 +27,67 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287#discussion_r106568674
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,41 +27,67 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74696/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74697/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
**[Test build #74696 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74696/testReport)**
for PR 17322 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74697 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74697/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106568435
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -61,25 +65,50 @@ import
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106568427
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/KeyedStateTimeout.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106568386
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -92,27 +121,33 @@ import
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106568279
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/KeyedStateImpl.scala
---
@@ -60,6 +82,45 @@ private[sql] class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106567525
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1802,10 +1802,10 @@ def from_json(col, schema, options={}):
@since(2.1)
def to_json(col,
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106567845
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonGenerator.scala
---
@@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ private[sql] class JacksonGenerator(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106566917
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -589,52 +591,69 @@ case class StructToJson(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106567643
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1802,10 +1802,10 @@ def from_json(col, schema, options={}):
@since(2.1)
def to_json(col,
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106567410
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320#discussion_r106568036
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -220,4 +220,39 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r106567583
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -1795,10 +1795,10 @@ setMethod("to_date",
#' to_json
#'
-#' Converts a column containing a
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
okay, I'll test more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
**[Test build #74701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74701/testReport)**
for PR 17320 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74694/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106567105
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FlatMapGroupsWithStateExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
**[Test build #74694 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74694/testReport)**
for PR 17088 at commit
Github user jianran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17313
I am sorry,you are right, the second assertion is ok; but what do you think
about the assertion comment:_Do a get() on rdd_0_2 so that it is the most
recently used item_, what is the purpose of the
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Please hold on merging this until
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17321 is resolved.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320#discussion_r106566646
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -634,7 +661,12 @@ case class StructToJson(
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320#discussion_r106566472
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -202,12 +202,12 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106566487
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStore.scala
---
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ trait StateStore {
/** Get the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315#discussion_r106566183
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -391,9 +288,9 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106566096
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -361,18 +435,20 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V] private[sql](
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106566078
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -284,6 +322,38 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V] private[sql](
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106566062
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -249,6 +250,43 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V] private[sql](
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r106566088
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -298,12 +368,14 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V] private[sql](
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74700/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
**[Test build #74699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74699/testReport)**
for PR 17307 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74692/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
**[Test build #74692 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74692/testReport)**
for PR 17307 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
LGTM pending Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
It sounds like all the comments have been addressed.
LGTM except one minor comment. cc @sameeragarwal @cloud-fan @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74698 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74698/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106562261
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ object ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins
101 - 200 of 598 matches
Mail list logo
