Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17321
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74684/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17321
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17321
**[Test build #74684 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74684/testReport)**
for PR 17321 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
@lw-lin there are conflicts with 2.1. Could you submit a new PR for
branch-2.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74680/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74680/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74677/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74677 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74677/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74681/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #74681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74681/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17321
**[Test build #74684 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74684/testReport)**
for PR 17321 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #3601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3601/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17321
[SPARK-19899][ML] Replace featuresCol with itemsCol in ml.fpm.FPGrowth
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replaces `featuresCol` `Param` with `itemsCol`. See
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
I personally have run into this issue and was surprised that we didn't
support it ... it's pretty verbose to retype everything.
If Postgres and MySQL both support it, I think we should do it
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307
**[Test build #74683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74683/testReport)**
for PR 17307 at commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17307#discussion_r106507130
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1506,6 +1506,11 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
**[Test build #74682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74682/testReport)**
for PR 17320 at commit
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17320
[SPARK-19967][SQL] Add from_json in FunctionRegistry
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr added entries in `FunctionRegistry` and supported `from_json` in
SQL.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #3600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3600/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user superbobry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17230
Okay, one more benchmark, 4 partitions of [Consumer Complaint
Database](https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/consumer-complaint-database), more
reallistic workload than the sonnets :)
This
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #74681 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74681/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74680/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17287
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74675/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74679 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74679/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Rebased
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #74675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74675/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
@shaneknapp I had to trigger jenkins manually via spark-prs. Every once in
a while I encounter a pr for which tests are never triggered via comments. Its
pretty rare, so its not a big deal, but I
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
We hit this issue multiple times. Although it looks not right to support it
for the users of major enterprise RDBMS, two popular open source RDBMS
PostgreSQL and MySQL support it.
This
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74674/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #74674 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74674/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17316#discussion_r106488785
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -871,6 +872,164 @@ def idf(self):
@inherit_doc
+class Imputer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCols,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17319
**[Test build #74678 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74678/testReport)**
for PR 17319 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17306
I commented on the linked JIRA also.
In principle I think this can be a useful enhancement and yes the better
efficiency on the caching side is a good benefit. I'd actually been thinking
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17319
[SPARK-19765][SPARK-18549][SPARK-19093][SPARK-19736][BACKPORT-2.1][SQL]
Backport Three Cache-related PRs to Spark 2.1
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Backport a
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17316#discussion_r106489373
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -871,6 +872,164 @@ def idf(self):
@inherit_doc
+class Imputer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCols,
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17316#discussion_r106490851
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -871,6 +872,164 @@ def idf(self):
@inherit_doc
+class Imputer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCols,
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17318
@cloud-fan This is the same fix with
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188 and could you check this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17318
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17318
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74676/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17318
**[Test build #74676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74676/testReport)**
for PR 17318 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17268
Sorry I'm still not sure if this is a good idea.
Why disallow the following,
```scala
spark
.readStream
.withWatermark("eventTime", "10 seconds")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #3600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3600/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Thanks again @kayousterhout and @squito ;)
Jenkins needs to be retriggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74677/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
@gatorsmile sure. I will update the PR with the DDL format approach.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17317
@windpiger Could you please close it? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17317
Thanks! Merging to 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74673/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #74673 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74673/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user superbobry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17230
Here're the result of piping [The Sonnets by W.
Sheakespear](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1105/pg1105.txt) via `cat`
using either `PipedRDD` or hand-patched `PipedRDD` with I/O formats.
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295
> What's the actual difference? previously we transfer encrypted data?
Yes. The previous version of the code would transfer the encrypted file
over to the receiver, and the encrypted data
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74668/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
@gatorsmile I checked;
```
// PostgreSQL v9.5
postgres=# \d t
Table "public.t"
Column | Type | Modifiers
+-+---
gkey | integer |
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
**[Test build #74668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74668/testReport)**
for PR 17274 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Please also add a test case: ALTER TABLE does not affect any view that
references the table being altered. Also includes the views that have an "*" in
their SELECT list.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17317
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74671/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17317
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106472336
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -175,6 +178,87 @@ case class AlterTableRenameCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17317
**[Test build #74671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74671/testReport)**
for PR 17317 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106472274
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -175,6 +178,87 @@ case class AlterTableRenameCommand(
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274#discussion_r106471026
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_context.R ---
@@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ test_that("add and get file to be downloaded with
Spark job on every node",
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106467740
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -350,7 +366,12 @@ $(document).ready(function () {
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106470033
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -87,8 +87,13 @@ case class
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106468328
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerSource.scala ---
@@ -26,35 +26,39 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerSource(val
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106469348
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/StorageUtils.scala
---
@@ -60,11 +63,17 @@ class StorageStatus(val blockManagerId: BlockManagerId,
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106467583
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -174,8 +174,10 @@ $(document).ready(function () {
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106467285
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage-template.html
---
@@ -24,7 +24,10 @@ Summary
RDD
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106467368
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage-template.html
---
@@ -24,7 +24,10 @@ Summary
RDD
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r106469513
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/exec/ExecutorsPage.scala
---
@@ -116,7 +121,11 @@ private[spark] object ExecutorsPage {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106467818
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -175,6 +178,87 @@ case class AlterTableRenameCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r106465419
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -175,6 +178,87 @@ case class AlterTableRenameCommand(
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16596
@shivaram the change would need to be in spark-submit & spark-submit.cmd -
that's where JAVA is resolved (and if it's not there, to empty string)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74666/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
**[Test build #74666 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74666/testReport)**
for PR 17315 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17318
**[Test build #74676 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74676/testReport)**
for PR 17318 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
@squito
Would you mind help comment on this when have time ? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17318
[SPARK-19896][SQL] Throw an exception if case classes have circular
references in toDS
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If case classes have circular references below, it
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #74675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74675/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74665/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
**[Test build #74665 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74665/testReport)**
for PR 17276 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74670/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r106453502
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/MedianHeapSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
**[Test build #74670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74670/testReport)**
for PR 17242 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r106453205
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/MedianHeapSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #74674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74674/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
301 - 400 of 598 matches
Mail list logo
