Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19110
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19202#discussion_r138408545
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user smurching commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106
@sethah I haven't heard of anybody hitting this issue in practice, but it
did seem best to ensure that valid probability distributions would be produced
regardless of input. There was some
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201#discussion_r138401827
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/QueryPlanConstraints.scala
---
@@ -106,91 +106,48 @@ trait
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201#discussion_r138384197
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/QueryPlanConstraints.scala
---
@@ -106,91 +106,48 @@ trait
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
You commented on my code, not on the idea. My code was hacked together
quickly, it can be cleaned up a lot. Your comments don't disprove that
separating the refactoring of the listener bus hierarchy
Github user bOOm-X commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18253
@vanzin I pushed some comments on your code. I think that trying to keep
the exact same class hierarchy leads to a very complex code, with many
drawbacks.
---
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19141#discussion_r138402807
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala
---
@@ -565,7 +565,6 @@ private[spark] class Client(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19132
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81678/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19132
**[Test build #81678 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81678/testReport)**
for PR 19132 at commit
Github user pgandhi999 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
The error logs for test build #81683 state that method
this(Long,Int,Int,Long,Long,Long,Long,Long,Long)Unit in class
org.apache.spark.status.api.v1.ExecutorStageSummary does not have a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19195
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19195
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81680/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19195
**[Test build #81680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81680/testReport)**
for PR 19195 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19106
**[Test build #81687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81687/testReport)**
for PR 19106 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
Tested with several larger data set with Hinge Loss function, to compare
l-bfgs and owlqn solvers.
Run until converged or exceed maxIter (2000).
dataset | numRecords | numFeatures |
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208
**[Test build #81686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81686/testReport)**
for PR 19208 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201
LGTM except a minor comment.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201#discussion_r138393814
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/QueryPlanConstraints.scala
---
@@ -106,91 +106,48 @@ trait
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208#discussion_r138391134
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/ValidatorParams.scala ---
@@ -150,20 +150,14 @@ private[ml] object ValidatorParams {
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208#discussion_r138393318
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -212,14 +238,12 @@ object CrossValidator extends
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208#discussion_r138389265
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -261,17 +290,40 @@ class CrossValidatorModel private[ml] (
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19205
**[Test build #3918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3918/testReport)**
for PR 19205 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208
cc @jkbradley
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18313
@hhbyyh I apologize to you that your PR is valuable (in the case model list
is very big).
But now your PR is stale and I integrate it into my new PR #19208
Would you mind to take a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81685/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208
**[Test build #81685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81685/testReport)**
for PR 19208 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
@BryanCutler @MLnick I found a bug in this PR: after save estimator (CV or
TVS) and then load again, the "Parallelism" setting will be lost. But I fix
this in #19208 by the way.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208
**[Test build #81685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81685/testReport)**
for PR 19208 at commit
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19208
[SPARK-21087] [ML] CrossValidator, TrainValidationSplit should preserve all
models after fitting: Scala
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. We add a parameter
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19175
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19175
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81676/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19175
**[Test build #81676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81676/testReport)**
for PR 19175 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81677/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
**[Test build #81677 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81677/testReport)**
for PR 15544 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81683/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
**[Test build #81683 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81683/testReport)**
for PR 19207 at commit
Github user goldmedal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875
@HyukjinKwon @viirya
Sorry for updating this PR so late. Please take a look when you are
available. Thanks :)
---
-
To
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875
**[Test build #81684 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81684/testReport)**
for PR 18875 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
**[Test build #81683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81683/testReport)**
for PR 19207 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18592
**[Test build #81682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81682/testReport)**
for PR 18592 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19203
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81675/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19203
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19203
**[Test build #81675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81675/testReport)**
for PR 19203 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81681/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
**[Test build #81681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81681/testReport)**
for PR 19207 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
**[Test build #81681 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81681/testReport)**
for PR 19207 at commit
Github user eyalfa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19181#discussion_r138373142
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ public void free() {
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user pgandhi999 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19207
[SPARK-21809] : Change Stage Page to use datatables to support sorting
columns and searching
Support column sort and search for Stage Server using jQuery DataTable and
REST API. Before this
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19136#discussion_r138366512
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DataSourceV2Strategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18659
(I am sorry, I didn't realise this PR was open already ..)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18704#discussion_r138364852
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/ColumnAccessor.scala
---
@@ -149,4 +153,23 @@ private[columnar] object
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18704#discussion_r138363787
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/WritableColumnVector.java
---
@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ private void
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18704#discussion_r138366156
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/compression/compressionSchemes.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,162 @@ private[columnar]
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18704#discussion_r138365192
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/ColumnAccessor.scala
---
@@ -149,4 +153,23 @@ private[columnar] object
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18704#discussion_r138363222
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/ColumnDictionary.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19134
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19134
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81674/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19134
**[Test build #81674 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81674/testReport)**
for PR 19134 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19195
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19195
Merged to master/2.2, and now that I look again here, realize the last
tests technically didn't pass. As it's a doc change only that passed before, I
can't see it will fail, but iwll keep an eye
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19136#discussion_r138357726
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/upward/StatisticsSupport.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19136#discussion_r138357442
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/downward/CatalystFilterPushDownSupport.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user jmchung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19199
Thanks @HyukjinKwon and @viirya :)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19136#discussion_r138355462
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DataSourceV2Strategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19199
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19199
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19195
**[Test build #81680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81680/testReport)**
for PR 19195 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19206
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19195
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19199
LGTM too
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19181
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18592
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81679/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18592
**[Test build #81679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81679/testReport)**
for PR 18592 at commit
GitHub user Chaos-Ju opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19206
Client and ApplicationMaster resolvePath is inappropriate when use viewfs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When HDFS use viewfs and spark construct Executor's and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18592
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user FavioVazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19190
Thanks to Carlos Munguia, Jared Romero and Christhian Flores :).
@montactuaria @jared275 @chris122flores
---
-
To
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19181
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81672/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19181
**[Test build #81672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81672/testReport)**
for PR 19181 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18592
**[Test build #81679 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81679/testReport)**
for PR 18592 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19203
@srowen, it looks `19091` is missed. The rest of mine is a subset of the
current list.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19199
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19132
Thanks @HyukjinKwon , I will ping Josh about this thing ð .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19132
@jerryshao, for triggering tests on Jenkins, I think this should be added
by its admin manually as well if I understood correctly. In my case, I asked
this to Josh Rosen before via email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81671/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201
**[Test build #81671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81671/testReport)**
for PR 19201 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19132
**[Test build #81678 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81678/testReport)**
for PR 19132 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19132
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19199
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19199
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81673/
Test PASSed.
---
201 - 300 of 465 matches
Mail list logo
