Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
**[Test build #78031 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78031/testReport)**
for PR 17865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78022/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
**[Test build #78022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78022/testReport)**
for PR 18231 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865#discussion_r121859623
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -189,15 +210,15 @@ def _():
}
for _name, _doc in _functions.items():
-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18296
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78030/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18296
**[Test build #78030 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78030/testReport)**
for PR 18296 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18296
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18296
**[Test build #78030 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78030/testReport)**
for PR 18296 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78029/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
**[Test build #78029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78029/testReport)**
for PR 17865 at commit
GitHub user 10110346 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18296
[SPARK-21090][core]Optimize the unified memory manager code
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1.In `acquireStorageMemory`, when the MemoryMode is OFF_HEAP ,the
`maxMemory`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
**[Test build #78029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78029/testReport)**
for PR 17865 at commit
Github user map222 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865#discussion_r121857727
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -92,14 +98,16 @@ def _():
_functions_1_4 = {
# unary math functions
'acos': 'Computes
Github user map222 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865#discussion_r121857687
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -189,15 +210,15 @@ def _():
}
for _name, _doc in _functions.items():
-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78024/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
**[Test build #78024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78024/testReport)**
for PR 17862 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18295
**[Test build #78028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78028/testReport)**
for PR 18295 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18295
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18295
[SPARK-21085] [SQL] Failed to read the partitioned table created by Spark
2.1
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before the PR, Spark is unable to read the partitioned
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18294
**[Test build #78027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78027/testReport)**
for PR 18294 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18294
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18294#discussion_r121855663
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/describe.sql.out ---
@@ -127,8 +127,9 @@ Providerparquet
Num Buckets
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18294#discussion_r121855587
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/describe.sql.out ---
@@ -127,8 +127,9 @@ Providerparquet
Num Buckets
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18294#discussion_r121855563
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/describe.sql.out ---
@@ -127,8 +127,9 @@ Providerparquet
Num Buckets
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18292
**[Test build #78026 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78026/testReport)**
for PR 18292 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18294
**[Test build #78025 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78025/testReport)**
for PR 18294 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18294
[SPARK-21089] [SQL] Fix DESC EXTENDED/FORMATTED to Show Table Properties
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since both table properties and storage properties share
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18292#discussion_r121855001
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -218,6 +224,49 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
@hhbyyh Thanks for doing the extra work to use the new aggregator here. I
do think it's better to separate those changes from this one, though. There is
actually more that needs to be done for the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
**[Test build #78024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78024/testReport)**
for PR 17862 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18084
**[Test build #78023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78023/testReport)**
for PR 18084 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
**[Test build #78021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78021/testReport)**
for PR 18271 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78021/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150#discussion_r121846539
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1370,22 +1393,42 @@ class DAGScheduler(
*/
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
Merge the change from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17645 into a
single change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
For me, it looks good. I assume we consider
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271#discussion_r121768881 but it looks
fine as is too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18291
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78020/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18291
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18291
**[Test build #78020 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78020/testReport)**
for PR 18291 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
**[Test build #78022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78022/testReport)**
for PR 18231 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78016/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150
**[Test build #78016 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78016/testReport)**
for PR 18150 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18271
**[Test build #78021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78021/testReport)**
for PR 18271 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150#discussion_r121844707
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1370,22 +1393,42 @@ class DAGScheduler(
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78015/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18150
**[Test build #78015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78015/testReport)**
for PR 18150 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267
+1 We should add a test for this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18269#discussion_r121843329
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InMemoryFileIndex.scala
---
@@ -248,60 +245,92 @@ object InMemoryFileIndex
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18269#discussion_r121843352
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InMemoryFileIndex.scala
---
@@ -248,60 +245,92 @@ object InMemoryFileIndex
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18269#discussion_r121843175
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InMemoryFileIndex.scala
---
@@ -248,60 +245,92 @@ object InMemoryFileIndex
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18269#discussion_r121843022
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InMemoryFileIndex.scala
---
@@ -248,60 +245,92 @@ object InMemoryFileIndex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18291
**[Test build #78020 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78020/testReport)**
for PR 18291 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18291
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78017/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
**[Test build #78017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78017/testReport)**
for PR 18231 at commit
Github user darionyaphet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18288
@srowen It seems OK. `FileInputFormat` will use a comma-separated paths to
be set as the list of inputs for the job.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user zuowang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11420
I'm not, could you work to resolve it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18206
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78014/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18206
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18206
**[Test build #78014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78014/testReport)**
for PR 18206 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78012/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
**[Test build #78012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78012/testReport)**
for PR 17758 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78011/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15178
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15178
**[Test build #78011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78011/testReport)**
for PR 15178 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18293
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18293
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78007/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18293
**[Test build #78007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78007/testReport)**
for PR 18293 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78019/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
**[Test build #78019 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78019/testReport)**
for PR 17862 at commit
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Thoughts - @budde @brkyvz ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18292
LGTM except one comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18292#discussion_r121839586
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -218,6 +224,49 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18205
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18205
thanks, merging to master/2.2!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18205#discussion_r121838668
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PruneFileSourcePartitions.scala
---
@@ -59,8 +60,11 @@ private[sql] object
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075
LGTM except some style comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r121838120
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -233,10 +222,124 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r121837792
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ColumnarBatchScan.scala
---
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ private[sql] trait ColumnarBatchScan
Github user WeichenXu123 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16576
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r121837609
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ColumnarBatchScan.scala
---
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ private[sql] trait ColumnarBatchScan
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18292
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r121837371
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GeneratedProjectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +83,58 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18292
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78008/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18292
**[Test build #78008 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78008/testReport)**
for PR 18292 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r121837140
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GeneratedProjectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +83,58 @@ class
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18281#discussion_r121836808
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/OneVsRest.scala ---
@@ -325,8 +343,13 @@ final class OneVsRest @Since("1.4.0") (
1 - 100 of 512 matches
Mail list logo
