Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80523/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
**[Test build #80518 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80518/testReport)**
for PR 18810 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18736#discussion_r132618802
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/HashingTF.scala
---
@@ -80,20 +82,31 @@ class HashingTF @Since("1.4.0") (@Since("1.4.0")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80517/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899
**[Test build #80517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80517/testReport)**
for PR 18899 at commit
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18806
@srowen Help review the code,Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
I think `BusQueue` is a good abstraction, but we can still simplify other
parts. My proposal:
```
// Do we need a better name like ListenesGroup? it's very similar to the
previous
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80521/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
**[Test build #80521 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80521/testReport)**
for PR 18907 at commit
Github user eatoncys commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810#discussion_r132616342
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -572,6 +572,14 @@ object SQLConf {
"disable logging or
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18900
+1, similar to `CatalogTable.createTime`, we should have a
`CatalogTablePartition.createTime`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
**[Test build #80522 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80522/testReport)**
for PR 18810 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
**[Test build #80521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80521/testReport)**
for PR 18907 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
**[Test build #80520 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80520/testReport)**
for PR 18907 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80520/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18843
LGTM except one question, thanks for the fix!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user eatoncys commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810#discussion_r132616033
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala
---
@@ -149,4 +150,56 @@ class WholeStageCodegenSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18843#discussion_r132615896
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -844,24 +844,39 @@ object SQLConf {
.stringConf
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18843#discussion_r132615780
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -844,24 +844,39 @@ object SQLConf {
.stringConf
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18843#discussion_r132615759
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -1139,9 +1154,14 @@ class SQLConf extends Serializable with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907
**[Test build #80520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80520/testReport)**
for PR 18907 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907#discussion_r132615143
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -412,6 +412,11 @@ case class CatalogRelation(
Github user goldmedal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132615092
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -186,6 +186,18 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132614716
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -659,13 +660,19 @@ case class StructsToJson(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132614534
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JsonExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -590,4 +590,24 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132614524
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JsonExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -590,4 +590,24 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132614326
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JsonFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -186,6 +186,18 @@ class JsonFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132614036
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -3121,8 +3121,9 @@ object functions {
to_json(e,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132614025
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -3106,9 +3106,9 @@ object functions {
}
/**
- *
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132614002
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -3090,9 +3090,9 @@ object functions {
}
/**
- *
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132613913
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -659,13 +660,19 @@ case class StructsToJson(
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
I test the performance on a small data, the value in the following table is
the average duration in seconds:
|numColums| Old Mean | Old Median | New Mean | New Median |
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18756
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80515/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18756
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18914
**[Test build #80519 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80519/testReport)**
for PR 18914 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18756
**[Test build #80515 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80515/testReport)**
for PR 18756 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18914
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18914
The change looks fine. @HyukjinKwon @gatorsmile Can you help trigger
jenkins? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132613088
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -659,13 +660,19 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18907#discussion_r132611451
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -412,6 +412,11 @@ case class CatalogRelation(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
LGTM except for few comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810#discussion_r132611417
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala
---
@@ -149,4 +150,56 @@ class WholeStageCodegenSuite extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810#discussion_r132611346
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -572,6 +572,14 @@ object SQLConf {
"disable logging or
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810#discussion_r132611289
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala
---
@@ -149,4 +150,56 @@ class WholeStageCodegenSuite extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810#discussion_r132611153
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -370,6 +370,14 @@ case class
Github user eatoncys commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810#discussion_r132610861
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -572,6 +572,14 @@ object SQLConf {
"disable logging or
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899
Hi @sethah , the unit test is added. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
**[Test build #80518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80518/testReport)**
for PR 18810 at commit
Github user eatoncys commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810#discussion_r132610543
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala
---
@@ -149,4 +149,75 @@ class WholeStageCodegenSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18913
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80512/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18913
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18913
**[Test build #80512 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80512/testReport)**
for PR 18913 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899#discussion_r132610165
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -1012,6 +1012,10 @@ object MimaExcludes {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899
**[Test build #80517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80517/testReport)**
for PR 18899 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18899#discussion_r132610049
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Vectors.scala ---
@@ -635,8 +642,9 @@ class SparseVector @Since("2.0.0") (
nnz
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875#discussion_r132609949
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -659,13 +660,19 @@ case class StructsToJson(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17583
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
**[Test build #80516 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80516/testReport)**
for PR 18810 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80516/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17583
**[Test build #80514 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80514/testReport)**
for PR 17583 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17583
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80514/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
**[Test build #80516 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80516/testReport)**
for PR 18810 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18897
I think this RPC layer could also serve for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18877
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18877
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80511/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18877
**[Test build #80511 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80511/testReport)**
for PR 18877 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18756
**[Test build #80515 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80515/testReport)**
for PR 18756 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18914
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80509/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
**[Test build #80509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80509/testReport)**
for PR 18519 at commit
GitHub user heary-cao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18914
[MINOR][SQL][TEST]no uncache table in joinsuite test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
this may be a small mistake, let's fix it. thanks.
## How was this
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
@hhbyyh Yes, I will test the performance.
Btw, the median computation by call `stat.approxQuantile` will also
transform df into rdd before aggregation. see
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18912
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18912
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80510/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18912
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18912
**[Test build #80510 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80510/testReport)**
for PR 18912 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18912
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17583
**[Test build #80514 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80514/testReport)**
for PR 17583 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17583#discussion_r132605415
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/FuncTransformer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user KevinZwx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18903
@zsxwing @brkyvz Can you review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18901
LGTM generally, CC @vanzin to review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18901#discussion_r132604202
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -219,8 +219,10 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18724
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18724
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80507/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18724
**[Test build #80507 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80507/testReport)**
for PR 18724 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18724#discussion_r132600534
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -1007,4 +1007,23 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80513/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #80513 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80513/testReport)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #80513 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80513/testReport)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18837#discussion_r132597784
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -529,18 +570,120 @@
1 - 100 of 411 matches
Mail list logo
