Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17581
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75819/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17581
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17581
**[Test build #75819 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75819/testReport)**
for PR 17581 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17630
> are we storing UTF8Strings directly in the catalog for statistics? That
doesn't make sense ... if we are not, then we are not using internal types.
@rxin By "in the catalog for statistics",
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75818/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75818 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75818/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75817/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642
**[Test build #75817 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75817/testReport)**
for PR 17642 at commit
Github user facaiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556
@sethah Perhaps it's hard to compare R with Spark's behavior, since many
factors involved. I'd like to read R GBM's code, and verify consistency of both
side's design on split criteria. Is it OK?
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r111656245
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForestSuite.scala ---
@@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ class RandomForestSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r111656240
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForestSuite.scala ---
@@ -126,9 +138,10 @@ class RandomForestSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r111656235
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForestSuite.scala ---
@@ -112,9 +124,9 @@ class RandomForestSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user wangyum closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17637
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17581
**[Test build #75819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75819/testReport)**
for PR 17581 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642#discussion_r111654148
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -448,7 +448,9 @@ object DockerIntegrationTests {
*/
object DependencyOverrides {
lazy val
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642
cc @srowen and @vanzin. I think apparently it is a similar issue with
[SPARK-11538](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11538). Could you
check if it makes sense?
I think this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642#discussion_r111653875
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -448,7 +448,9 @@ object DockerIntegrationTests {
*/
object DependencyOverrides {
lazy val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75818 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75818/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642
**[Test build #75817 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75817/testReport)**
for PR 17642 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642
[SPARK-20343][BUILD] Force Avro 1.7.7 in sbt build to resolve build failure
in SBT Hadoop 2.6 master on Jenkins
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596#discussion_r111653739
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -537,3 +539,27 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17149
@cnauroth Thank you so much for your help.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cnauroth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17149
@HyukjinKwon , nice to meet you! I see I got notified here for a bit of
Hadoop `Path` knowledge, and particularly on Windows.
> Is it okay to use both URIs and local file paths for the
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17416
@srowen , I finally had some time to look into this and I was able to get
the correct jar on the classpath. The fix was to use the code you had in the
previous commit for
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17506
Thanks @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75816/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641
**[Test build #75816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75816/testReport)**
for PR 17641 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
cc @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
I will some bound check and error handling.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75815/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
**[Test build #75815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75815/testReport)**
for PR 17640 at commit
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
Been following this but haven't had time to do a proper review, but
@tgravescs since you brought up the UI vs API thing, as of 2.0 the UI gets it's
list from the API so that's where the security
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641
**[Test build #75816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75816/testReport)**
for PR 17641 at commit
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641
[SPARK-20329][SQL] Make timezone aware expression without timezone
unresolved.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
TBD
## How was this patch tested?
TBD
You
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
@cloud-fan, could you have another look at this?
There are a few new changes:
* withNewExecutionId now warns instead of throwing an exception, but still
throws exceptions if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75814/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
**[Test build #75814 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75814/testReport)**
for PR 17568 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
@marmbrus could you please take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user frreiss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
Overall, this looks like a sensible approach to a messy problem.
You might want to think about adding some overflow handling to the SQL-->R
translation. That is, if a Dataframe contains a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75813/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
**[Test build #75813 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75813/testReport)**
for PR 17540 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111614833
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetPrimitiveSuite.scala ---
@@ -253,4 +256,27 @@ class DatasetPrimitiveSuite extends QueryTest
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111614744
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +99,32 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111614710
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ case class NullPropagation(conf:
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17530
> Right now the PR doesn't set that, so it needs to be set under the user's
HADOOP_CONF even though it had no real effect. That probably should be changed.
Yep, same problem I'm seeing.
Github user MechCoder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17621
Thanks @MLnick !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
**[Test build #75815 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75815/testReport)**
for PR 17640 at commit
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
[SPARK-17608][SPARKR]:Long type has incorrect serialization/deserialization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`bigint` is not supported in schema and the serialization is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
**[Test build #75814 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75814/testReport)**
for PR 17568 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17630
Wait - are we storing UTF8Strings directly in the catalog for statistics?
That doesn't make sense ... if we are not, then we are not using internal
types. In that case we should document clearly
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17633
Then it should work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75811/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75811 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75811/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17637
This does not work. Any classes that have already been loaded from the old
jar will not be unloaded. So you're going to end up with really odd issues when
two classes from different jars don't agree
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75810/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75810 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75810/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
**[Test build #75813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75813/testReport)**
for PR 17540 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75812/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #75812 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75812/testReport)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #75812 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75812/testReport)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17633
> Does this work for non-Hive tables?
This is geared towards Hive partitioned tables. If we have another system
that prunes table partitions based on a string-ified pruning predicate I'm
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user koertkuipers commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17639
@cloud-fan thanks for doing this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17639
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17639
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75809/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17639
**[Test build #75809 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75809/testReport)**
for PR 17639 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75811 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75811/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75810 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75810/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
Sorry again the wording above and all the different configs are a bit
confusing to me as to what the real issues are here.
>Here actually has two list of acls, one is controlled by
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17592
I cherry picked this into branch-2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75808/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75808 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75808/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17639
cc @koertkuipers
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17639
**[Test build #75809 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75809/testReport)**
for PR 17639 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17639
[SPARK-19716][SQL][follow-up] UnresolvedMapObjects should always be
serializable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17398 we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17637
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17637
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75806/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17637
**[Test build #75806 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75806/testReport)**
for PR 17637 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75807/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
**[Test build #75807 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75807/testReport)**
for PR 17568 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17533
I think the failed unit test can be fixed in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17634 and
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17603
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17636
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17636
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75805/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17636
**[Test build #75805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75805/testReport)**
for PR 17636 at commit
Github user jbloom22 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17374
Our users (https://hail.is) are running into this bug. Will the backport be
merged soon? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17364
thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #75808 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75808/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17477
The build should use 1.7.7, yes. Hadoop pulls in 1.7.4, but, it does so in
2.6 and 2.7. And the SBT and Maven builds seem to get that right as intended
because the POM directly overrides this
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
