Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
Based on my understanding, it does not directly solvethe 12360. This one
just solves the serialization of a specific type `bigint` in struct field.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
For `Inf` case, I used a very large number:
Github user lvdongr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17620
Execute me, Can this issue be closed or threre are some other problem?
@jerryshao
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
yea let's remove that test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15398
Re-checked the current change, I think it is in a good shape. Do we have
unsolved issues or decisions on this?
ping @jodersky Would you like to update this with master? Thanks.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
**[Test build #75850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75850/testReport)**
for PR 17568 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111704431
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ case class NullPropagation(conf:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75847/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111704129
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +98,30 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75849/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111704118
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ case class NullPropagation(conf:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #75847 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75847/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
**[Test build #75849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75849/testReport)**
for PR 17655 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15398#discussion_r111704017
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/regexpExpressions.scala
---
@@ -68,7 +68,30 @@ trait StringRegexExpression
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75846/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540#discussion_r111703865
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLExecution.scala ---
@@ -39,6 +39,32 @@ object SQLExecution {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #75846 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75846/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540#discussion_r111703744
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
// to happen right
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75848/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
**[Test build #75848 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75848/testReport)**
for PR 17655 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641#discussion_r111703152
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveInlineTables.scala
---
@@ -99,12 +99,9 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641#discussion_r111702719
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveInlineTables.scala
---
@@ -99,12 +99,9 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
> What are the external impacts of these changes? Which commands are
impacted?
This patch mainly cleans up the definition of two string representation
methods: `simpleString`,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641#discussion_r111701221
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveInlineTables.scala
---
@@ -99,12 +99,9 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17149
@gatorsmile, Thanks for your pointer. There is a good discussion there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17149
Our parser might need a change regarding escape handling. We are having a
related discussion in another PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15398
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
I'll review it after branch 2.2 is cut
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111699305
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +98,30 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111699178
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ case class NullPropagation(conf:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17375
gentle ping ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17622
LGTM except for a doc comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17622#discussion_r111698372
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/recommendation.py ---
@@ -384,6 +392,28 @@ def itemFactors(self):
"""
return
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111697961
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +98,30 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111697946
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +98,30 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
**[Test build #75849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75849/testReport)**
for PR 17655 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
**[Test build #75848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75848/testReport)**
for PR 17655 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111697079
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +98,30 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
cc @srowen @HyukjinKwon @cloud-fan @nihavend
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
[SPARK-20156] [SQL] [FOLLOW-UP] Java String toLowerCase "Turkish locale
bug" in Database and Table DDLs
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Database and Table names conform
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #75847 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75847/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r111696732
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/objects.scala
---
@@ -96,3 +98,30 @@ object CombineTypedFilters extends
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649#discussion_r111696709
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/describe_tbleproperty_validation.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+CREATE TABLE table_with_comment
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
@sethah Thanks! I have merged your updates and fix mima file conflicts.
@yanboliang has just come back from trip and will help review and merge it
into 2.2 so don't worry about it!
---
If
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649#discussion_r111696418
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -232,7 +232,9 @@ case class AlterTableSetPropertiesCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #75846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75846/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17654
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17654
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75845/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17654
**[Test build #75845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75845/testReport)**
for PR 17654 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75843/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
**[Test build #75843 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75843/testReport)**
for PR 17651 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17654
**[Test build #75845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75845/testReport)**
for PR 17654 at commit
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17654
[SPARK-20351] [ML] Add trait hasTrainingSummary to replace the duplicate
code
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a trait HasTrainingSummary to avoid code duplicate
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
Yes. The codes have the bug. For example, when the locale is TR, users are
unable to create a table with a table name containing `I`. This does not make
sense to me. I believe we have more
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
Btw, I've been working on this and just posted some thoughts about one
design choice here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9478
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17653
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17653
**[Test build #75844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75844/testReport)**
for PR 17653 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17653
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75844/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17652
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75842/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17652
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17652
**[Test build #75842 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75842/testReport)**
for PR 17652 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
@WeichenXu123 I made a PR to your branch. Can you check it? I think you'll
still need to update the Mima file. Also, this may not make 2.2, so then you'd
have to update the since tags.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17653
**[Test build #75844 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75844/testReport)**
for PR 17653 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17653
cc @felixcheung, this simply renames it to `as.json.array`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17653
[SPARK-19828][R][FOLLOWUP] Rename asJsonArray to as.json.array in from_json
function in R
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This was suggested to be `as.json.array`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
**[Test build #75843 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75843/testReport)**
for PR 17651 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
cc @srowen, could you check if it makes sense to you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650#discussion_r111692337
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,11 @@ object BooleanSimplification
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650#discussion_r111692327
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/BooleanSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -160,4 +166,12 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17590
Sure, thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
Ah, sorry, it was only about fixing tests. I thought we have bugs in the
main codes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650#discussion_r111692175
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,11 @@ object BooleanSimplification
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
I left a uesless comment and removed it back (I misunderstood). Yes, I will
add a small comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17652
**[Test build #75842 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75842/testReport)**
for PR 17652 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
Yea, pom was the first try and it was kind if a failed. Please check out
the discussion in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17642
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17652
[SPARK-20335] [SQL] [BACKPORT-2.1] Children expressions of Hive UDF impacts
the determinism of Hive UDF
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to backport
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
perhaps have a reference in pom.xml to this so they both change together
the next time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17633#discussion_r111691537
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -589,18 +590,34 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17524
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75841/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17524
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17524
**[Test build #75841 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75841/testReport)**
for PR 17524 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
Yes you have a point. It is minor in that it is just a test that is now
locale sensitive and supporting the locale in tests is much less important.
However ideally whatever fails should be fixed as
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
Sorry, my previous comment is to @HyukjinKwon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell @sameeragarwal for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user nihavend commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
maybe
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75839/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17650
**[Test build #75839 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75839/testReport)**
for PR 17650 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r111690507
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,37 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557#discussion_r111690515
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -906,6 +910,37 @@ predicted <- predict(model, df)
head(predicted)
```
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75838/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17644
**[Test build #75838 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75838/testReport)**
for PR 17644 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
: ) It sounds like you did not get my points. Anyway, I will fix it later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17651
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
