Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76295/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
**[Test build #76295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76295/testReport)**
for PR 17783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
**[Test build #76295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76295/testReport)**
for PR 17783 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
Jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17807
**[Test build #76294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76294/testReport)**
for PR 17807 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17807
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76294/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17807
**[Test build #76294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76294/testReport)**
for PR 17807 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17807
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17807
[SPARK-20532][SPARKR] Implement grouping and grouping_id
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds R wrappers for:
- `o.a.s.sql.functions.grouping` as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #76293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76293/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user danielyli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793#discussion_r114044512
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -910,26 +944,127 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
@mridulm if you're talking about
`ServiceCredentialProvider.obtainCredentials`, which is a public interface that
exposes UGI (`Credentials` in this case), then sure, it's probably worth to
tweak it
Github user facaiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556
By the way, it's safe to use mean value as it is match the other libraries.
If requested, I'd like to modify the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
**[Test build #76292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76292/testReport)**
for PR 17793 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76292/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
@cloud-fan although @hvanhovell haven't comment yet, I will go to fix the
inconsistency first and see if we have defined tests against it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user facaiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556
For a (train) sample of continuous series, say {x0, x1, x2, x3, ..., x100}.
Now spark select quantile as split point.
Suppose 10-quantiles is used, and x2 is 1st quantile, and x10 is 2nd
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
@hvanhovell @rxin I've updated this accordingly. Do you have more comments
on this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76288/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #76288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76288/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r114043568
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForestSuite.scala ---
@@ -138,9 +169,10 @@ class RandomForestSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r114043558
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -1037,7 +1051,10 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r114043563
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -1009,10 +1009,24 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435#discussion_r114043519
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1231,6 +1295,109 @@ class
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r114043439
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForestSuite.scala ---
@@ -112,9 +138,11 @@ class RandomForestSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76291/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
**[Test build #76291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76291/testReport)**
for PR 17783 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
I assume only event log download will be effected with #17582 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
@ajbozarth , I checked the UI related to attemptId, seems fine without
issue. Can you please point out in which code potentially has the regression?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
**[Test build #76292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76292/testReport)**
for PR 17793 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76290/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
**[Test build #76290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76290/testReport)**
for PR 17783 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
**[Test build #76291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76291/testReport)**
for PR 17783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17783
**[Test build #76290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76290/testReport)**
for PR 17783 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17395
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76286/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17395
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17395
**[Test build #76286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76286/testReport)**
for PR 17395 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114040288
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -357,6 +357,34 @@
org.apache.commons
commons-crypto
+
+
+
+
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
@vanzin While UGI does provide credential store and implementations for
GSSAPI, it also does a bunch of other things - which are leveraged by hadoop
ipc, hadoop common, etc.
Leveraging ugi
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
@ajbozarth OK, I will verify it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76289/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
**[Test build #76289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76289/testReport)**
for PR 17793 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
Oh ok, I see why this is needed now that I see how #17582 changes how the
api works, though I'm a bit worried this might not be the only thing that
might've broken. You may want to look around
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
@vanzin , can you please review this PR, thanks! The download link is
broken after this change #17582 . Now it will check SparkUI with given appid
and attemptId. Previous way of setting attemptId
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
> For example, use of UGI for spark security in core.
UGI, as far as I understand, is being used mostly as a credential store and
wrapper around the JAAS / GSSAPI code. Replicating that code
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114039586
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -357,6 +357,34 @@
org.apache.commons
commons-crypto
+
+
+
+
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
This is due to my changes in #17582 , with this change, download API will
verify with correct ACL, so if attemptId is not found, then `withSparkUI` will
be failed to get correct SparkUI to do
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76287/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #76287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76287/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114038568
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114038350
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114038878
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/DefaultHadoopAccessManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114038193
--- Diff: core/pom.xml ---
@@ -357,6 +357,34 @@
org.apache.commons
commons-crypto
+
+
+
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793
**[Test build #76289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76289/testReport)**
for PR 17793 at commit
Github user danielyli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793#discussion_r114039105
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -1026,7 +1161,24 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17795
@ajbozarth the key point is that several spark applications doesn't have
attempt id. It's not related to one attempt or two, for example:
```
{
"id" :
Github user danielyli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793#discussion_r114038722
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -910,26 +944,127 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user danielyli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793#discussion_r114038705
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -910,26 +944,127 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user danielyli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793#discussion_r114038426
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -910,26 +944,127 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user danielyli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17793#discussion_r114038185
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -791,32 +813,43 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114035264
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114036949
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ConfigurableCredentialManagerSuite.scala
---
@@ -130,9 +129,9 @@ class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114037569
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNConfigurableCredentialManagerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114037710
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNConfigurableCredentialManagerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114037045
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -685,23 +685,23 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114035613
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114037318
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/*
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114035656
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/DefaultHadoopAccessManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114036751
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ServiceCredentialProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114037214
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/*
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114036690
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ServiceCredentialProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114037394
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNHadoopAccessManager.scala
---
@@ -21,66 +21,47 @@ import
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114035526
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114037549
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNConfigurableCredentialManagerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r114036708
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ServiceCredentialProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
thank you Holden and Joseph, I'm on it now :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17806
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76284/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17806
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17806
**[Test build #76284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76284/testReport)**
for PR 17806 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
LGTM, thanks for adding this! @felixcheung OK with merging?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
Either that, or we could add a private helper method to the Scala API which
Python calls to get a nicer type. (E.g., the Scala helper could return a tuple
of 2 arrays, rather than an array of
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17806
@gatorsmile i will let you merge ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17456
Please close this issue
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17180
ping @JoshRosen @davies @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17180#discussion_r114036088
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -358,10 +358,20 @@ public long spill(long numBytes) throws
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #76288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76288/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17806
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76283/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17806
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17806
**[Test build #76283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76283/testReport)**
for PR 17806 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #76287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76287/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
@felixcheung, reverted the code change of `transform` as requested. Please
check the update. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
