Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17490
However, the name of the dynamic method cannot be exactly matched.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
**[Test build #75422 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75422/testReport)**
for PR 17483 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17492
**[Test build #75421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75421/testReport)**
for PR 17492 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17476#discussion_r109092194
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileIndex.scala
---
@@ -72,4 +72,14 @@ trait FileIndex {
/** Schema
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17476#discussion_r109092246
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/CatalogFileIndex.scala
---
@@ -111,7 +113,8 @@ private class
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17492
[SPARK-19641][SQL] JSON schema inference in DROPMALFORMED mode produces
incorrect schema for non-array/object JSONs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, when
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17492
cc @NathanHowell and @cloud-fan.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17491#discussion_r109091845
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/subquery.scala
---
@@ -498,3 +498,31 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
**[Test build #75420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75420/testReport)**
for PR 17483 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75420/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17491#discussion_r109091537
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/subquery.scala
---
@@ -498,3 +498,31 @@ object
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17486
LGTM
A variable marked with `@transient` will be restored to the default value
of the type, not the default value of the parameter.
Quoted from Chapter 25 of Programming in Scala,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17486
LGTM
It sounds like the support of the default value in Scala is weird. I did
some searches. Scala omits the default value. Another alternative is to define
auxiliary constructor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17486
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75415/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17486
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17486
**[Test build #75415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75415/testReport)**
for PR 17486 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Thanks @tgravescs , no problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17480
Would you please help to elaborate the problem you met? That would be
better to understand your scenario and fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
**[Test build #75420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75420/testReport)**
for PR 17483 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17489
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75413/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17489
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17489
**[Test build #75413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75413/testReport)**
for PR 17489 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75418/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
**[Test build #75418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75418/testReport)**
for PR 17483 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17490
This is not a comment. This is the name used to automatically create a
visit function by the parser.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17491
**[Test build #75419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75419/testReport)**
for PR 17491 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17469#discussion_r109050696
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -250,11 +250,39 @@ def __iter__(self):
raise TypeError("Column is not iterable")
#
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17469#discussion_r109050842
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -250,11 +250,39 @@ def __iter__(self):
raise TypeError("Column is not iterable")
#
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17469#discussion_r109049873
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -250,11 +250,39 @@ def __iter__(self):
raise TypeError("Column is not iterable")
#
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17469#discussion_r109085179
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -250,11 +250,39 @@ def __iter__(self):
raise TypeError("Column is not iterable")
#
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17491
cc @wzhfy @hvanhovell @nsyca
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17491
[SQL][WIP] Exists should not be evaluated in Join operator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Similar to `ListQuery`, `Exists` should not be evaluated in `Join` operator
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3628 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3628/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3629 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3629/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
The only failure was in completely unrelated HiveMetadataCatalogSuite
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3627 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3627/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17481
Please help to code view,thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
**[Test build #75414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75414/testReport)**
for PR 17014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75414/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17490
[SPARK-20167]In SqlBase.g4,some of the comments is not correct.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In SqlBase.g4,some of the comments is not correct.
eg.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17490
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3625 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3625/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
**[Test build #75418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75418/testReport)**
for PR 17483 at commit
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
@tdas @brkyvz
- Added new changes for removing other constants hardcoded at multiple
places.
- Squashed 3 commits into single commit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75417/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
**[Test build #75417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75417/testReport)**
for PR 17483 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17489#discussion_r109083697
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ def csv(self, path, schema=None, sep=None,
encoding=None, quote=None, escape=Non
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
**[Test build #75417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75417/testReport)**
for PR 17483 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
btw, @gatorsmile it looks like `listColumns` should throw
`NoSuchTableException` and/or `NoSuchDatabaseException` instead of
`AnalysisException
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75412/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3626/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3624 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3624/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #75412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75412/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11515
@rmchurch I think this bug has been resolved in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16515
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3622 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3622/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3623/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
update PR description!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483#discussion_r109082276
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/catalog.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17477
**[Test build #75416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75416/testReport)**
for PR 17477 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17486
**[Test build #75415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75415/testReport)**
for PR 17486 at commit
Github user kunalkhamar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17486#discussion_r109081024
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/AnalysisException.scala ---
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ class AnalysisException protected[sql] (
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
@hhbyyh Thanks for you comments! And sorry for this late reply.
I update this PR: 1,limit the scope, only modifiy algorithms in which
double-caching already exist
2, add a function
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
**[Test build #75414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75414/testReport)**
for PR 17014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75411/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75411/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17486#discussion_r109079424
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/AnalysisException.scala ---
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ class AnalysisException protected[sql] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75410/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #75410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75410/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17489
**[Test build #75413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75413/testReport)**
for PR 17489 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17489
cc @srowen and @ueshin, could you take a look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17489
[SPARK-20166][SQL] Use XXX for ISO timezone instead of ZZ (FastDateFormat
specific) in CSV/JSON timeformat options
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3626 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3626/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3625/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75408/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17384#discussion_r109074309
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala ---
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ private[regression] trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #75408 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75408/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17384#discussion_r109074112
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/IsotonicRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -189,6 +191,47 @@ class IsotonicRegressionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3624 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3624/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #75412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75412/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3623 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3623/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #3622 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3622/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user zuotingbing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17452#discussion_r109072645
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -217,43 +217,43 @@ fi
# Make R package - this is used for both CRAN release and packing R layout
into
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75409/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #75409 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75409/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
Github user discipleforteen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16637
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488#discussion_r109070462
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamTest.scala ---
@@ -490,6 +490,18 @@ trait StreamTest extends QueryTest with
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488#discussion_r109069839
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FlatMapGroupsWithStateExec.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +68,17 @@ case class
Github user ron8hu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
cc @sameeragarwal @cloud-fan @gatorsmile @wzhfy After a few round of
changes and commits, this PR should be in good shape. If we can include in
Spark 2.2, then it can help tpc-h queries.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17488
**[Test build #75410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75410/testReport)**
for PR 17488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75411 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75411/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17481
if you expand the table to equal the total rows the paging options will
disappear. This is too unreasonable. For me a large number of data pages show,
it is not convenient and reasonable.
1 - 100 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
