Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18760
yea it will be great to see how SPARK-18838 works in real env!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19389
**[Test build #82307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82307/testReport)**
for PR 19389 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19389
cc @cloud-fan (I believe my similar PR was reviewed by you before), @ueshin
and @squito.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19389
[SPARK-22165][SQL] Resolve type conflicts between decimals, dates and
timestamps in partition column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to re-use
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19290
Oh! but if we upgrade it first, many builds in PRs should be broken due to
this check failure. Probably, let me revert the script first to not upgrade it
in order to unblock this.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19290
Let me revert "... || packageVersion("lintr") != "1.0.1.9000" this
condition back so that it does not try to upgrade it.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19290
hmm, perhaps open a ticket to ask shane to update Jenkins to this commit
checksum manually?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19287
@squito Hi Rashid, thanks for you review and advise. In the last commit I
moved `killedByOtherAttempt` into `TaskSetManager ` as you say and added more
asserts in UT.
---
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18760
@vanzin Hi Vanzin, thanks a lot for your comments.
Firstly answer your question about `Why isn't hold mode just calling
queue.put (blocking) instead of queue.offer (non-blocking)?`
In
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
**[Test build #82304 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82304/testReport)**
for PR 19388 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82304/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19287
**[Test build #82306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82306/testReport)**
for PR 19287 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387#discussion_r141786663
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Partitioner.scala ---
@@ -108,11 +108,21 @@ class HashPartitioner(partitions: Int) extends
Partitioner {
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
Merging in master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user liutang123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19364#discussion_r141785140
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ class ExchangeCoordinator(
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19287#discussion_r141784872
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -66,6 +66,13 @@ class TaskInfo(
*/
var finishTime: Long =
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19287#discussion_r141784812
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManagerSuite.scala ---
@@ -744,6 +744,100 @@ class TaskSetManagerSuite extends
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19330
@jinxing64 I would like to hear opinions from other reviewers whether
`ordered` should be included in these methods like `ToString`,
`buildFormattedString`, and `jsonValue`.
IMO, I think we
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19287#discussion_r141784747
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManagerSuite.scala ---
@@ -744,6 +744,100 @@ class TaskSetManagerSuite extends
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19364#discussion_r141784391
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ class ExchangeCoordinator(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82305/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
**[Test build #3938 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3938/testReport)**
for PR 18805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
**[Test build #82305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82305/testReport)**
for PR 19327 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82303/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82302/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
**[Test build #82302 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82302/testReport)**
for PR 19387 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
**[Test build #82303 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82303/testReport)**
for PR 19344 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19364#discussion_r141781986
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ class ExchangeCoordinator(
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19330
@kiszk
Thanks a lot for comments. Tests passed now. In current change `ordered` is
included in `jsonValue`. But I'm not sure it is appropriate.
Thanks again for taking time looking
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r141780866
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2206,6 +2207,10 @@ def pandas_udf(f=None, returnType=StringType()):
| 8| JOHN DOE|
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82301/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
**[Test build #82301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82301/testReport)**
for PR 19344 at commit
Github user liutang123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19364#discussion_r141780697
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ class ExchangeCoordinator(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19380
We also have `FromUnixTime` and seems the data type of unix time is defined
as `LongType` across those unix time expressions. We shouldn't change just one
expression so there is inconsistency.
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19380
Since the RDMS keep the milliseconds, we should follow it. This proposal
LGTM. @gatorsmile CC
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19380#discussion_r141777351
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -620,7 +621,7 @@ abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82295/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
**[Test build #82295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82295/testReport)**
for PR 19387 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82296/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19360
I was trying to find out more not used
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
**[Test build #82296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82296/testReport)**
for PR 19387 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388#discussion_r141775799
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -524,6 +525,13 @@ class PairRDDFunctionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388#discussion_r141774733
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -864,6 +872,47 @@ class NewFakeFormatWithCallback() extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388#discussion_r141774796
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -864,6 +872,47 @@ class NewFakeFormatWithCallback() extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388#discussion_r141774743
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -864,6 +872,47 @@ class NewFakeFormatWithCallback() extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387#discussion_r141776977
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Partitioner.scala ---
@@ -108,11 +108,21 @@ class HashPartitioner(partitions: Int) extends
Partitioner {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r141775540
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2129,7 +2129,8 @@ def _create_udf(f, returnType, vectorized):
def _udf(f,
Github user rezasafi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15769#discussion_r141774719
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/SparkHadoopMapReduceWriter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user httfighter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19380
In RDMS , unix_timestamp method can keep the milliseconds. For example,
execute the command as follows
select unix_timestamp("2017-10-10 10:10:20.111") from test;
you can get the
Github user yaooqinn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19363
cc again @cloud-fan @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19384
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19384
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82297/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19384
**[Test build #82297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82297/testReport)**
for PR 19384 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19360
Shall we close this one for now then?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82298/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
**[Test build #82298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82298/testReport)**
for PR 19386 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19364#discussion_r141772352
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ class ExchangeCoordinator(
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19364#discussion_r141772266
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/ExchangeCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ class ExchangeCoordinator(
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19364
please add `[SQL]` in the title like "[SPARK-22144][SQL]..."
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19318
@VinceShieh can you please mark this PR's title as "[WIP]"?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19360
Okay, I accept your opinion
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19294
Adding folks who have context about spark sql's `FileFormatWriter`
@ericchiang @rxin @cloud-fan @steveloughran @jiangxb1987
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19360
We could find like you did now. Otherwise, we could suggest to fix these
instances in another PR from other guys fixing them. I personally don't support
to open each PR for these if it is not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82292/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
**[Test build #82292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82292/testReport)**
for PR 19386 at commit
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19360
How do you find other similar mistakes?
Of course, found a immediately resolved, or behind the code more and more
chaos
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82291/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
**[Test build #82291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82291/testReport)**
for PR 19386 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
I believe I should cc @cloud-fan too BTW. Will take a closer look too soon.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
**[Test build #82304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82304/testReport)**
for PR 19388 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
**[Test build #82305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82305/testReport)**
for PR 19327 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
**[Test build #82303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82303/testReport)**
for PR 19344 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r141765717
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -3376,6 +3377,74 @@ def test_vectorized_udf_empty_partition(self):
res =
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r141765529
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2206,6 +2207,10 @@ def pandas_udf(f=None, returnType=StringType()):
| 8| JOHN
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r141765893
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ArrowEvalPythonExec.scala
---
@@ -44,14 +44,17 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82294/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19386
**[Test build #82294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82294/testReport)**
for PR 19386 at commit
Github user xuanwang14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
I put up a comment saying this test result should be deterministic, since
the sampling uses a fixed seed based on partition id.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19384
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82289/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387
**[Test build #82302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82302/testReport)**
for PR 19387 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19384
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19384
**[Test build #82289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82289/testReport)**
for PR 19384 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
Moving it to Python script sounds a good idea to me if possible in the
future.I did have the smae concern with @felixcheung but to me okay to add it
after reading the comment above.
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
@gatorsmile ok, fixed. Also, I checked this code could collect all the
relations.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
**[Test build #82301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82301/testReport)**
for PR 19344 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387#discussion_r141764431
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ConfigBehaviorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19387#discussion_r141764415
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ConfigBehaviorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
