Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17742
**[Test build #76258 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76258/testReport)**
for PR 17742 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
+1 for this change. I'll try to take a look sometime, but maybe after the
QA period. Also cc @MLnick.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556
I don't mind the weighted midpoints. However, if for a continuous feature
we find that many points have the exact same value, we are assuming we may find
data points in the test set that are close
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
Personally, I'm fine with this patch, the only concern is we should have a
follow up for nested query execution ASAP. And we should revert
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r113855186
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -1009,10 +1009,24 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r113855243
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForestSuite.scala ---
@@ -138,9 +169,10 @@ class RandomForestSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r113854473
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForestSuite.scala ---
@@ -112,9 +138,11 @@ class RandomForestSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r113855209
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -1037,7 +1051,10 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785#discussion_r113855222
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api/r/SQLUtils.scala
---
@@ -92,48 +93,8 @@ private[sql] object SQLUtils extends Logging {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17797
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17797
merged to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785#discussion_r113854501
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api/r/SQLUtils.scala
---
@@ -92,48 +93,8 @@ private[sql] object SQLUtils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17797
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76257/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17797
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17797
**[Test build #76257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76257/testReport)**
for PR 17797 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17503
I think the benefit of this would be for speed at predict time or for model
storage. @srowen the nodes don't have to be equal to be merged, they just have
to output the same prediction. Since this a
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640#discussion_r113853971
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/serialize.R ---
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ writeObject <- function(con, object, writeType = TRUE) {
Date = writeDate(con,
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17797
@felixcheung As I checked the SparkR programming guide, it seems that all
machine learning parts are links to existing documents. So I just add the link
to Linear SVM document and tested it.
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640#discussion_r113853483
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/serialize.R ---
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ writeObject <- function(con, object, writeType = TRUE) {
Date = writeDate(con,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17797
**[Test build #76257 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76257/testReport)**
for PR 17797 at commit
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17797
[SparkR][DOC]:Document LinearSVC in R programming guide
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add link to svmLinear in the SparkR programming document.
## How
Github user phatak-dev commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16609
@gatorsmile sure. I will give a PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17303
I did quick benchmarks by using a TPCDS query (Q4) (I just referred the
previous work in #10342)
Based on the result, it seems it's a bit earlier to implement this;
```
scaleFactor: 4
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785#discussion_r113851957
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api/r/SQLUtils.scala
---
@@ -92,48 +93,8 @@ private[sql] object SQLUtils extends Logging {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785#discussion_r113851718
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api/r/SQLUtils.scala
---
@@ -92,48 +93,8 @@ private[sql] object SQLUtils extends Logging {
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640#discussion_r113851363
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/serialize.R ---
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ writeObject <- function(con, object, writeType = TRUE) {
Date = writeDate(con,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17781
cc @cloud-fan @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17774
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76256/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17774
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17774
**[Test build #76256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76256/testReport)**
for PR 17774 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783#discussion_r113849536
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1478,6 +1481,13 @@ test_that("column functions", {
lapply(
list(list(x =
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783#discussion_r113849200
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -67,8 +67,7 @@ operators <- list(
"+" = "plus", "-" = "minus", "*" = "multiply", "/" = "divide", "%%" =
"mod",
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783#discussion_r113849582
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1965,6 +1975,16 @@ test_that("filter() on a DataFrame", {
# Test stats::filter
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783#discussion_r113849285
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -302,3 +301,65 @@ setMethod("otherwise",
jc <- callJMethod(x@jc, "otherwise", value)
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17786
@mgummelt We tested this in our production env, and it solves our issue.
Since it seems to be a trivial change, I made my judgement. Gonna wait for more
feedback. Thanks.
---
If your project is
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783#discussion_r113849107
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -302,3 +301,65 @@ setMethod("otherwise",
jc <- callJMethod(x@jc, "otherwise", value)
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17786
@mgummelt We tested this in our production env, and it solves our issue.
Since it seems to be a trivial change, I made my judgement. Gonna wait for more
feedback.
---
If your project is set up
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785#discussion_r113847972
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api/r/SQLUtils.scala
---
@@ -92,48 +93,8 @@ private[sql] object SQLUtils extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17774
**[Test build #76256 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76256/testReport)**
for PR 17774 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17774
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17774
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785
**[Test build #76255 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76255/testReport)**
for PR 17785 at commit
Github user dgshep commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17786
Fair point. This felt like a succinct way to handle this corner case, but
if it makes sense to harden the offer refusal code instead, I can update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785#discussion_r113847076
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api/r/SQLUtils.scala
---
@@ -92,48 +93,8 @@ private[sql] object SQLUtils extends Logging {
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17785#discussion_r113846935
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/utils.R ---
@@ -864,6 +864,14 @@ captureJVMException <- function(e, method) {
# Extract the first message of JVM exception.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17742
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76254/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17742
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17742
**[Test build #76254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76254/testReport)**
for PR 17742 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r113846602
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -82,8 +81,8 @@ private[fpm] trait FPGrowthParams extends Params with
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r113846530
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -268,12 +269,8 @@ class FPGrowthModel private[ml] (
val predictUDF
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r113846563
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17796
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user 10110346 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17796
[SPARK-20519][SQL][CORE]Modify to prevent some possible runtime exceptions
Signed-off-by: liuxian
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76251/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76251 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76251/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
Github user johnc1231 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459
@viirya Any more feedback on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17742
**[Test build #76254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76254/testReport)**
for PR 17742 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17781
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17781
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76252/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17781
**[Test build #76252 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76252/testReport)**
for PR 17781 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
LGTM - merging to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
[SPARK-20517][UI] Fix broken history UI download link
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The download link in history server UI is concatenated with:
```
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
**[Test build #76253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76253/testReport)**
for PR 17795 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17702
@HyukjinKwon Can you help me to find a appropriate reviewer about this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17794
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76250/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user heary-cao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17794
Supplement the new blockidsuite unit tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the new unit tests to support ShuffleDataBlockId ,
ShuffleIndexBlockId ,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76250 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76250/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
@cloud-fan Do you mean `SELECT \\abc`?
Spark 2.x:
sql("select '\\abc'").show()
+---+
|abc|
+---+
|abc|
+---+
GitHub user danielyli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
[SPARK-20484][MLLIB] Add documentation to ALS code
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds documentation to the ALS code.
## How was this patch tested?
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17789
To add, for non streaming usecases, this will definitely help - but was
this a recent change for streaming ? (probably after @aramesh117 make the PR ?)
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
When shall we free a column vector? One is when the iterator is consumed
up, another one is when we have a `LIMIT n` in the query and stop reading the
iterator at some point. Is there any other
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17789
I thought the main reason @aramesh117 did this PR was for compression to be
enabled for spark streaming usecase.
If compression is already enabled, then am I missing something here ?
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76249/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76249 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76249/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17771
@gatorsmile
ok,
please review it again.
thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user anabranch closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17792
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17645#discussion_r113836900
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -42,15 +44,35 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, lit}
GitHub user anabranch opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17792
[SPARK-20496][SS] Bug in KafkaWriter Looks at Unanalyzed Plans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We didn't enforce analyzed plans in Spark 2.1 when writing out to
Github user anabranch closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17787
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jtengyp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17742
I did some tests with the PR.
Here is the cluster configure:
3 workers, each has 10 cores and 30G memory.
With the netflix dataset (480,189 users and 17770 movies), the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17781
**[Test build #76252 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76252/testReport)**
for PR 17781 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
@brkyvz please take a another look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
@zsxwing and @cloud-fan, can you have another look at this? I'd really like
to get it in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76246/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76245/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76245/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765
**[Test build #76246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76246/testReport)**
for PR 17765 at commit
Github user kunalkhamar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765#discussion_r113831182
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -825,6 +832,11 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17790
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17790
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76244/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kunalkhamar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765#discussion_r113830998
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -825,6 +832,11 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17790
**[Test build #76244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76244/testReport)**
for PR 17790 at commit
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo