Github user yaooqinn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17430#discussion_r108094996
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ private[deploy] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17407#discussion_r108094236
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -385,6 +385,22 @@ class
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17407#discussion_r108094126
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -385,6 +385,22 @@ class
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17407#discussion_r108094114
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -178,6 +178,22 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressorSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17438
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17438
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75250/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17438
**[Test build #75250 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75250/testReport)**
for PR 17438 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17433#discussion_r108093020
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SessionState.scala ---
@@ -179,88 +132,295 @@ private[sql] class SessionState(
}
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
Thanks @squito , I will change some event logs files to test non zero the
off heap memory.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17430#discussion_r108092473
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ private[deploy] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17433#discussion_r108091767
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SessionState.scala ---
@@ -179,88 +132,295 @@ private[sql] class SessionState(
}
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17388
Thanks @vanzin for your comments. Yes, remote jars will also not be added
to client's classpath currently.
Any further comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17433#discussion_r108091528
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SessionState.scala ---
@@ -179,88 +132,295 @@ private[sql] class SessionState(
}
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17375
gentle ping @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17433#discussion_r108090394
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SessionState.scala ---
@@ -179,88 +132,295 @@ private[sql] class SessionState(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17440
**[Test build #75253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75253/testReport)**
for PR 17440 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17440
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17440
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75253/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17433#discussion_r108089769
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlanner.scala ---
@@ -42,6 +43,8 @@ class SparkPlanner(
InMemoryScans
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17440
**[Test build #75253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75253/testReport)**
for PR 17440 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17440
cc @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17440
[MINOR][SPARKR] Move 'Data type mapping between R and Spark' to right place
in SparkR doc.
Section ```Data type mapping between R and Spark``` was put in the wrong
place in SparkR doc
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
**[Test build #75251 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75251/testReport)**
for PR 17439 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75251/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
after this PR, what's the difference between `DESC EXTENDED` and `DESC
FORMATTED`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
**[Test build #75249 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75249/testReport)**
for PR 17439 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75249/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406
**[Test build #75252 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75252/testReport)**
for PR 17406 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295
LGTM, cc @mallman to check the `unmap` part
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406#discussion_r108087790
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType.scala ---
@@ -103,6 +104,12 @@ object DataType {
def fromJson(json:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295#discussion_r108087419
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerManagedBuffer.scala ---
@@ -17,31 +17,52 @@
package
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
ping @cloud-fan @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
**[Test build #75251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75251/testReport)**
for PR 17439 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428#discussion_r108086458
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ trait PredicateHelper {
*
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432#discussion_r108086367
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -597,12 +597,14 @@ object CollapseRepartition
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
cc @felixcheung, this adds the tests for the current status. Probably, let
me try to investigate and propose the changes about the type definition thing
later. I guess the branch is going to be
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17438
**[Test build #75250 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75250/testReport)**
for PR 17438 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
**[Test build #75249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75249/testReport)**
for PR 17439 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432
Thank you! uh, I have another case with different data types. That is why I
did not correctly reproduce it. The project is not removed due to data type
mismatches. : )
```Scala
val
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17439
[SPARK-20105][R] Add tests for checkType and type string in structField in R
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems `checkType` and the type string in
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17438
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user wzhfy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17438
[SPARK-20104][SQL] Don't estimate IsNull or IsNotNull predicates for
non-leaf node
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In current stage, we don't have advanced statistics
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406#discussion_r108085204
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType.scala ---
@@ -103,6 +104,12 @@ object DataType {
def fromJson(json:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406#discussion_r108083206
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType.scala ---
@@ -103,6 +104,12 @@ object DataType {
def fromJson(json:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
Please update the PR description too since you update the title.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394#discussion_r108082510
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import java.net.URI
import
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17435#discussion_r108082197
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -57,7 +57,25 @@ def __ne__(self, other):
@classmethod
def typeName(cls):
-
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
Thank you @felixcheung, IMO, I think it is fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r108080284
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r108080520
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/FPGrowthWrapper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r108080492
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/FPGrowthWrapper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170#discussion_r108079970
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_fpm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
thanks, merged to master, since part of the fix in scala was in master
only. if you think it should also be in branch-2.1, let me know.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17435#discussion_r108079001
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -57,7 +57,25 @@ def __ne__(self, other):
@classmethod
def typeName(cls):
-
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17437#discussion_r108078826
--- Diff: python/setup.py ---
@@ -167,7 +167,6 @@ def _supports_symlinks():
'pyspark.ml',
'pyspark.ml.linalg',
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17435#discussion_r108078597
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -57,7 +57,25 @@ def __ne__(self, other):
@classmethod
def typeName(cls):
-
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
also cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164
okay, it'd be better to close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
**[Test build #75248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75248/testReport)**
for PR 17429 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75248/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17437
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75246/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17437
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75247/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17437
**[Test build #75246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75246/testReport)**
for PR 17437 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
**[Test build #75247 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75247/testReport)**
for PR 17429 at commit
Github user indyragandy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
Get updated
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
@indyragandy What do you mean by "get directly"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user indyragandy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
Get directly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks a lot!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
**[Test build #75248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75248/testReport)**
for PR 17429 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12823
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12823
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75245/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12823
**[Test build #75245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75245/testReport)**
for PR 12823 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17429
**[Test build #75247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75247/testReport)**
for PR 17429 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432#discussion_r108074254
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -597,12 +597,14 @@ object CollapseRepartition
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432
The project will get eliminated by the optimizer. From the JIRA ticket:
```scala
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Window
val win_spec_max =
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432
@hvanhovell Could you share a Scala end-to-end test case for reproducing
the error? If using `withColumn`, we always insert a `Project` between two
`Window`s. Not sure why the users hit this
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432#discussion_r108072266
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -597,12 +597,14 @@ object CollapseRepartition
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17437#discussion_r108071973
--- Diff: python/setup.py ---
@@ -167,7 +167,6 @@ def _supports_symlinks():
'pyspark.ml',
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17437
**[Test build #75246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75246/testReport)**
for PR 17437 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17437
/cc @marmbrus @holdenk, this patch should fix the build issues blocking
Spark 2.1.1 RC1 builds.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17437
[SPARK-20102] Fix nightly snapshot and RC packaging scripts w/ two minor
build fixes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The master snapshot publisher builds are
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17423
got it. Thanks :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432
Thank you for fixing this! It seems that this should be included in RC2.
When will be cut for RC2?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17432
Thanks for the review. Merging this to master/2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12823
**[Test build #75245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75245/testReport)**
for PR 12823 at commit
Github user BenFradet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12823
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user BenFradet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12823
`org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerProactiveReplicationSuite.proactive
block replication - 3 replicas - 2 block manager deletions` doesn't seem to be
linked, relaunching the tests.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75244/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
**[Test build #75244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75244/testReport)**
for PR 17436 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75243/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
