Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18958#discussion_r134148287
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnVector.java
---
@@ -970,30 +458,14 @@ public final int
Github user DonnyZone commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18986
@gatorsmile For this issue, I think the behevior in PromoteStrings rule is
reasonable, but there are problems in underlying converter UTF8String.
As described in PR-15880
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18968#discussion_r134147697
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -138,46 +138,56 @@ case class Not(child:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18984
Here is the context I got:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702 broke the documentation build in
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-docs/.
```
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18968
**[Test build #80920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80920/testReport)**
for PR 18968 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18958#discussion_r134147099
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -307,64 +293,70 @@ public void update(int ordinal,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18968#discussion_r134147067
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -138,46 +138,63 @@ case class Not(child:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18958#discussion_r134146811
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnVector.java
---
@@ -970,30 +458,14 @@ public final int
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18968#discussion_r134146523
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -138,46 +138,63 @@ case class Not(child:
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18984
how long has this been failing in this way? i'll take a closer look
tomorrow afternoon.
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Hyukjin Kwon
wrote:
>
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17951
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18958#discussion_r134145753
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -307,64 +293,69 @@ public void update(int ordinal,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19002
**[Test build #80919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80919/testReport)**
for PR 19002 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18994#discussion_r134145171
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -1214,6 +1246,11 @@ object HiveExternalCatalog {
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19002#discussion_r134144956
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SQLTestUtils.scala ---
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.PlanTest
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18994#discussion_r134144063
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/TableConstraints.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18958
**[Test build #80918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80918/testReport)**
for PR 18958 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80912/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80911/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
**[Test build #80911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80911/testReport)**
for PR 18999 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
**[Test build #80912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80912/testReport)**
for PR 18999 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17951
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80914/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17951
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17951
**[Test build #80914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80914/testReport)**
for PR 17951 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
@cenyuhai
Are you still working on this? Could please fix the test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user janewangfb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
still need to implement the data source table portion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
**[Test build #80917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80917/testReport)**
for PR 18975 at commit
Github user janewangfb closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #80913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80913/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80913/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19002#discussion_r134140695
--- Diff:
external/docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/OracleIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -255,6 +256,18 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19002#discussion_r134140826
--- Diff:
external/docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/OracleIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -255,6 +256,18 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19008
**[Test build #80916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80916/testReport)**
for PR 19008 at commit
Github user liupc closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18985
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18968
**[Test build #80915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80915/testReport)**
for PR 18968 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19009
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17951
**[Test build #80914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80914/testReport)**
for PR 17951 at commit
GitHub user heary-cao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19009
[MINOR][CORE]remove scala 's' function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
remove scala 's' function when output information without taking the value
of the
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18985
@liupc If you have no more question about this, can you close this PR?
Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18985
OK. Thanks @liupc.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user liupc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18985
Sorry, I think SPARK-18675 has solved this problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18675
My environment is hive-0.13, spark2.1.0, There are two reasons caused this
problem.
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Will wait for @brkyvz , @HyukjinKwon for final âï¸
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #80913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80913/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user yssharma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029#discussion_r134138994
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/InitialPosition.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Added review suggestions @budde !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
Btw, as for merged prs, I'm just monitoring TPCDS perf. in
[here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1V8xoKR9ElU-rOXMH84gb5BbLEw0XAPTJY8c8aZeIqus/edit#gid=445143188).
Also, I wrote a script
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18906
@ptkool Thank you for working on this!
I'd like to ask what your use-case is. Users have historically been
confused about what nullable means, and we don't think we should give them yet
another
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
yea, I'll do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18968#discussion_r134136888
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -138,46 +138,80 @@ case class Not(child:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
@maropu Interesting. Would you like to benchmark with #18931 too? It is my
attempt to solve long code-gen functions without disabling it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966#discussion_r134134190
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -582,6 +582,15 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
**[Test build #80912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80912/testReport)**
for PR 18999 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
**[Test build #80911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80911/testReport)**
for PR 18999 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18748
Thanks @MLnick . I have double checked my test.
Since there is no recommendForUserSubset , my previous test is MLLIB
MatrixFactorizationModel::predict(RDD(Int, Int)), which predicts the rating of
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999#discussion_r134131441 looks
hidden. I addressed the other comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18866
@cloud-fan
Would you give some advice on this ? Thus I can know if I'm on the right
direction. I can keep working on it :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999#discussion_r134131441
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -659,19 +659,77 @@ def distinct(self):
return DataFrame(self._jdf.distinct(),
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18576
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
(copied from jira for just-in-case) Just for your information, I checked
the performance changes of TPCDS before/after the pr #18810; the pr affected
Q17/Q66 only (that is, they have too long
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18986
Yea, since this topic is important for some users, I mean we better move
the doc into `./docs/` ( I feel novices dont seem to check the code documents).
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Will update and post another request seen. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19003#discussion_r134129199
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -763,6 +763,47 @@ class VersionsSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849
If `ALTER TABLE` makes the hive compatibility broken, the value of this
flag becomes misleading. Currently, the naming of this flag is pretty general.
I expect this flag could be used for the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19008#discussion_r134128223
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonParsingOptionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -72,6 +72,21 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966#discussion_r134128067
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -582,6 +582,15 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18968#discussion_r134126635
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -138,46 +138,80 @@ case class Not(child:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19008
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80910/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19008
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19008
**[Test build #80910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80910/testReport)**
for PR 19008 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849
If the flag is set to true, then whenever an "alter table" command is
executed, it will follow the "Hive compatible" path, which lets the Hive
metastore decide whether the change is valid or not.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19001
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80908/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19001
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19001
**[Test build #80908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80908/testReport)**
for PR 19001 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999#discussion_r134123916
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -659,19 +659,77 @@ def distinct(self):
return DataFrame(self._jdf.distinct(), self.sql_ctx)
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18281#discussion_r134123840
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/OneVsRest.scala ---
@@ -17,29 +17,34 @@
package
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
cool - this is a bit understated but potentially huge (to me anyway)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999#discussion_r134123764
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -659,19 +659,77 @@ def distinct(self):
return DataFrame(self._jdf.distinct(),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80909/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18999#discussion_r134123358
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -659,19 +659,77 @@ def distinct(self):
return DataFrame(self._jdf.distinct(), self.sql_ctx)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
**[Test build #80909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80909/testReport)**
for PR 18953 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80907/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
**[Test build #80907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80907/testReport)**
for PR 19007 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80906/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
**[Test build #80906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80906/testReport)**
for PR 19007 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19008
**[Test build #80910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80910/testReport)**
for PR 19008 at commit
GitHub user vinodkc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19008
[SPARK-21756][SQL]Add JSON option to allow unquoted control characters
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds allowUnquotedControlChars option in JSON data
Github user vinodkc closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vinodkc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
Ok , I'm closing my PR.
Now a days, Spark JIRA is not showing PR status.That is why I missed your
PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Hi, @cloud-fan . I added `SparkOrcNewRecordReader.java` back to reduce the
patch size.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19007
Ur, I made the PR two days ago already, #18991
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19001
**[Test build #80908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80908/testReport)**
for PR 19001 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
**[Test build #80909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80909/testReport)**
for PR 18953 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19001
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19001#discussion_r134120888
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/BucketizedSparkRecordReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo