Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r140606013
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/SymmetricHashJoinStateManager.scala
---
@@ -89,61 +89,124 @@ class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r140615574
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -116,6 +116,26 @@ class StreamingJoinSuite extends
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r140608032
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/SymmetricHashJoinStateManager.scala
---
@@ -89,61 +89,124 @@ class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r140614563
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/SymmetricHashJoinStateManager.scala
---
@@ -89,61 +89,124 @@ class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r140614721
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/SymmetricHashJoinStateManager.scala
---
@@ -89,61 +89,124 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82095/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
**[Test build #82095 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82095/testReport)**
for PR 19323 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
cc @HyukjinKwon @viirya
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19311#discussion_r140612177
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStoreSuite.scala ---
@@ -407,4 +407,119 @@ class MemoryStoreSuite
})
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
> @mallman how about adding comment explaining why such workaround was done
+ bug number in parquet-mr ? So in future once that bug is fixed, code can be
cleaned.
It will take me more time
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19194
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82092/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19194
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19194
**[Test build #82092 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82092/testReport)**
for PR 19194 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
**[Test build #82097 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82097/testReport)**
for PR 16578 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19302
I am opening a new jira SPARK-22088 for this. I will close this PR. The
style fails is because a new JIRA SPARK-22088 fixed a style issue after I
submit my PR. I have included that JIRA in my new
Github user kevinyu98 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19302
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578#discussion_r140611282
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaPruning.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
**[Test build #82094 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82094/testReport)**
for PR 19327 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82094/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
**[Test build #82096 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82096/testReport)**
for PR 19325 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19311
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19311
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82091/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19311
**[Test build #82091 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82091/testReport)**
for PR 19311 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82093/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
**[Test build #82093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82093/testReport)**
for PR 19325 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19122#discussion_r140600118
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -836,6 +836,27 @@ def test_save_load_simple_estimator(self):
loadedModel =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
**[Test build #82095 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82095/testReport)**
for PR 19323 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
**[Test build #82094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82094/testReport)**
for PR 19327 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19326
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user joseph-torres opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
[WIP] Implement stream-stream outer joins.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow one-sided outer joins between two streams when a watermark is defined.
GitHub user jgoleary opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19326
[SPARK-22107] Change as to alias in python quickstart
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updated docs so that a line of python in the quick start guide executes.
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
Adding the patch to enable 0-parameter pandas_udf if it is requested in the
future
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
**[Test build #82093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82093/testReport)**
for PR 19325 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
This is a followup to #18659
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
@cloud-fan @ueshin I'm not sure if you are ok with merging this soon, but
in adding the doctests I found there were problems with using the decorator and
having empty partitions. I fixed those
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19325
[SPARK--22106][PYSPARK][SQL] Disable 0-parameter pandas_udf and add doctests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change disables the use of 0-parameter pandas_udfs
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19194
**[Test build #82092 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82092/testReport)**
for PR 19194 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19194
Jenkins, test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19311
**[Test build #82091 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82091/testReport)**
for PR 19311 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19303
Personally I don't suggest we add extra logic to resolve a non-bug.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19317
cc @WeichenXu123 mind take a look?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19270
I just tried this out and it appears to be working for me for a running
application, haven't tried the history UI yet.@ajbozarth What browser are
you using and what are you running (a
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19311#discussion_r140559549
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -544,20 +544,39 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
}
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18994
Thank you for the input @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18659#discussion_r14089
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -199,6 +211,55 @@ def __repr__(self):
return "ArrowSerializer"
+class
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
Thanks for looking into this @srowen. Its weird, I dont understand that
either. Also, I am not able to reproduce this issue on my laptop.
---
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17743
People don't realise how much object stores aren't file systems until they
discover all their assumptions are broken.
Once you know how they work, you can set up a workflow which is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19300
or find and fix more typos ;)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13143
@ArtRand I think this is still an issue which needs to be merged, do you
have any observations with this PR?
---
-
To
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18659
Thanks @cloud-fan @ueshin and others who reviewed! I'll make followups to
disable 0-param and complete the docs for this.
---
Github user juliuszsompolski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19324
@viirya This is related to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931/, as
it also separates out the consume function. Maybe it would be enough to do
similar splits into functions in the
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19229
The performance gap issue (compared with RDD version), I create a separated
JIRA to track:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22105
As the result of discussion with @cloud-fan
Github user juliuszsompolski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19324#discussion_r140532783
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -462,18 +464,36 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19194
**[Test build #82090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82090/testReport)**
for PR 19194 at commit
Github user juliuszsompolski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19324#discussion_r140528883
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -329,6 +332,15 @@ case class
Github user juliuszsompolski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19324#discussion_r140528662
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -599,10 +621,14 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82080/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
**[Test build #82080 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82080/testReport)**
for PR 19222 at commit
Github user juliuszsompolski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19324
@hvanhovell @gatorsmile @cloud-fan @rednaxelafx
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19324
**[Test build #82088 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82088/testReport)**
for PR 19324 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
**[Test build #82089 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82089/testReport)**
for PR 19222 at commit
GitHub user juliuszsompolski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19324
[SPARK-22103] Move HashAggregateExec parent consume to a separate function
in codegen
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
HashAggregateExec codegen uses two paths
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19322
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19322
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82082/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19322
**[Test build #82082 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82082/testReport)**
for PR 19322 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19156
@cloud-fan Can you help review the part of code which related to SQL
interface ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19277
**[Test build #3932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3932/testReport)**
for PR 19277 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82078/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
**[Test build #82078 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82078/testReport)**
for PR 19222 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19290
Will update the comment tomorrow.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
**[Test build #82087 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82087/testReport)**
for PR 19222 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
**[Test build #82085 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82085/testReport)**
for PR 19323 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19020
**[Test build #82086 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82086/testReport)**
for PR 19020 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19020
Jenkins, test this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user ala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
@hvanhovell
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user ala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19323
[SPARK-22092] Reallocation in OffHeapColumnVector.reserveInternal corrupts
struct and array data
`OffHeapColumnVector.reserveInternal()` will only copy already inserted
values during reallocation if
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Ok, I missed that you had moved these into the base class. I still look
forward to the benchmark :)...
I still think that the hierarchy does give any benefit. All block
subclasses
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19301#discussion_r140508154
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -72,11 +74,19 @@ object
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
As @hvanhovell pointed out, the first implementation introduced a lot
polymorphic call sites in very performance critical code (e.g.
`getBaseObject()` or `getBaseOffset()`. While `MemoryBlock` class
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19322#discussion_r140503940
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveCliSessionStateSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,12 +28,12 @@ import
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19144
Thank you, I was wrong. I've seen it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19301
@stanzhai Thanks. I see. Because the aggregation functions are bound to
individual buffer slots, they are recognized as different expressions and won't
be eliminated.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19144
That's right, please look at
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/AllBatchesTable.scala#L28
BTW, sometimes there's another
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19319
Thanks @HyukjinKwon
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19144
Because you didn't fetch the upstream I guess ..
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19285
**[Test build #82084 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82084/testReport)**
for PR 19285 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19322
cc @cloud-fan @yaooqinn
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Circling back to the inheritance discussion. My worry is that this will
introduce a lot polymorphic call sites in very performance critical code. Even
if you tag on final to each method, the
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
Hm, this might be a real error. It seems to be hanging at:
```
[info] ExternalAppendOnlyMapSuite:
...
[info] - simple cogroup (56 milliseconds)
[info] - spilling (3 seconds,
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19144
https://github.com/guoxiaolongzte/spark/blob/master/streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/AllBatchesTable.scala
It's strange that I didn't see my revised record.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19144
This is merged to master ...
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/10e37f6eb6819c9233830c0d97e8fd1c713be0f1
...
---
-
To
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19144
why is it closed?I think this should be incorporated into the master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
101 - 200 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
