Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
@yanboliang I will update ASAP, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
@WeichenXu123 I left some minor comments, otherwise, LGTM. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133120700
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133120739
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/SummarizerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,619 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133109722
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133115762
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133115706
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133120087
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/SummarizerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,619 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133111870
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18938
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18938
**[Test build #80658 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80658/testReport)**
for PR 18938 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18938
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80658/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18938
IMHO, other database(-like) systems prevent this name duplication in
temporary table/view, so it seems we might do so along with them.
```
// postgresql case
postgres=# create table s0
Github user liyichao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18093
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18938
**[Test build #80658 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80658/testReport)**
for PR 18938 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18093
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133119397
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18934
Tried to merge to Spark 2.1, but I hit a conflict. Thus, please let me know
if anybody wants it in 2.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18934
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18934
Thanks! Merging to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
Eh, I meant that it may be possible to get the mean values purely using
DataFrame API. (convert missingValue/NaN to null) in one pass, so we may need
to check the performance comparison. But I guess
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18934
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18946
LGTM except two minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18946#discussion_r133118690
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -573,4 +578,47 @@ class DataFrameAggregateSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18946
**[Test build #80657 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80657/testReport)**
for PR 18946 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18946
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18946#discussion_r133118490
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,13 +17,18 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
Github user neoremind commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18922
@zsxwing Would you mind verifying the patch for me? I notice you have
contributed to rpc module in spark. Many thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18926
LGTM except for the comment above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18926#discussion_r133116060
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1220,6 +1220,13 @@ def test_rand_functions(self):
rndn2 = df.select('key',
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18930#discussion_r133117021
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/jsonExpressions.scala
---
@@ -359,14 +359,14 @@ case class
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818
@viirya @gatorsmile I have addressed your comments, could you take another
look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user aray commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818#discussion_r133116720
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -465,7 +475,7 @@ abstract class BinaryComparison
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18930
**[Test build #80656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80656/testReport)**
for PR 18930 at commit
Github user jmchung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18930#discussion_r133116488
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -2034,4 +2034,13 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80652/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133116269
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
**[Test build #80652 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80652/testReport)**
for PR 18943 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133115997
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
@WeichenXu123 Thanks! Looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r133114092
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user VinceShieh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18936
Yes, they are not the only place, but we only tested on the dense dataset
and got the performance data shown above. We are conservative on sparse data,
so keep the sparse path the way it was.
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
@viirya Sure! comment updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
Sorry can we make the performance data clear? Currently it doesn't say what
the unit of the numbers is.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
**[Test build #80655 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80655/testReport)**
for PR 18944 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18930#discussion_r133112441
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -2034,4 +2034,13 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
**[Test build #80654 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80654/testReport)**
for PR 18931 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80653/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
**[Test build #80653 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80653/testReport)**
for PR 18902 at commit
Github user LiShuMing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18905
@jerryshao Thanks for your replies! I will do such things then:
1. "it is good to change to other directories (is yarn internally relying
on it)?"
I think the recovery path(local
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
ping @MLnick ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user DonnyZone commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18946
@gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80651/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
**[Test build #80651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80651/testReport)**
for PR 18944 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18946
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user DonnyZone opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18946
[SPARK-19471][SQL]AggregationIterator does not initialize the generated
result projection before using it
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up PR that
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
**[Test build #80653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80653/testReport)**
for PR 18902 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887#discussion_r133102376
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -35,11 +38,14 @@ import
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887#discussion_r133102774
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -117,17 +123,38 @@ private[history] class
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887#discussion_r133104552
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -220,6 +220,13 @@ The history server can be configured as follows:
Number of threads that will be used by
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18934
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80649/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18934
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18934
**[Test build #80649 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80649/testReport)**
for PR 18934 at commit
Github user KevinZwx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18903
I added some tests in `DataFrameTimeWindowingSuite`, please have a look
@brkyvz
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18945
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user logannc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18945
Add option to convert nullable int columns to float columns in toPandâ¦
â¦as to prevent needless Exceptions during routine use.
Add the `strict=True` kwarg to DataFrame.toPandas to allow
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80647/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818
**[Test build #80647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80647/testReport)**
for PR 18818 at commit
Github user poplav commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18942
Looking back at this. I simply cherry picked the commit from the branch,
there appears to be more to this backport.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80648/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
**[Test build #80648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80648/testReport)**
for PR 18931 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
**[Test build #80652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80652/testReport)**
for PR 18943 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18760
@jiangxb1987 Hi xingbo, can you give me some advise about this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
Argh, forgot to update the tests...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
**[Test build #80651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80651/testReport)**
for PR 18944 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944#discussion_r133096415
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreLazyInitializationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
---
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18944
[SPARK-21732][SQL]Lazily init hive metastore client
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes the codes to lazily init hive metastore client so that we
can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80646/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
**[Test build #80646 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80646/testReport)**
for PR 18664 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
**[Test build #80650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80650/testReport)**
for PR 18943 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80650/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
**[Test build #80650 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80650/testReport)**
for PR 18943 at commit
Github user poplav commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Hi, All. I am trying to get this included into Spark 2.1.1. I opened a PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18942.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
[SPARK-21731][build] Upgrade scalastyle to 0.9.
This version fixes a few issues in the import order checker; it provides
better error messages, and detects more improper ordering (thus the need
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18943
Will also test with maven once sbt tests pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18934
**[Test build #80649 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80649/testReport)**
for PR 18934 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
**[Test build #80648 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80648/testReport)**
for PR 18931 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80645/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18942
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
1 - 100 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
