Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19470
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82620/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19470
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19470
**[Test build #82620 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82620/testReport)**
for PR 19470 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82625/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #82625 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82625/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82621/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
**[Test build #82621 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82621/testReport)**
for PR 19469 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
@hvanhovell @tejasapatil Could you please review this PR since I rebased
with master and resolved conflicts?
---
-
To
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468#discussion_r143916064
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2649,6 +2649,13 @@
+ kubernetes
--- End diff --
this new profile is not use in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #82625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82625/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82624/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #82624 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82624/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
@vanzin @srowen @mridulm @mgummelt
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #82624 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82624/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82617/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
**[Test build #82617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82617/testReport)**
for PR 19222 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #82623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82623/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82623/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #82623 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82623/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
**[Test build #82622 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82622/testReport)**
for PR 18931 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19316
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19316
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82616/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19316
**[Test build #82616 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82616/testReport)**
for PR 19316 at commit
Github user adrian-ionescu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
To me, this looks good.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82618/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
**[Test build #82618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82618/testReport)**
for PR 18931 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
There's a similar PR #19427 , I was wondering if we can provide a general
solution for such issues, like using a configuration to specify all the confs
which needs to be reloaded,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
**[Test build #82621 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82621/testReport)**
for PR 19469 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
LGTM. cc @jerryshao to take a look.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
I'm not sure if to reuse the images from Wikimedia Commons is completely
safe.
Quoted from
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Reusing_content_outside_Wikimedia:
* Content
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460#discussion_r143908510
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +101,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143908055
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143907752
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19470
**[Test build #82620 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82620/testReport)**
for PR 19470 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19470
[SPARK-18355][SQL] Use Spark schema to read ORC table instead of ORC file
schema
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before Hive 2.0, ORC File schema has invalid
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143906892
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82615/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
**[Test build #82615 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82615/testReport)**
for PR 19082 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460#discussion_r143906721
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +101,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user sridharsubramanian62 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6751
Let me know if this does not help
[SPARK-16475] Broadcast Hint for SQL Queries - ASF JIRA
|
|
| |
[SPARK-16475] Broadcast Hint for SQL Queries - ASF
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82614/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460#discussion_r143906288
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +101,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
**[Test build #82614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82614/testReport)**
for PR 19468 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143906167
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460#discussion_r143906011
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -100,6 +101,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user ChenjunZou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
[SPARK-22243][DStreams]spark.yarn.jars reload from config when Checkpoint
recovery
add spark.yarn.jars to the checkpoint reload configs.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143905322
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/HadoopUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19363
**[Test build #82619 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82619/testReport)**
for PR 19363 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143904983
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/HadoopUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143904721
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user yaooqinn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19363#discussion_r143904084
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyValueGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -564,4 +565,30 @@ class KeyValueGroupedDataset[K, V]
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082#discussion_r143903396
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +246,89 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18931
**[Test build #82618 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82618/testReport)**
for PR 18931 at commit
Github user ConeyLiu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19316#discussion_r143901552
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -388,7 +388,13 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
//
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143899168
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82610/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
**[Test build #82610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82610/testReport)**
for PR 19250 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82608/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19222
**[Test build #82617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82617/testReport)**
for PR 19222 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
**[Test build #82608 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82608/testReport)**
for PR 18805 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082#discussion_r143897243
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +246,89 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082#discussion_r143897031
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +246,89 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
@kiszk @gatorsmile @rednaxelafx Based on the following reasoning, I don't
think the cutting of whole-stage operators you may propose would be much
beneficial than the approach did in #18931:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19269
yea it's not a substitute for passing commit messages to job abort, I
already updated this PR to do it.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19316
**[Test build #82616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82616/testReport)**
for PR 19316 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19316#discussion_r143896120
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -388,7 +388,13 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
//
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19316
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448#discussion_r143894782
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetCommitterSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448#discussion_r143894675
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetCommitterSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448#discussion_r143894921
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetCommitterSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082#discussion_r143895917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +246,89 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19467
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82609/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19467
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19467
**[Test build #82609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82609/testReport)**
for PR 19467 at commit
Github user dakirsa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143894388
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/image.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user dakirsa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439#discussion_r143894101
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19466
Would you please show us an example of how it breaks? The codes here which
assigning all resources to local ones might work, but it covers which line is
really broken, can you please describe
Github user fjh100456 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6751
Is there an example?
I use broadcast like the following, but it perform an error.Would you be so
kind as to show me an example?
>spark-sql> select a.* from tableA a left outer join
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19082
**[Test build #82615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82615/testReport)**
for PR 19082 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19466
Also please add tests, otherwise this will be broken again.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19466#discussion_r143890640
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -366,6 +366,16 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils with
Logging {
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19316
Hi @cloud-fan @jiangxb1987 Do you have time to check this? Thanks a lot.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82606/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19424
@rdblue we assume the previous batches should push down operators as close
to data source relations as possible. One special case is column pruning. The
`ColumnPruning` rule tries to generate a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
1 - 100 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
