Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
**[Test build #85169 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85169/testReport)**
for PR 19096 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19218
**[Test build #85173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85173/testReport)**
for PR 19218 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
**[Test build #85174 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85174/testReport)**
for PR 19096 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
**[Test build #85172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85172/testReport)**
for PR 20030 at commit
Github user mrkm4ntr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19988
> When gradient nearly zero, and line-search failed. I think this is also
possible. This should get valid model.
Yes, I agree.
> When gradient non-zero, line-search failed, will
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
[SPARK-10496][CORE] Efficient RDD cumulative sum
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
impl Efficient RDD cumulative sum
## How was this patch tested?
existing
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #85171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85171/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
**[Test build #85170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85170/testReport)**
for PR 19096 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
**[Test build #85169 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85169/testReport)**
for PR 19096 at commit
Github user chetkhatri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r157973588
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -104,6 +103,60 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
@cloud-fan @dongjoon-hyun @gatorsmile @rxin @viirya I saw you worked on
this files. Maybe you can help reviewing the PR. For further details about the
reasons of this PR, please refer to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85168/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #85168 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85168/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85167 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85167/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #85168 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85168/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r157967544
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,498 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Running Spark on Kubernetes
+---
+* This will
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20010#discussion_r157967667
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -158,11 +169,6 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user opsnull commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12518
@rxin HIï¼do you have any plan on CEP ï¼
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20026#discussion_r157966811
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStore.scala ---
@@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ private class EncryptedBlockData(
conf:
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r157966640
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,502 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Running Spark on Kubernetes
+---
+* This will
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85166/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r157965524
--- Diff: docs/building-spark.md ---
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ To create a Spark distribution like those distributed by
the
to be runnable, use
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20027
Hey @Maple-Wang, could you close this and file an issue via JIRA please
(see http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html)?
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021#discussion_r157963775
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -930,6 +930,18 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19904#discussion_r157957676
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.tuning
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85165 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85165/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021#discussion_r157962547
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -930,6 +930,18 @@ class CodegenContext
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
> We are supporting pyarrow on Python 2.7 except for Windows
Hi @wesm, mind if I ask the details about Windows? I think we should add
few asserts in the version checks separately later
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r157961467
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/udf.py ---
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ def _wrap_function(sc, func, returnType):
def _create_udf(f, returnType,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
**[Test build #85164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85164/testReport)**
for PR 20021 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r157960643
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/udf.py ---
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ def _wrap_function(sc, func, returnType):
def _create_udf(f, returnType,
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Jenkins, retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20006
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19804
**[Test build #85163 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85163/testReport)**
for PR 19804 at commit
GitHub user wangyum reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19804
[WIP][SPARK-22573][SQL] Shouldn't inferFilters if it contains
SubqueryExpression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Shouldn't inferFilters if it contains
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r157958862
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/udf.py ---
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ def _wrap_function(sc, func, returnType):
def _create_udf(f, returnType,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
**[Test build #85161 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85161/testReport)**
for PR 20020 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20029
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85162 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85162/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
I think we should test PyArrow and Pandas with PyPy and Python 2.x too ...
why not?
@shaneknapp, how about upgrading the current PyArrow (python 3.4.5: pyarrow
0.4.1 -> python 3.4.5:
GitHub user zuotingbing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20029
[SPARK-22793][SQL]Memory leak in Spark Thrift Server
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Start HiveThriftServer2.
2. Connect to thriftserver through beeline.
3.
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85160 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85160/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
retest this, please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85158 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85158/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85156 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85156/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85156/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85157/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85158/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85159/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
**[Test build #85159 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85159/testReport)**
for PR 20020 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85157 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85157/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r157957465
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ArrowPythonRunner.scala
---
@@ -126,18 +121,14 @@ class ArrowPythonRunner(
601 - 659 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
