Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18413
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18413
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78587/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18413
**[Test build #78587 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78587/testReport)**
for PR 18413 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
**[Test build #78592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78592/testReport)**
for PR 18334 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78591/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
**[Test build #78591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78591/testReport)**
for PR 17451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78586/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
**[Test build #78586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78586/testReport)**
for PR 17865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78589/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
**[Test build #78589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78589/testReport)**
for PR 17451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18400
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78585/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18400
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18400
**[Test build #78585 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78585/testReport)**
for PR 18400 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
**[Test build #78591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78591/testReport)**
for PR 17451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78590/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13506
sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
**[Test build #78589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78589/testReport)**
for PR 17451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9518
**[Test build #78588 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78588/testReport)**
for PR 9518 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18413
**[Test build #78587 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78587/testReport)**
for PR 18413 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
**[Test build #78586 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78586/testReport)**
for PR 17865 at commit
Github user map222 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865#discussion_r123912061
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -969,8 +1005,8 @@ def months_between(date1, date2):
"""
Returns the number of months
Github user map222 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17865
@HyukjinKwon I think I addressed all of your comments. Thank you for your
detailed review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
I think I am used to the symtoms here as I have tested many cases here. Let
me try to organise and send a post to dev mailing list.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18400
**[Test build #78585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78585/testReport)**
for PR 18400 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18400
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18413
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78584/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18413
**[Test build #78584 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78584/testReport)**
for PR 18413 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18413
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18413
**[Test build #78584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78584/testReport)**
for PR 18413 at commit
Github user szalai1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17435
@holdenk Thanks for reviewing it. I fixed the style issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18411
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78583/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18411
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18411
**[Test build #78583 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78583/testReport)**
for PR 18411 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
merged to master, thanks!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366
hmm, comment not showing up:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18366/files#r123891161
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18411
**[Test build #78583 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78583/testReport)**
for PR 18411 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18411
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18414
please fix up the PR title: http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user wesm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Is your conda up to date? It's a best practice to always update to the
latest conda
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
LGTM. The update looks good. Thanks for the thorough testing. We could also
post a note on the dev list about this change and especially ask people who use
`dapply` or `gapply` or the old `RDD`
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
it's because of this
```
.SSL verification error: hostname 'conda.binstar.org' doesn't match either
of 'anaconda.com', 'anacondacloud.com', 'anacondacloud.org', 'binstar.org',
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78582/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #78582 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78582/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78581/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78581 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78581/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user cenyuhai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193#discussion_r123903846
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveStrategies.scala ---
@@ -139,6 +138,54 @@ class DetermineTableStats(session: SparkSession)
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17864
Shall we pay extra attention to the Int case? E.g. input column contains
Double.Nan,
1,
2.
The current implementation will return surrogate as 1.5. I'm not sure if
it's the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #78582 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78582/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Could you please add another case when no column is matched into
`query_regex_column.sql`? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405#discussion_r123901486
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ public void putNotNull(int rowId)
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405#discussion_r123901481
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ public void putNotNull(int rowId) {
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405#discussion_r123901460
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnVector.java
---
@@ -993,22 +1006,25 @@ public ColumnVector
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Seems it already asks to search in the conda-forge channel?
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/e44697606f429b01808c1a22cb44cb5b89585c5c/dev/run-pip-tests#L86
---
If your project is set
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405#discussion_r123901471
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OnHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@
private int[] arrayLengths;
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405#discussion_r123901467
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/OffHeapColumnVector.java
---
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@
private long lengthData;
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r123901447
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/query_regex_column.sql.out ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405#discussion_r123901448
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnVector.java
---
@@ -62,10 +62,18 @@
* in number of elements, not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r123901251
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -795,6 +795,11 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18410
(I believe the discussion here might be helpful for pip packaging failure -
`https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#issuecomment-310894657`)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r123901234
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1191,6 +1191,12 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
def col(colName:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
I believe the pointer is the right place up to my knowledge, via ...
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/e44697606f429b01808c1a22cb44cb5b89585c5c/dev/run-tests#L23
->
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
I added all suggested one and took out 15405 and 17401 per requested. I
guess the author should be responsive and I took out 17716 before. I think it
is unfair to take out this again.
---
If
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
I added all suggested one and took out 15405 and 17716 per requested. I
guess the author should be responsive and I took out 17716 before. I think it
is unfair to take out this again.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78581/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user wesm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
I only see the package referenced here
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/e44697606f429b01808c1a22cb44cb5b89585c5c/dev/run-pip-tests#L86
-- where is the packaging build that @srowen is referencing
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Let's keep the following PRs open, because I believe they're good to have
and the authors will soon be responding:
#15405
#17401
#17716
Also, I'd suggest we add the
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716
ping @hvanhovell Are you still working on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Would you mind opening a PR for this? I guess updating it would probably be
done by a followup but this one sounds rather a semi-hotfix. If both timeout
and adding chennel are all we need, I
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15405
ping @JonathanTaws Please let me know once this PR is ready for review,
thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Suggest adding:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14739
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17139
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17445
Github user wesm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
You must add the conda-forge channel; I also recommend increasing the
timeout for conda which helps make builds more stable, see:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18415
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18415
merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18415
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user JinsYin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18415
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78577/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18415
**[Test build #78577 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78577/testReport)**
for PR 18415 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
**[Test build #78580 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78580/testReport)**
for PR 18417 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78580/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
cc @srowen, @vanzin, @gatorsmile and @jiangxb1987 who I believe are
interested in this PR. Could you take a look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
**[Test build #78580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78580/testReport)**
for PR 18417 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Please let me know if any author is active on any PR. Let me take them out.
I picked up inclusively. My point here is to close inactive PRs and leave PRs
that wait for a review. Leave any
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Please let me know if any author is active on any PR. Let me take them out.
I picked up inclusively. My point here is to close inactive PRs and leave PRs
that wait for a review. Leave any
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Please let me know if any author is active on any PR. Let me take them out.
I picked up inclusively.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
[INFRA] Close stale PRs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to close stale PRs, mostly the same instances with
Github user bOOm-X commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
please test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18268
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78579/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18268
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78578/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78578/
Test FAILed.
---
101 - 200 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
