Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
The code changes are now very specific to R. Let me know if you still need
me. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17110
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17110
OK merging with master
Thanks @imatiach-msft and @thunterdb !
@imatiach-msft I agree about sparse testing. This has all of the MLlib
tests, but we should add more in the
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17326
ping @jkbradley @MLnick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
@thunterdb The extra step -- as implemented -- is only at the end as that
gives the same result as doing it after every iteration but without the extra
overhead.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17326
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17326
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74695/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r106558961
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17326
**[Test build #74695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74695/testReport)**
for PR 17326 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
@squito FYI I filed a JIRA for the 2nd of the two unit tests that failed in
that run (looks like you'd already filed a JIRA for the first one)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16781
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16781
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74688/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16781
**[Test build #74688 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74688/testReport)**
for PR 16781 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Made the change to improve the default reason, which now says "killed via
SparkContext.killTaskAttempt".
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74697 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74697/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r106555744
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -710,7 +710,11 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r106555729
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -2250,6 +2250,22 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging {
}
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r106555639
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -2250,6 +2250,22 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
cc @cloud-fan and @mambrus, do you mind if I ask to take a look here? I
guess this is an important ix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
**[Test build #74696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74696/testReport)**
for PR 17322 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
@viirya A month has gone by since my last update. I've added much more
comprehensive coverage to the `SelectedFieldSuite`, however I haven't yet fixed
the `SelectedField` extractor to pass all of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
**[Test build #74690 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74690/testReport)**
for PR 17324 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74690/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17296
@MLnick , I found an existing `MLTestingUtils.checkCopy` that is used to
check the copied model uids match and can easily be extended to include the
check needed here. I went through and added
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74689/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
**[Test build #74689 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74689/testReport)**
for PR 17324 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
I support this idea. Let me try to take a close look within tomorrow to
help.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17326
**[Test build #74695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74695/testReport)**
for PR 17326 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
All the valid examples are using a single column. Could you also add a test
case to verify the schema having multiple columns? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499#discussion_r106552361
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1048,7 +1065,7 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
try {
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17326
[SPARK-19985][ML] Fixed copy method for some ML Models
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some ML Models were using `defaultCopy` which expects a default
constructor, and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
**[Test build #74694 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74694/testReport)**
for PR 17088 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74687/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
**[Test build #74687 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74687/testReport)**
for PR 17322 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74685/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74685/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320#discussion_r106550987
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -202,12 +202,12 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320#discussion_r106550986
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -202,12 +202,12 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
**[Test build #74693 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74693/testReport)**
for PR 16483 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74693/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320#discussion_r106550372
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -634,7 +661,12 @@ case class StructToJson(
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
@gatorsmile I like the DDL schema format approach. But the method
`CatalystSqlParser.parseTableSchema(sql)` will work only if user wants to
specify the target database datatype that also
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
**[Test build #74693 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74693/testReport)**
for PR 16483 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17325
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
**[Test build #74692 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74692/testReport)**
for PR 17307 at commit
GitHub user shubhamchopra opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17325
[SPARK-19803][CORE][TEST] Proactive replication test failures
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Executors cache a list of their peers that is refreshed by default every
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
yeah, sorry I am looking, but keep getting distracted ... I'm sure these
failures don't matter but can't merge this second anyhow so lets just test
again ...
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17319
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user aray commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483#discussion_r106548090
--- Diff:
graphx/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/PageRankSuite.scala ---
@@ -68,26 +69,34 @@ class PageRankSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
The tests passes on my laptop, so looks like we have more flaky tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74691/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
**[Test build #74691 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74691/testReport)**
for PR 17088 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088#discussion_r106546928
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -394,6 +394,32 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088#discussion_r106546818
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1365,19 +1369,27 @@ class DAGScheduler(
*/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
**[Test build #74691 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74691/testReport)**
for PR 17088 at commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088#discussion_r106546591
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1331,7 +1328,14 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// TODO:
Github user aray commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483#discussion_r106546448
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/PageRank.scala
---
@@ -322,13 +335,12 @@ object PageRank extends Logging {
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
**[Test build #74690 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74690/testReport)**
for PR 17324 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
**[Test build #74689 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74689/testReport)**
for PR 17324 at commit
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
[SPARK-19969] [ML] Imputer doc and example
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add docs and examples for spark.ml.feature.Imputer. Currently scala and
Java examples are
Github user windpiger closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17317
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17284
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Thinking about this more, this seems like two separate changes (that should
probably be separated):
(1) Allowing cancellations to be injected via SparkContext. This seems
like it
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r106540691
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -836,17 +836,29 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74686/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17323
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17323
**[Test build #74686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74686/testReport)**
for PR 17323 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17323
cc @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16781
**[Test build #74688 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74688/testReport)**
for PR 16781 at commit
Github user thunterdb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483
In addition, this introduces an extra step reduction at each iteration. I
am fine with that since it is for correctness, but @jkbradley may want to
comment as well.
---
If your project is set
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17323
**[Test build #74686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74686/testReport)**
for PR 17323 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
**[Test build #74687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74687/testReport)**
for PR 17322 at commit
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483#discussion_r106529377
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/PageRank.scala
---
@@ -353,9 +365,19 @@ object PageRank extends Logging {
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483#discussion_r106532078
--- Diff:
graphx/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/PageRankSuite.scala ---
@@ -68,26 +69,34 @@ class PageRankSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483#discussion_r106535595
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/PageRank.scala
---
@@ -322,13 +335,12 @@ object PageRank extends Logging {
def
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17323
[SPARK-19986][Tests]Make pyspark.streaming.tests.CheckpointTests more stable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Sometimes, CheckpointTests will hang on a busy machine
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17322
[SPARK-19987][SQL] Pass all filters into FileIndex
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a tiny teeny refactoring to pass data filters also to the
FileIndex, so FileIndex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #3601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3601/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74682/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
**[Test build #74682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74682/testReport)**
for PR 17320 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74683/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
**[Test build #74683 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74683/testReport)**
for PR 17307 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
@jkbradley can you take a look? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74679/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74679/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16483#discussion_r106528007
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/PageRank.scala
---
@@ -162,7 +162,15 @@ object PageRank extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
**[Test build #74685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74685/testReport)**
for PR 15363 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17319
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17319
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74678/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17319
**[Test build #74678 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74678/testReport)**
for PR 17319 at commit
201 - 300 of 598 matches
Mail list logo
