Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628
**[Test build #75083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75083/testReport)**
for PR 15628 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
**[Test build #75082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75082/testReport)**
for PR 17394 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
[SPARK-20067] [SQL] Use treeString to print out the table schema for
CatalogTable
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow what we did in Dataset API `printSchema`, we
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335
Broaden this issue a bit. Currently in driver side (client mode), issued
delegation tokens are not added into current ugi, this makes follow-up
hdfs/metastore/hbase communication still use tgt
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
**[Test build #75081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75081/testReport)**
for PR 17355 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75080/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
**[Test build #75080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75080/testReport)**
for PR 17219 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
**[Test build #75080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75080/testReport)**
for PR 17219 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75076/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
**[Test build #75076 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75076/testReport)**
for PR 17389 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342#discussion_r107583524
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2767,3 +2767,24 @@ private[spark] class CircularBuffer(sizeInBytes: Int
= 10240)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17393
**[Test build #75079 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75079/testReport)**
for PR 17393 at commit
GitHub user markgrover opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17393
[SPARK-20066] [CORE] Add explicit SecurityManager(SparkConf) constructor
for backwards compatibility with Java.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This adds an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17388
**[Test build #75078 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75078/testReport)**
for PR 17388 at commit
Github user lw-lin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17268
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17268
Thanks for the comments! Closing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75072/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #75072 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75072/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75073/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
**[Test build #75073 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75073/testReport)**
for PR 17355 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
You are so kind person.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75070/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #75070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75070/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75075/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17388
@vanzin @tgravescs @mridulm do you think it necessary to add additional
jars and main jar into classloader for yarn cluster mode?
In my class I run Spark with HBase in secure cluster, so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
**[Test build #75075 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75075/testReport)**
for PR 17392 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
no worries, I'm just not sure when to look again, with all the
notifications from your commits. Committers tend to think that something is
ready to review if its passing tests, so its helpful to add
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75069/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #75069 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75069/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75077/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
**[Test build #75077 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75077/testReport)**
for PR 17219 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
**[Test build #75077 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75077/testReport)**
for PR 17219 at commit
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17329#discussion_r107572297
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/FileSegmentManagedBuffer.java
---
@@ -37,13 +37,24 @@
* A {@link
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75068/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
**[Test build #75068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75068/testReport)**
for PR 16209 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
**[Test build #75076 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75076/testReport)**
for PR 17389 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75071/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
**[Test build #75067 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75067/testReport)**
for PR 17389 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75067/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
**[Test build #75071 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75071/testReport)**
for PR 17392 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
**[Test build #75075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75075/testReport)**
for PR 17392 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392#discussion_r107569402
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/ObjectHashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -147,9 +147,13 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
**[Test build #75074 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75074/testReport)**
for PR 17219 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75074/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
@rxin because I killed executor1 and it is not active during this stage.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
**[Test build #75074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75074/testReport)**
for PR 17219 at commit
Github user sarutak closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17252
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sarutak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17252
Thanks for the comment. I understand the concern relevant to the
consistency.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
@squito oh, I feel sorry if this is disturbing. I will mark it as wip.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75064/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #75064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75064/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75066/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
**[Test build #75066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75066/testReport)**
for PR 17379 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
**[Test build #75073 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75073/testReport)**
for PR 17355 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17387
Does kerberos authentication really work in non-yarn cluster mode? AFAIK I
don't see any code which will ship delegation tokens to executors other than
yarn.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17252
Thanks for working on this, but I think this is inconsistent with other
APIs in Spark. Also for things like the foreach sink, you might actually be
expecting the option to affect the partitioning
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75063/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355
**[Test build #75063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75063/testReport)**
for PR 17355 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17375
(I will close as soon as it gets merged and the one against branch-2.0 too)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #75072 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75072/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
**[Test build #75071 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75071/testReport)**
for PR 17392 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
LGTM pending Jenkins
cc @rxin @joshrosen @srowen
This is a nice option to have for JDBC users. If no further comment, I will
merge it to master tomorrow. Thanks!
---
If your
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17392
[SPARK-20008] [SQL] DISTINCT and EXCEPT Support on DataFrame with Zero
Columns
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
So far, our aggregate does not consider the input with
Github user sureshthalamati commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209#discussion_r107562733
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -680,19 +681,63 @@ object JdbcUtils
Github user sureshthalamati commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209#discussion_r107562849
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCWriteSuite.scala ---
@@ -362,4 +363,80 @@ class JDBCWriteSuite extends
Github user sureshthalamati commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209#discussion_r107562605
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -680,19 +681,63 @@ object JdbcUtils
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107561714
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -296,12 +298,13 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
//
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #75070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75070/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Jenkins, this is ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r107559778
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/StorageUtils.scala
---
@@ -60,11 +63,17 @@ class StorageStatus(val blockManagerId: BlockManagerId,
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r107557948
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -378,7 +394,37 @@ $(document).ready(function () {
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r107557914
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -378,7 +394,37 @@ $(document).ready(function () {
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r107557907
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -378,7 +394,37 @@ $(document).ready(function () {
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617#discussion_r107559155
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerSource.scala ---
@@ -26,35 +26,39 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerSource(val
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
LGTM. I'll merge once tests pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #75069 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75069/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107559342
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -239,14 +239,26 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107559290
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -296,12 +298,13 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
// If this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
**[Test build #75068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75068/testReport)**
for PR 16209 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628#discussion_r107557490
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -291,31 +395,60 @@ class DenseMatrix @Since("2.0.0") (
override
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17389
**[Test build #75067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75067/testReport)**
for PR 17389 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628#discussion_r107556503
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -587,18 +722,69 @@ class SparseMatrix @Since("2.0.0") (
}
1 - 100 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
