Github user daroo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
It seems that your "magic spell" didn't work. No build was triggered
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19747#discussion_r152734937
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -895,6 +898,19 @@ private[hive] object HiveClientImpl {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19747#discussion_r152734026
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -174,6 +174,87 @@ class HiveCatalogedDDLSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19747#discussion_r152734005
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -174,6 +174,87 @@ class HiveCatalogedDDLSuite extends
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19518
I'd prefer inner class approach.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
@yucai would you mind adding more explanations to your PR description?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18692#discussion_r152725251
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -152,3 +152,71 @@ object EliminateOuterJoin extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84124/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797
**[Test build #84124 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84124/testReport)**
for PR 19797 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
Seems there is a conflict while backporting to branch-2.2. @jsnowacki, mind
opening a backporting PR to branch-2.2 please?
I think this is important for many Windows users and I guess
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797#discussion_r152719853
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -799,9 +799,11 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797#discussion_r152719657
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -87,35 +87,41 @@ private [sql] object
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797#discussion_r152719475
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -799,9 +799,11 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797#discussion_r152719412
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -799,9 +799,11 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19757
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84123/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19757
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19757
**[Test build #84123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84123/testReport)**
for PR 19757 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19621#discussion_r152717925
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -130,21 +160,49 @@ class StringIndexer @Since("1.4.0") (
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19621#discussion_r152717985
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexer.scala ---
@@ -130,21 +160,49 @@ class StringIndexer @Since("1.4.0") (
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19518
@bdrillard @cloud-fan @maropu
I created and run a benchmark program. I think that to use an array for a
compaction is slower than to use scalar instance variables. In the following my
case, 20%
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19746
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84122/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19746
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19746
**[Test build #84122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84122/testReport)**
for PR 19746 at commit
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
I can't reproduce the issue after #19767 is merged. Hopefully it solves
this issue too, so I will close this. If not and I can reproduce it later, I
will re-open this.
---
Github user vinodkc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19795
Thank you
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user vinodkc closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19795
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19756
My first thought is also to fix `Exchange.sameResult`. But I realize soon
that it is not a right fix. The reason is, the results of coordinated exchanges
are dependent with all exchanges coordinated
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84121/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
**[Test build #84121 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84121/testReport)**
for PR 19717 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19621
@MLnick Ah, I don't express it exactly, the first case, what I mean is,
sort by frequency, but if the case frequency equal, sort by alphabet.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797
**[Test build #84124 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84124/testReport)**
for PR 19797 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19792
@gberger, BTW, just to be clear, IIRC the type inference and merging code
path here are shared for other data types, for example, dict, namedtuple, row
and etc.
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797#discussion_r152712011
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -851,9 +855,11 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19757
**[Test build #84123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84123/testReport)**
for PR 19757 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19792
Thanks @ueshin. Yup, +1 for adding some tests.
I just wonder if we could have a similar form of error message in type
verification. I remember I fixed a similar issue for type
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
Build started: [SparkR] `ALL`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19798
**[Test build #3990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3990/testReport)**
for PR 19798 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19798
**[Test build #3990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3990/testReport)**
for PR 19798 at commit
Github user ArtRand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19798
@kalvinnchau thanks for catching this mistake. @vanzin can we get a quick
merge?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84119/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
Merging with master
This is awesome to get in---thanks a lot @imatiach-msft and everyone who
contributed and reviewed!!
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
**[Test build #84119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84119/testReport)**
for PR 19370 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763#discussion_r152702214
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -472,15 +475,66 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTrackerMaster(
Github user MrBago commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19588#discussion_r152701758
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/VectorIndexer.scala ---
@@ -311,22 +342,39 @@ class VectorIndexerModel private[ml] (
//
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763
> We can shut down the pool after some certain idle time, but not sure if
it's worth the complexity
Yeah, that's just what the cached thread pool does :)
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763
OK to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19651#discussion_r152699261
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcDeserializer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19651#discussion_r152699116
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcDeserializer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763#discussion_r152693924
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -472,15 +475,66 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTrackerMaster(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763#discussion_r152693851
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -472,15 +475,66 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTrackerMaster(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19746
**[Test build #84122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84122/testReport)**
for PR 19746 at commit
Github user MrBago commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19746
jenkins retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84118/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
**[Test build #84118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84118/testReport)**
for PR 19439 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
**[Test build #84121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84121/testReport)**
for PR 19717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84117/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
**[Test build #84117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84117/testReport)**
for PR 19439 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84120/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
**[Test build #84120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84120/testReport)**
for PR 19717 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19717
**[Test build #84120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84120/testReport)**
for PR 19717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84116/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
**[Test build #84116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84116/testReport)**
for PR 19468 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84114/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
**[Test build #84114 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84114/testReport)**
for PR 19468 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
ok to test
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Daroo wrote:
> Cool. Could you please authorize it for testing?
>
> â
> You are receiving this
Github user daroo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
Cool. Could you please authorize it for testing?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
**[Test build #84119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84119/testReport)**
for PR 19370 at commit
Github user jsnowacki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
Thanks for looking into it again. I've followed your suggestions and
updated PR. It also seems to work for me now.
---
-
To
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
Seems reasonable.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Daroo wrote:
> It fails on the current master branch and doesn't after the patch
>
> â
Github user ArtRand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19390
Just to reiterate our conversation here.
The `AllocationInfo` tells the scheduler which `role`âs allocation of
resources the `Offer` is coming from, whereas the `ReservationInfo` tells
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797#discussion_r152664308
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -851,9 +855,11 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user daroo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
It fails on the current master branch and doesn't after the patch
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
What are you actually asserting in that test and/or does it reliably fail
if run on the version of your code before the patch?
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Daroo
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
Thanks! LGTM pending tests
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user aokolnychyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18692#discussion_r152660385
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -152,3 +152,71 @@ object EliminateOuterJoin extends
Github user daroo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19789
I've added a test. @koeninger is it something you had in mind?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19468
@reviewers, just as a PSA we have to rebase the second PR (containing the
submission client) _after_ this one merges, and then we can submit the second
one against this upstream. This is a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
**[Test build #84118 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84118/testReport)**
for PR 19439 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
@jkbradley good catch - I added the missing link to the license file and I
rebased the code against the very very latest master. Thanks!
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
**[Test build #84117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84117/testReport)**
for PR 19439 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
good catch, it's from here:
https://ccsearch.creativecommons.org/image/detail/B2CVP_j5KjwZm7UAVJ3Hvw==
let me add it to the list
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607#discussion_r152646370
--- Diff: python/setup.py ---
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ def _supports_symlinks():
extras_require={
'ml': ['numpy>=1.7'],
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607#discussion_r152645369
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -997,6 +997,14 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19798
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user kalvinnchau opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19798
[SPARK-22583] First delegation token renewal time is not 75% of renewal
time in Mesos
The first scheduled renewal time is is set to the exact expiration time,
and all subsequent renewal
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19752#discussion_r152643842
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -211,111 +231,61 @@ abstract class
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19439
I just noticed: Where is data/mllib/images/kittens/DP153539.jpg from?
(It's missing in the license list.)
---
-
To
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19797
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84115/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo