Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
**[Test build #77227 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77227/testReport)**
for PR 17308 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
@felixcheung I think we may want to distinguish a few cases:
1. For methods that are mainly defined by only one class, e.g., most
function methods for Column, it makes sense to group and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18067
**[Test build #77226 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77226/testReport)**
for PR 18067 at commit
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18067
[SPARK-20849][DOC][SPARKR] Document R DecisionTree
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, add an example for sparkr `decisionTree`
2, document it in user guide
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
**[Test build #77225 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77225/testReport)**
for PR 17308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77220/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77220 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77220/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #77224 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77224/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
@10110346 Hi, you can use the command @gatorsmile mentioned above to
generate the result file.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18066
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77222/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18066
**[Test build #77222 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77222/testReport)**
for PR 18066 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18066
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77219/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77219 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77219/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #77223 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77223/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18066
**[Test build #77222 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77222/testReport)**
for PR 18066 at commit
Github user Gauravshah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
@saulshanabrook looks like #16578 is a superset, trying to invest in that
pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18066
[SPARK-20822][SQL] Generate code to build table cache using ColumnarBatch
and to get value from ColumnVector
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR generates the
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18058
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18051
Maybe I'm missing something completely, but I still don't get the point why
we are removing the `xx-method` link since we are defining methods as S4 using
`setMethod`. Lots of packages have
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18033
@hvanhovell would it be possible to review this or let us know the
appropriate persons for this review?
cc @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77217/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
**[Test build #77217 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77217/testReport)**
for PR 17698 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18040
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18040
merged to master/2.2, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18051
@actuaryzhang - we were just talking this in the other PR. what do you
think?
@zero323 - right, I do agree `?abs-method` is kind of a big problem...
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18046
**[Test build #77221 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77221/testReport)**
for PR 18046 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77220 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77220/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77219 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77219/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967#discussion_r117892629
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormula.scala
---
@@ -37,6 +37,42 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
*/
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
@yanboliang I updated the example in the param doc. I hope it is clear now
that it is `alphabetDesc` that drops the same category as R. That is, RFormula
with `alphabetDesc` drops the first
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18048
**[Test build #77218 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77218/testReport)**
for PR 18048 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18048
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77215/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77215 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77215/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
Github user jsoltren closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jsoltren commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17762
To close the loop here: I'm going to rework these ideas into a new JIRA
that I'll file, to track *total* memory usage in the UI.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
**[Test build #77217 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77217/testReport)**
for PR 17698 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18058
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18058
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
**[Test build #77214 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77214/testReport)**
for PR 17698 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77214/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18035
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18035
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77216/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18035
**[Test build #77216 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77216/testReport)**
for PR 18035 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18058
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user facaiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18058
Thanks, @yanboliang.
Do you have any suggestion about testing the parameter?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
**[Test build #77213 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77213/testReport)**
for PR 17698 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77213/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18048
ping @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18035
**[Test build #77216 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77216/testReport)**
for PR 18035 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77215 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77215/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18035
@felixcheung I'm OK to keep as it is, thanks for your clarification. What
about other changes in this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
**[Test build #77214 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77214/testReport)**
for PR 17698 at commit
Github user 10110346 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18054
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18054
Could you close the PR manually?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967#discussion_r117878731
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormula.scala
---
@@ -37,6 +37,42 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17941
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77211/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18054
Thanks, merging to 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17941
**[Test build #77211 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77211/testReport)**
for PR 17941 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17941
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18054
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
**[Test build #77213 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77213/testReport)**
for PR 17698 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17984
ok,
It does not produce value, that is junk code.
close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user heary-cao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17984
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967#discussion_r117877363
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormula.scala
---
@@ -37,6 +37,42 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77209/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
**[Test build #77209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77209/testReport)**
for PR 17967 at commit
Github user eatoncys commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18060
@srowen The other parameters are validated at some other places, for
example, the --executor-memory parameter is validated at
org.apache.spark.memory.UnifiedMemoryManager$.getMaxMemory, the app
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
**[Test build #77212 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77212/testReport)**
for PR 17723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77212/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user wujianping10043419 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18061
@srowen But the check result in the abnormal exit, because an irrelevant
parameters.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18015
@srowen
Help to merge to master and modify the status about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20785.Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18063
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17941
**[Test build #77211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77211/testReport)**
for PR 17941 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
**[Test build #77212 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77212/testReport)**
for PR 17723 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
**[Test build #77210 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77210/testReport)**
for PR 17723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77210/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17941
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
**[Test build #77210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77210/testReport)**
for PR 17723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18046
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77208/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18046
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18046
**[Test build #77208 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77208/testReport)**
for PR 18046 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967#discussion_r117873500
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormula.scala
---
@@ -37,6 +37,42 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
*/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967#discussion_r117872391
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormula.scala
---
@@ -37,6 +37,42 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18040
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77205/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18040
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18040
**[Test build #77205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77205/testReport)**
for PR 18040 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r117871475
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -523,6 +524,14 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
1 - 100 of 464 matches
Mail list logo
