Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
Can you also make sure that we do not use a `Seq` for struct writing?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
LGTM! Merging to master/branch-2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999#discussion_r116860631
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1991,6 +1991,22 @@ object functions {
def tan(columnName: String):
Github user bdwyer2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17981#discussion_r116859197
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_tree.R ---
@@ -499,3 +543,199 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"RandomForestClassificationModel", path
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17848#discussion_r116857070
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFRegistration.scala ---
@@ -115,6 +115,22 @@ class UDFRegistration private[sql] (functionRegistry:
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978
LGTM, ping @holdenk @jkbradley if they are interested
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003#discussion_r116854470
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2814,7 +2815,7 @@ setMethod("except",
#' path <- "path/to/file.json"
#' df <- read.json(path)
#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003#discussion_r116853266
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2814,7 +2815,7 @@ setMethod("except",
#' path <- "path/to/file.json"
#' df <- read.json(path)
#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003#discussion_r116853922
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ setMethod("lit", signature("ANY"),
#' @name abs
#' @family normal_funcs
#' @export
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
ping @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935#discussion_r116851595
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ identifierComment
Github user superbobry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17746
@srowen thanks! I've missed the point that 0.13.1 was intentionally merged
into the upcoming release.
@dbtsai could you give an example of the breaking API change between 0.12
and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
**[Test build #76982 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76982/testReport)**
for PR 17990 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18006
**[Test build #76981 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76981/testReport)**
for PR 18006 at commit
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18006
[SQL][TRIVIAL] Lower parser log level to debug
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the parser logs the query it is parsing at `info` level. This is
too high, this
Github user markgrover commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990
Jenkins, re-test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user markgrover commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17990#discussion_r116845002
--- Diff: common/network-yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -113,6 +116,13 @@
io.netty.**
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
**[Test build #76980 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76980/testReport)**
for PR 12646 at commit
Github user dhunziker commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16812
That would remain a workaround though. The uniVocity parser for boolean
supports this as well:
Github user chrishfish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17916
Awesome @HyukjinKwon glad this issue has been resolved permanently ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999#discussion_r116842254
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1991,6 +1991,22 @@ object functions {
def tan(columnName: String):
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999#discussion_r116842201
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1991,6 +1991,22 @@ object functions {
def tan(columnName: String):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
>@icexelloss , yes Arrow supports it but Spark stores timestamps is a
different way which caused some complication. After talking with Holden, we
agreed it was better to keep this PR to simple
GitHub user tpoterba opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
[SPARK-20773][SQL] ParquetWriteSupport.writeFields is quadratic in number
of fields
Fix quadratic List indexing in ParquetWriteSupport.
I noticed this function while profiling some code
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17746
@superbobry see the discussion above? doesn't seem safe to do so
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user superbobry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17746
Hello, are there any plans to backport this into 2.1 branch? The LBFGS and
other fixex in 0.13.1 seem important enough.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76979/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
**[Test build #76979 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76979/testReport)**
for PR 18003 at commit
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17902
Sorry I haven't had time to review this, given it's 100% new code I haven't
have time to give it a proper read through. Hopefully I can find time by end of
month (if not sooner)
---
If your
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
@jinxing64 Apologies for the delays in my response ...
Can you take over this PR review @cloud-fan ? You have been doing the
reviews way more than me on this anyway :-)
Unfortunately I
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r116830282
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -193,8 +216,21 @@ private[spark] object HighlyCompressedMapStatus {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
**[Test build #76979 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76979/testReport)**
for PR 18003 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
@bdwyer2 Thanks for the suggestion. I ran a check on all the R scripts and
fixed the style issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17925
Ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17998
How about `CreateDataSourceTableAsSelectCommand`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18002
@hvanhovell would it be possible to take a look?
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17998
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user krishnakalyan3 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14741
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17998
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76960/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17998
**[Test build #76960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76960/testReport)**
for PR 17998 at commit
Github user bdwyer2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003#discussion_r116820964
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3175,7 +3176,8 @@ setMethod("with",
#' @aliases str,SparkDataFrame-method
#' @family SparkDataFrame
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16648
**[Test build #76978 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76978/testReport)**
for PR 16648 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18002
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18002
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76975/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18002
**[Test build #76975 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76975/testReport)**
for PR 18002 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76965/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17993#discussion_r116817636
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -54,6 +54,59 @@ object ConstantFolding extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17987
**[Test build #76965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76965/testReport)**
for PR 17987 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16648
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76973/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16648
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16648
**[Test build #76973 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76973/testReport)**
for PR 16648 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
After this PR, we can describe it, but the query results are still empty.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18004
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
Thanks for working on it. You need to add it to `FunctionRegistry` and add
the SQL-related test cases to `operators.sql`. Also covers all the edge cases.
For example, `0` that should trigger
GitHub user bOOm-X opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18004
[SPARK-18838][CORE] Introduce blocking strategy for LiveListener
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When the queue of the LiveListener is full, events are dropped in an
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999#discussion_r116812132
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathExpressions.scala
---
@@ -544,6 +544,28 @@ case class Sqrt(child:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999#discussion_r116811946
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathExpressions.scala
---
@@ -544,6 +544,28 @@ case class Sqrt(child:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76970/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
**[Test build #76970 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76970/testReport)**
for PR 17899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76976/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
**[Test build #76976 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76976/testReport)**
for PR 18003 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76972/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #76972 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76972/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
**[Test build #76977 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76977/testReport)**
for PR 17763 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17821
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17763
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76959/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
**[Test build #76959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76959/testReport)**
for PR 17999 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17821
Thanks! Merging to master and 2.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76958/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
**[Test build #76958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76958/testReport)**
for PR 18000 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
In addition, we need to know the limitation of column names in Parquet. See
the related PR in Parquet: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/361
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17739
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76971/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17739
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17739
**[Test build #76971 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76971/testReport)**
for PR 17739 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
Now, the fix is much safer for merging to 2.2. Will review the test case
later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r116805464
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -168,6 +168,11 @@ private[parquet]
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r116805363
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -168,6 +168,11 @@ private[parquet]
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
>@BryanCutler , is Timestamp and Date type supported now with Arrow 0.3?
@icexelloss , yes Arrow supports it but Spark stores timestamps is a
different way which caused some
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
No problem @rxin , I will restructure the tests so that the json data is
local to each test, and ping you when done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r116801592
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -168,6 +168,11 @@ private[parquet]
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116801339
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116801396
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116801366
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r116801167
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,249 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
**[Test build #76976 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76976/testReport)**
for PR 18003 at commit
201 - 300 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
