Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76408/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #76408 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76408/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
cc @michal-databricks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
LGTM - merging to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76407/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #76407 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76407/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17819
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17819
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76406/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17819
**[Test build #76406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76406/testReport)**
for PR 17819 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17832#discussion_r114472869
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76405/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
**[Test build #76405 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76405/testReport)**
for PR 17838 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
> This also seems unreasonable to me because so many backslashes are
confusing and it seems to me that no other systems have similar behavior
Like I said before, it's because java string
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76401/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
**[Test build #76401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76401/testReport)**
for PR 17100 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346#discussion_r114468906
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InMemoryFileIndex.scala
---
@@ -36,20 +37,27 @@ import
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346#discussion_r114468833
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -145,6 +147,41 @@ class FileStreamSinkSuite extends
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346#discussion_r114468801
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSink.scala
---
@@ -53,6 +53,29 @@ object FileStreamSink extends
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346#discussion_r114468821
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSink.scala
---
@@ -53,6 +53,29 @@ object FileStreamSink extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17346
**[Test build #76408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76408/testReport)**
for PR 17346 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76403/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #76403 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76403/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76404/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
**[Test build #76404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76404/testReport)**
for PR 17836 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
For the regex, currently users need to write something like
`df.filter("value rlike '^x20[x20-x23]+$'")`. This seems
unreasonable to me and it is this patch tries to fix.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17819
**[Test build #76406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76406/testReport)**
for PR 17819 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #76407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76407/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
yea, much clearer now, and the string literal in Spark 2.0 looks more
reasonable.
For the regex, I think it's unfair to compare `df.filter("value rlike
'^\\x20[\\x20-\\x23]+$'")` with
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
Thank you for review, @kiszk
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
LGTM
cc: @sameeragarwal @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
@rxin, would you help me review it again?thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
**[Test build #76405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76405/testReport)**
for PR 17838 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17736
@cloud-fan I've updated the example. Please check if it is better for you.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76399/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
**[Test build #76399 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76399/testReport)**
for PR 17838 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76398/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
**[Test build #76398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76398/testReport)**
for PR 17735 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17794
@jerryshao
I have been updated it.
please review it again.
thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17833
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17833
merging to master/2.2/2.1/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17833
> I think it only cleans localProperties in the current thread.
localProperties overrides childValue and always clones a new Properties for
child threads.
Yea, that's true. If some child
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76402/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
**[Test build #76402 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76402/testReport)**
for PR 17100 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556#discussion_r114457816
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -1037,7 +1042,8 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends Logging
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835#discussion_r114460827
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -230,7 +230,9 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
@vanzin:
> @mridulm the main argument for just dealing with Hadoop security is that
it's been sufficient since the inception of Spark. I have never seen anyone ask
for integration with any
Github user watermen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
When we create a DataSource table like below
```sql
create table t1 using parquet select * from src limit 1000;
```
It will call `CollectLimitExec.doExecute`, it also use
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #76403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76403/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
**[Test build #76404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76404/testReport)**
for PR 17836 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76396/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17825
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76400/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
**[Test build #76396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76396/testReport)**
for PR 17540 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17825
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17825
**[Test build #76400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76400/testReport)**
for PR 17825 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17821
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76392/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17821
**[Test build #76392 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76392/testReport)**
for PR 17821 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17821
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17825#discussion_r114457011
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -132,17 +132,24 @@ createMethods()
#' alias
#'
-#' Set a new name for a column
+#' Set a new name
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
**[Test build #76402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76402/testReport)**
for PR 17100 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17825
**[Test build #76400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76400/testReport)**
for PR 17825 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
**[Test build #76401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76401/testReport)**
for PR 17100 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17818
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76397/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17818
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
**[Test build #76399 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76399/testReport)**
for PR 17838 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17818
**[Test build #76397 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76397/testReport)**
for PR 17818 at commit
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17838
[SPARK-20567] Lazily bind in GenerateExec
It is not valid to eagerly bind with the child's output as this causes
failures when we attempt to canonicalize the plan (replacing the attribute
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735#discussion_r114453379
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamSuite.scala ---
@@ -120,6 +141,32 @@ class StreamSuite extends StreamTest {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17735
**[Test build #76398 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76398/testReport)**
for PR 17735 at commit
Github user LuciferWong commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9699
This is what I wrote it myself ï¼ https://github.com/LuciferWong/spark
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76393/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17835
**[Test build #76393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76393/testReport)**
for PR 17835 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17818
**[Test build #76397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76397/testReport)**
for PR 17818 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17818#discussion_r114450054
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3890,3 +3890,23 @@ setMethod("not",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions", "not",
x@jc)
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17818#discussion_r114450006
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3974,3 +3974,23 @@ setMethod("grouping_id",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17831
@gatorsmile This sounds reasonable but I am not sure if I fully understand
your concerns.
If anything this brings PySpark closer to the Scala API. At this moment we
have
```
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
**[Test build #76396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76396/testReport)**
for PR 17540 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76394/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17836
**[Test build #76394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76394/testReport)**
for PR 17836 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17821#discussion_r114446352
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/Worker.scala
---
@@ -266,7 +289,8 @@ private[deploy] class Worker(
if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76395/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
**[Test build #76395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76395/testReport)**
for PR 17540 at commit
Github user rberenguel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
@gatorsmile Thanks for the pointers, finally found some time to come back
to this. I'm not sure if my approach to get the `SQLConf` into `checkAnalysis`
is the correct one in my current local
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17831
I feel like that's an unrelated challenge. I'm happy to see other
improvements but I'm worried that we will hold up changes for things which
aren't happening soon - is there a JIRA for these
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
