Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335
**[Test build #74946 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74946/testReport)**
for PR 17335 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335
@yaooqinn , pushed another way to fix this issue, I think hdfs folder owner
should be the right user (proxy user).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Aha, I checked and I found all of them rejected the syntax;
```
postgres=# select gkey1 AS gkey2, count(value) AS k1 from t2 group by gkey2;
ERROR: column "t2.gkey1" must appear in
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
@rxin @jerryshao @srowen
I've refined the description and uploaded the screenshot of latest version.
Please take another look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4058918/24134191/8392c5ea-0e3d-11e7-8a53-f164acf04764.png;>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353#discussion_r107077912
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -152,6 +156,10 @@ object JoinReorderDP
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547#discussion_r107077783
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impurity/ApproxBernoulliImpurity.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
**[Test build #74945 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74945/testReport)**
for PR 17353 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74928/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
**[Test build #74928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74928/testReport)**
for PR 17354 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74931/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
**[Test build #74931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74931/testReport)**
for PR 17276 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r107077129
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,37 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16906
**[Test build #74944 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74944/testReport)**
for PR 16906 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16906
Yeah, make sense. Fixed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74943/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user xwu0226 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Table `t2` also has the column named `k1`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74937/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
You mean this case?
```
postgres=# select gkey1 AS k1, gkey2 AS k2, count(value) AS k1 from t2
group by k1, k2;
ERROR: GROUP BY "k1" is ambiguous
LINE 1: ...k1, gkey2 AS k2,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74937/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
CC @thunterdb @imatiach-msft What do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74934/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
**[Test build #74934 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74934/testReport)**
for PR 17353 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
**[Test build #74942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74942/testReport)**
for PR 17368 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16906
I think we need to lowercase the conf value as in #16907
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342#discussion_r107075363
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SharedState.scala ---
@@ -148,6 +149,8 @@ private[sql] class SharedState(val
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
[SPARK-20039][ML] rename ChiSquare to ChiSquareTest
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I realized that since ChiSquare is in the package stat, it's pretty unclear
if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74926/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
**[Test build #74926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74926/testReport)**
for PR 17312 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74929/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74929/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user sachintyagi22 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17332
cc @mengxr @jkbradley -- Hi, any thoughts on this? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17108
Taking a look now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350#discussion_r107073563
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350
Also, add an end-to-end test case in string-function.sql. Update the
function description to explain when we return null.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107073269
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskEndReason.scala ---
@@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ case object TaskResultLost extends TaskFailedReason {
* Task
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74941/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17357
It's a lot better. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
When the alias in aggregation expressions has the same name as the output
of the underlying children, which one is preferred in Postgres and MySQL?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74940 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74940/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74940/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r107072663
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisErrorSuite.scala
---
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ class AnalysisErrorSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74935/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17357
@markhamstra, thanks for pointing out. Do you think the new title is okay ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
**[Test build #74935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74935/testReport)**
for PR 17014 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74940/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
**[Test build #74939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74939/testReport)**
for PR 17276 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107070165
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -467,7 +474,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107070379
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils extends Logging {
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107070457
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +540,39 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107070597
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +540,39 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
**[Test build #74938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74938/testReport)**
for PR 17276 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r107070667
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,37 @@ abstract class SubqueryExpression(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17266
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74922/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17266
thanks, merging to master/2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74922/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350
May I ask why you want to change the nullability of StringToMap?
also cc @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350#discussion_r107069733
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342#discussion_r107069396
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SharedState.scala ---
@@ -148,6 +149,8 @@ private[sql] class SharedState(val sparkContext:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17367
**[Test build #74933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74933/testReport)**
for PR 17367 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17367
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74933/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17367
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
thanks, merging to master/2.1!
@mallman can you send a new PR for 2.0? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17364
@steveloughran, maybe this is strictly not related with the problem
specified in JIRA but do you know if we should do the same thing to
`SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter`? I remember I had to fix the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74936/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74937/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r107068209
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -836,17 +836,30 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74920/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
**[Test build #74935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74935/testReport)**
for PR 17014 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
**[Test build #74920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74920/testReport)**
for PR 16209 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17361
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74919/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17361
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17361
**[Test build #74919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74919/testReport)**
for PR 17361 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r107067691
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisErrorSuite.scala
---
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ class AnalysisErrorSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17367
**[Test build #74933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74933/testReport)**
for PR 17367 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74918/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
**[Test build #74934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74934/testReport)**
for PR 17353 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17315
**[Test build #74918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74918/testReport)**
for PR 17315 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74932/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
**[Test build #74932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74932/testReport)**
for PR 17014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 635 matches
Mail list logo
