Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116659903
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
**[Test build #76955 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76955/testReport)**
for PR 17990 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
**[Test build #76954 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76954/testReport)**
for PR 17990 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116657546
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116656846
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935#discussion_r116656440
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ identifierComment
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116656190
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116655649
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116655664
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116655632
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116646341
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2306,7 +2306,15 @@ object functions {
* @group string_funcs
*
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116656332
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116646257
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2382,7 +2390,15 @@ object functions {
* @group string_funcs
*
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116646329
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2382,7 +2390,15 @@ object functions {
* @group string_funcs
*
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116656230
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116645110
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1086,10 +1106,22 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116656069
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116655023
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2447,7 +2463,15 @@ object functions {
* @group string_funcs
*
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116644643
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1106,10 +1126,22 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116655691
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116646246
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2306,7 +2306,15 @@ object functions {
* @group string_funcs
*
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116644377
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1091,6 +1094,23 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116655997
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17994
cc @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17994
[SPARK-20505][ML] Add docs and examples for ml.stat.Correlation and
ml.stat.ChiSquareTest.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add docs and examples for
Github user arman1371 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16598#discussion_r116655733
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2603,6 +2603,21 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
def
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17946
LGTM
Thanks for doing this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935#discussion_r116655663
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala
---
@@ -868,6 +868,29 @@ class SubquerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978#discussion_r116655296
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2111,26 +2112,45 @@ class StringIndexer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasHandleInvalid,
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978
@felixcheung Thanks so much for the review. I addressed most of the
comments except auto generating code for defining `stringOrderType`. This
parameter is not a shared trait on the Scala side,
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978#discussion_r116655031
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2111,26 +2112,45 @@ class StringIndexer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasHandleInvalid,
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17983
@srowen Can you please take a look !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978#discussion_r116654554
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2082,8 +2082,9 @@ class StringIndexer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasHandleInvalid,
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978#discussion_r116654542
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2139,6 +2159,20 @@ def setParams(self, inputCol=None, outputCol=None,
handleInvalid="error"):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17934
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17934
LGTM
I'll merge this with master and branch-2.2
Thanks all!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978#discussion_r116652156
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2082,8 +2082,9 @@ class StringIndexer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasHandleInvalid,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978#discussion_r116652194
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2139,6 +2159,20 @@ def setParams(self, inputCol=None, outputCol=None,
handleInvalid="error"):
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978#discussion_r116652102
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2111,26 +2112,45 @@ class StringIndexer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasHandleInvalid,
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672
@zero323 I think that its license needs to be compatible with Apache 2.0
and it can't be big (since example data is in the release; no more than a few
MB?) https://www.apache.org/licenses/
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17941
@rxin it was from a while back in SPARK-17865
essentially these are exactly the same in standalone SparkR:
```
sparkR.session()
...
createGlobalTempView(df, "foo")
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17981#discussion_r116650195
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_tree.R ---
@@ -45,6 +45,20 @@ setClass("RandomForestRegressionModel",
representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17981#discussion_r116649550
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_utils.R ---
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
#' @seealso \link{spark.lda}, \link{spark.logit},
#' @seealso \link{spark.mlp},
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17981#discussion_r116649599
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_tree.R ---
@@ -209,4 +209,91 @@ test_that("spark.randomForest", {
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17981#discussion_r116649559
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_utils.R ---
@@ -52,7 +53,8 @@ NULL
#' @seealso \link{spark.gbt}, \link{spark.glm}, \link{glm},
\link{spark.isoreg},
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17981#discussion_r116649021
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_tree.R ---
@@ -45,6 +45,20 @@ setClass("RandomForestRegressionModel",
representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17993
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user liu-zhaokun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17992
[SPARK-20759] SCALA_VERSION in _config.yml should be consistent with
pom.xml
[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20759](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20759)
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17993
[SPARK-20758][SQL] Add Constant propagation optimization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added a rule based on this logic:
- look for expression node with an
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17991
[SPARK-20757][DOC][CORE]Spark timeout several small optimization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. âspark.storage.blockManagerSlaveTimeoutMsâ has not been
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17934
**[Test build #76956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76956/testReport)**
for PR 17934 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17984
Sorry,
surgical test?
I didn't understand .
Can you explain in more detail?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76951/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user heary-cao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17984#discussion_r116642520
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSchedulerCreationSuite.scala
---
@@ -129,4 +129,29 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17946
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17946
Since this blocks 2.2 release, I'll merge it into master and branch-2.2. If
anyone has more comments, I can address them in follow-up work. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116642218
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17934
**[Test build #76956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76956/testReport)**
for PR 17934 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17934#discussion_r116641577
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ object StringIndexer extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #76951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76951/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
Also please remove the remaining of the boilerplate message from your
commit message.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990#discussion_r116641153
--- Diff: common/network-yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -113,6 +116,13 @@
io.netty.**
+
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
**[Test build #76955 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76955/testReport)**
for PR 17990 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17910
@sethah Good point. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user markgrover commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
**[Test build #76954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76954/testReport)**
for PR 17990 at commit
GitHub user markgrover opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
[YARN] [SPARK-20756] yarn-shuffle jar references unshaded guava
and contains scala classes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change ensures that all
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76949/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #76949 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76949/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76953/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
**[Test build #76953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76953/consoleFull)**
for PR 17989 at commit
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
**[Test build #76953 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76953/consoleFull)**
for PR 17989 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76952/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
**[Test build #76952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76952/consoleFull)**
for PR 17989 at commit
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989#discussion_r116631706
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/hiveWriterContainers.scala ---
@@ -70,8 +70,11 @@ private[hive] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
**[Test build #76952 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76952/consoleFull)**
for PR 17989 at commit
GitHub user weiqingy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17989
[SPARK-6628][SQL] Fix ClassCastException when executing sql statement
'insert into' on hbase table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The major issue of SPARK-6628 is:
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17934#discussion_r116631097
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ object StringIndexer extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17988
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76950/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17988
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17988
**[Test build #76950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76950/testReport)**
for PR 17988 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #76951 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76951/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
Github user sharkdtu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17963
@ajbozarth Yes, this case is a big issue in my production cluster, where
run nearly 20,000 applications every day.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17933
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17933
Thanks! Merging to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17988
**[Test build #76950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76950/testReport)**
for PR 17988 at commit
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17988
[DOCS][MINOR] Use consistent names in rollup and cube examples
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Rename `carsDF` to `df` in SparkR `rollup` and `cube` examples.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16598#discussion_r116625893
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2603,6 +2603,21 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17902
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76948/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17902
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17902
**[Test build #76948 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76948/testReport)**
for PR 17902 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Yes. Please open the PR to stop predicate push-down for this corner cases.
Will review it when it is done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17829
Awesome, thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Yes, it looks related with that, in particular, here
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680#discussion_r112285883.
Up to my knowledge, we don't support pushing down filters with
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17944
Thanks a lot @yanboliang !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
1 - 100 of 306 matches
Mail list logo
