Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
@chetkhatri not sure what you mean. The whole change here is considered,
and doesn't pass style checks. Look at the test results and fix the errors.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85199/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19715
**[Test build #85199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85199/testReport)**
for PR 19715 at commit
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
@srowen why only recent commit is going to merge, can't we get "squash
merge" ?
Please re-run test build. and let me know if still seems wrong.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85194/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85194/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user sujithjay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
@tgravescs Thank you for keeping me informed. I look forward to receiving
your review. Happy holidays!
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037#discussion_r158097751
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ private[spark] object SparkSubmitUtils {
//
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
@sujithjay thanks for working on this. I will review but I'm not sure I
will get to it for a bit, I'm out for the holidays and not sure I can give this
the time it needs for a full review today.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
**[Test build #85200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85200/testReport)**
for PR 20002 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
**[Test build #4018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4018/testReport)**
for PR 20016 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
**[Test build #4018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4018/testReport)**
for PR 20016 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037#discussion_r158090484
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ private[spark] object SparkSubmitUtils {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037#discussion_r158089460
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ private[spark] object SparkSubmitUtils {
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
Thanks for doing the update @shaneknapp and thanks for looking into the
details @HyukjinKwon !
I'll look into the test issues with python2.7, it looks to be related to
timestamps..
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19983
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19983
merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
@HyukjinKwon @mgaido91 @srowen All the changes are addressed and committed,
please do review and needful.
---
-
To
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037
@srowen I think we are resolving a different issue. Your PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17416 is trying to resolve the issues
raised by `spark-submit et al via --packages`, in which
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19983
lgtm
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19715
**[Test build #85199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85199/testReport)**
for PR 19715 at commit
Github user huaxingao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19715
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85193/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
**[Test build #85193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85193/testReport)**
for PR 20020 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19929
kindly ping @cloud-fan @gatorsmile @HyukjinKwon @zero323
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85198/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035#discussion_r158082275
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -214,11 +213,12 @@ case class Stack(children:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037
**[Test build #85197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85197/testReport)**
for PR 20037 at commit
Github user bdrillard commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20010#discussion_r158081192
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -158,11 +169,6 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85191/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85191 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85191/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037
[SPARK-22849] ivy.retrieve pattern should also consider `classifier`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the previous PR
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158074477
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/submit/steps/DriverInitContainerBootstrapStep.scala
---
@@ -0,0
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
I need to go sleep now and I guess @ueshin should be sleeping too. Let me
leave my signoff here - LGTM if the tests pass. I guess now other builds in
other PRs would be broken without this PR.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035#discussion_r158071129
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -214,11 +213,12 @@ case class Stack(children:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20036
**[Test build #85196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85196/testReport)**
for PR 20036 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Well, I proposed to check it only for tests at the beginning, but I don't
have a strong preference now as the new approach I took can guarantee that no
place would violate it, by looking at all
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85189/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20036
[SPARK-18016][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Code Generation: Constant Pool Limit - reduce
entries for mutable state
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR addresses additional review
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85189/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85188/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
**[Test build #85188 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85188/testReport)**
for PR 20030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85190/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
**[Test build #85190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85190/testReport)**
for PR 20019 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85195/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20033
**[Test build #4017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4017/testReport)**
for PR 20033 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Honestly, I liked very much doing the test only for testing and not
throwing an exception in production. IMHO it is an overkill to throw an
exception in production and in the remote case that we
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032#discussion_r158064721
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -217,7
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
This is a lot of code for what sounds like a small win; what is the
performance gain? you can already do this with windowing right?
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85194/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r158060614
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/regexpExpressions.scala
---
@@ -112,15 +112,15 @@ case class Like(left:
Github user squito closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19975
Thank you so much, @zsxwing and @brkyvz
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
This PR comes from [this
discussion](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19811#discussion_r157408061).
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19035#discussion_r158047414
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -435,6 +435,18 @@ case class
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19035#discussion_r158050733
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -435,6 +435,18 @@ case class
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17425
@gatorsmile I have the same question. Which operation in Generator is bad?
All of them, or only one?
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85187/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85187/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
**[Test build #85193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85193/testReport)**
for PR 20020 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85186/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85186/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
**[Test build #85192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/testReport)**
for PR 20002 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
**[Test build #85192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85192/testReport)**
for PR 20002 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
Jenkins, test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85182/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85182 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85182/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85191/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
alright https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18754 should now be unblocked.
let me know if there's anything else that needs to happen.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85189 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85189/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
**[Test build #85190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85190/testReport)**
for PR 20019 at commit
Github user gaborgsomogyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
@smurakozi nice catch, added them. Additionally found a nit.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
we should be good to go:
```$ pssh -h jenkins_workers.txt -t 0 "export
PATH=/home/anaconda/envs/py3k/bin$PATH; pip install pyarrow==0.8.0"
[1] 05:55:00 [SUCCESS]
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035#discussion_r158029035
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -214,11 +214,15 @@ case class Stack(children:
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Enable to execute generated code of function in Generator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables to execute generated code of `Explode`, PosExplode`,
`Inline`,
Github user superbobry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19992#discussion_r158028287
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocol.scala ---
@@ -444,12 +444,15 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocol {
("Disk
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
@HyukjinKwon @wesm @BryanCutler
alright. here's my plan for right now:
* python 3.4.5 -- upgrade pyarrow --> 0.8.0 (confirmed working on my
staging environment)
what i'm
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
since now we let inserting commands have a child, it makes sense to wrap
the child with `AnalysisBarrier`, to avoid re-analyzing them. also cc @viirya
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85179/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85179/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020#discussion_r158025766
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DataWritingCommand.scala
---
@@ -20,30 +20,18 @@ package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85178/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85178/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
**[Test build #85188 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85188/testReport)**
for PR 20030 at commit
401 - 500 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
