Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681#discussion_r124183913
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/functions.scala
---
@@ -46,27 +46,53 @@ case class CreateFunctionCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78676/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429
**[Test build #78676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78676/testReport)**
for PR 18429 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174#discussion_r124182713
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillWriter.java
---
@@ -61,6 +65,9 @@ public
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78681/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78681/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18182
@kiszk
yes,
I tried other SQL algorithms, and the results showed that,
But for this hard coding, it is still modified to be configurable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
**[Test build #78683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78683/testReport)**
for PR 17681 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681#discussion_r124181223
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/functions.scala
---
@@ -46,27 +46,53 @@ case class CreateFunctionCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78679/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78679/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78678/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418
**[Test build #78678 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78678/testReport)**
for PR 18418 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18426
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18426
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78670/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18426
**[Test build #78670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78670/testReport)**
for PR 18426 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
(17211 is a dupe)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681#discussion_r124179677
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1458,6 +1458,8 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Sure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78673/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78673 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78673/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18417
Three more PRs?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17830
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14742
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17211
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r124178671
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -239,18 +239,20 @@ class SparkSqlParserSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429
**[Test build #78682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78682/testReport)**
for PR 18429 at commit
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429#discussion_r124178339
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/EliminateDistinceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78672/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
**[Test build #78672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78672/testReport)**
for PR 11994 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r124178194
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -24,18 +24,23 @@ import
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429#discussion_r124177929
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/EliminateDistinceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r124177691
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -101,19 +101,30 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r124177638
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -101,19 +101,30 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429
**[Test build #78680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78680/testReport)**
for PR 18429 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78681 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78681/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r124177416
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -101,19 +101,30 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r124177318
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -101,19 +101,30 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429
Hi @gatorsmile ,
Thanks for the comments. I have just pushed code changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418
**[Test build #78678 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78678/testReport)**
for PR 18418 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78679 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78679/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18235
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78671/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418#discussion_r124177003
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -342,19 +343,38 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18235
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18235
**[Test build #78671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78671/testReport)**
for PR 18235 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r124175975
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ object CatalogStorageFormat {
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421
Please update the PR title.
> [SPARK-21213][SQL] Support collecting partition-level statistics:
rowCount and sizeInBytes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429#discussion_r124175811
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -152,6 +154,16 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429#discussion_r124175744
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -152,6 +154,16 @@ abstract class
Github user MaheshIBM commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
This does not seem like a timeout issue, the certificate CN and the what is
used as the hostname are not matching. So clearly the client downloads the
certificate but is not able to verify (no
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
**[Test build #78677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78677/testReport)**
for PR 18416 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429#discussion_r124175593
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429#discussion_r124175562
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/dsl/package.scala ---
@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ package object dsl {
def last(e:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18416
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14431#discussion_r124175513
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1465,10 +1464,10 @@ setMethod("dapplyCollect",
#'
#' Result
#' -
-#' Model (Intercept)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78675/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78675/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429
**[Test build #78676 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78676/testReport)**
for PR 18429 at commit
Github user kiszk closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18042
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18429
[SPARK-21222] Move elimination of Distinct clause from analyzer to optimizer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move elimination of Distinct clause from analyzer to
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17084
gentle ping @actuaryzhang, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18425
@cloud-fan could you please review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12414
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78674/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12414
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12414
**[Test build #78674 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78674/testReport)**
for PR 12414 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12414#discussion_r124173488
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormulaSuite.scala ---
@@ -129,6 +129,23 @@ class RFormulaSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78675/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12414#discussion_r124172642
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormula.scala
---
@@ -163,12 +163,20 @@ class RFormula @Since("1.5.0") (@Since("1.5.0")
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18394
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18426#discussion_r124171594
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/IncrementalExecution.scala
---
@@ -47,11 +47,16 @@ class IncrementalExecution(
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113#discussion_r124171370
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -529,4 +529,59 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18406
@robert3005 would you please elaborate the usage scenario of your proposal,
AFAIK Spark internally doesn't have such requirement.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12414
**[Test build #78674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78674/testReport)**
for PR 12414 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
**[Test build #78673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78673/testReport)**
for PR 18405 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18405
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028#discussion_r124170473
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/SharedParamsCodeGen.scala
---
@@ -167,6 +168,8 @@ private[shared] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18425
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18425
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78669/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18425
**[Test build #78669 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78669/testReport)**
for PR 18425 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418#discussion_r124168400
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -342,19 +343,38 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
**[Test build #78672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78672/testReport)**
for PR 11994 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18422
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028#discussion_r124166126
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/SharedParamsCodeGen.scala
---
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ private[shared] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78663/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421
**[Test build #78663 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78663/testReport)**
for PR 18421 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113#discussion_r124165462
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -529,4 +529,59 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18418#discussion_r124165135
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -342,19 +343,38 @@ case class
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113#discussion_r124165102
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -145,6 +146,74 @@ private[scheduler] class BlacklistTracker (
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18235
**[Test build #78671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78671/testReport)**
for PR 18235 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18368
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18368
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78667/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18368
**[Test build #78667 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78667/testReport)**
for PR 18368 at commit
1 - 100 of 592 matches
Mail list logo
