Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257
**[Test build #77915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77915/testReport)**
for PR 18257 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18236
How about just updating the comment of this function to explain the
behavior we have now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
ok, I'll also check again. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266
**[Test build #77908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77908/testReport)**
for PR 18266 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77908/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17645
OK. I'll close it for now and try to merge it with
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862.
Thanks for the comment from @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hhbyyh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17645
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257#discussion_r121313742
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameRangeSuite.scala ---
@@ -191,6 +191,17 @@ class DataFrameRangeSuite extends QueryTest
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266#discussion_r121313654
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/Metadata.scala ---
@@ -273,6 +273,9 @@ class MetadataBuilder {
/** Puts a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #77914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77914/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
Hi @maropu , I just did some simple search, and found many other places
also related to duplicate columns. e.g. `InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand`,
`PartitioningUtils.normalizePartitionSpec`,
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17583#discussion_r121312651
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/FuncTransformer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18082
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17583#discussion_r121312459
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/FuncTransformer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257#discussion_r121312457
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameRangeSuite.scala ---
@@ -191,6 +191,17 @@ class DataFrameRangeSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18230
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18230
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77910/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18082
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18230
**[Test build #77910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77910/testReport)**
for PR 18230 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
LGTM except for two comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #77913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77913/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121311872
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnVector.java
---
@@ -518,19 +519,13 @@ private void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77906/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257
**[Test build #77906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77906/testReport)**
for PR 18257 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121311563
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -43,14 +43,12 @@
private byte[] byteData;
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77911/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
**[Test build #77911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77911/testReport)**
for PR 18271 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
@viirya @kiszk good catch! fixed by using long to store offset and size.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
**[Test build #77912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77912/testReport)**
for PR 18260 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
**[Test build #77911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77911/testReport)**
for PR 18271 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18128
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18128
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77909/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18128
**[Test build #77909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77909/testReport)**
for PR 18128 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77905/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
**[Test build #77905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77905/testReport)**
for PR 18260 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77900/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
**[Test build #77900 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77900/testReport)**
for PR 18260 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77904/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18082
**[Test build #77904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77904/testReport)**
for PR 18082 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121307879
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -42,15 +42,13 @@
// Array for each type.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18230
**[Test build #77910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77910/testReport)**
for PR 18230 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121307570
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -366,55 +364,22 @@ public double getDouble(int
Github user saturday-shi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18230
No, I don't mean to insist on my opinion. I'm just curious to know the
reason for the changing (as it looks like another point fix).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77903/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121306993
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -42,15 +42,13 @@
// Array for each type.
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121306979
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -42,15 +42,13 @@
// Array for each type.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
**[Test build #77903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77903/testReport)**
for PR 18260 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121306584
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -42,15 +42,13 @@
// Array for each type.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18128
**[Test build #77909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77909/testReport)**
for PR 18128 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266
**[Test build #77908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77908/testReport)**
for PR 18266 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271#discussion_r121305976
--- Diff: docs/building-spark.md ---
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ The run-tests script also can be limited to a specific
Python version or a speci
##
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77907/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
**[Test build #77907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77907/testReport)**
for PR 18271 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77902/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
**[Test build #77902 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77902/testReport)**
for PR 18260 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266
retest please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77901/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18199
**[Test build #77901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77901/testReport)**
for PR 18199 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
**[Test build #77907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77907/testReport)**
for PR 18271 at commit
GitHub user wangyum opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
[MINOR][DOCS] Improve docs to Running R Tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`install.packages(testthat)` should be `install.packages("testthat")`,
otherwise:
```
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121303857
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -438,10 +401,8 @@ public void
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121303697
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -438,10 +401,8 @@ public void
Github user darionyaphet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18236
@rxin @HyukjinKwon Thank you looking into this PR :D
Maybe I don't make it clearly : `GenericRowWithSchema` fetch field with
field name and the field name shouldn't null or empty .
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257#discussion_r121302955
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -347,8 +347,12 @@ case class RangeExec(range:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257
**[Test build #77906 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77906/testReport)**
for PR 18257 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18258
cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
**[Test build #77905 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77905/testReport)**
for PR 18260 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18230
I don't agree with your point of view, there's already some potential
issues regarding to internal configurations, either they will potentially lead
to unexpected state, either they're
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
LGTM except for one comment, pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17955
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17955
I've merged this to master (2.3.0).
Thanks to everyone who helped to review. If there is additional feedback at
this point then I'll address it in a quick followup.
---
If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18082
**[Test build #77904 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77904/testReport)**
for PR 18082 at commit
Github user saturday-shi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18230
@jerryshao Sorry for the delay.
Currently, Spark checkpoint ALL the configurations no matter it is
"internal" or not. So we have to reload ones that should be updated at
launching.
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121298160
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -659,18 +659,18 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
**[Test build #77903 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77903/testReport)**
for PR 18260 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121297255
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -438,10 +401,9 @@ public void
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257
I see, @cloud-fan. I'll update like that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260
**[Test build #77902 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77902/testReport)**
for PR 18260 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121296861
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -366,55 +364,23 @@ public double getDouble(int
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121296826
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -438,10 +401,9 @@ public void
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121296821
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -366,55 +364,23 @@ public double getDouble(int
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18238
@HyukjinKwon I agree with you ,but i think if add `trim`', it would be
better
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18260#discussion_r121296775
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -438,10 +401,9 @@ public void
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18259
@srowen Thanks. I have checked in the whole project,there are no more
related changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18257
is it very hard? Seems we can just output 0-partition RDD for invalid
parameters in `RangeExec`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18009
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
