Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85392/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
**[Test build #85392 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85392/testReport)**
for PR 20081 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged to master. Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
FYI, there is a JIRA for a doc about `spark.sql.parquet.writeLegacyFormat `
- https://issues-test.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/SPARK-20937
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
Which one is more common? A chain of arithmetic expressions? Or a deeply
nested expression? I don't see strong evidence that supports statement output
from the discussion. The only one possibility
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158675633
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/main/dockerfiles/init-container/Dockerfile
---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
> spark.sql.parquet.writeLegacyFormat - if you don't use this
configuration, hive external table won't be able to access parquet data.
Well, that's really an undocumented feature... Can
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
All these insertion commands are from `postHocResolutionRules`, while there
are other batches after it. Skipping the batches after
`postHocResolutionRules` will cause analysis error.
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
**[Test build #85396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85396/testReport)**
for PR 20020 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
cc @srowen
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19929
Could you change the JIRA number to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22901 ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
**[Test build #85395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85395/testReport)**
for PR 20076 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85394/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
**[Test build #85394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85394/testReport)**
for PR 20076 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
**[Test build #85394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85394/testReport)**
for PR 20076 at commit
Github user ep1804 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20004
Revision followed:
- comment on the default values.
- applying charToEscapeQuoteEscaping using Option type.
---
-
To
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20004
**[Test build #85393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85393/testReport)**
for PR 20004 at commit
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11994
if I understand correctly, the only issue here is that we exposed
codehale's MetricsRegistry in Sink base
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85390/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
**[Test build #85390 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85390/testReport)**
for PR 20080 at commit
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
@cloud-fan spark.sql.files.maxRecordsPerFile didn't worked out when i was
working with mine 30 TB of Spark Hive workload whereas repartition and coalesce
made sense.
---
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
@cloud-fan Thanks for PR
4. spark.sql.parquet.writeLegacyFormat - if you don't use this
configuration, hive external table won't be able to access parquet data.
5. repartition and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
I think all arithmetic, predicate and bitwise expressions can benefit from
it, and they are very common expressions in SQL. More importantly, allowing
expressions to output statement may have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
**[Test build #85392 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85392/testReport)**
for PR 20081 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
@chetkhatri @srowen @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20081
[SPARK-22833][EXAMPLE] Improvement SparkHive Scala Examples
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Some improvements:
1. Point out we are using both Spark SQ native syntax
Github user fjh100456 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
Well, I'll revert back the renaming. Any comments? @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85388/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
**[Test build #85388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85388/testReport)**
for PR 20076 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
Sure, let's revert back the rename then.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85387/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067
**[Test build #85387 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85387/testReport)**
for PR 20067 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
This is only valid when by coincidence the all expressions involved can use
statement as output. As I looked at the codebase, I think only few expressions
can output statement. This may not apply
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
I did a search but can't find one in the current codebase, but I do think
this is a valid idea, e.g. a simple example would be `a + b + z`, if
expressions can output statement, then we just
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
Thanks for the PR. Why are we complicating the PR by doing the rename? Does
this actually gain anything other than minor cosmetic changes? It makes the
simple PR pretty long ...
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076#discussion_r158663731
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/CompressionCodecSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076#discussion_r158663721
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/CompressionCodecSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85391/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
**[Test build #85391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85391/testReport)**
for PR 19527 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
Unit tests are reformatted too.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85389/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
**[Test build #85389 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85389/testReport)**
for PR 19527 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
**[Test build #85390 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85390/testReport)**
for PR 20080 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
**[Test build #85391 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85391/testReport)**
for PR 19527 at commit
GitHub user wangyum opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
[SPARK-22870][CORE] Dynamic allocation should allow 0 idle time
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr to make `0` as a valid value for
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527#discussion_r158659399
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/OneHotEncoderEstimator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527
**[Test build #85389 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85389/testReport)**
for PR 19527 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527#discussion_r158659167
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/OneHotEncoderEstimator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19527#discussion_r158659174
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/OneHotEncoderEstimator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,479 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
**[Test build #85388 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85388/testReport)**
for PR 20076 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20076
Retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067
**[Test build #85387 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85387/testReport)**
for PR 20067 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
Thanks you, @gatorsmile and @wangyum
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20067#discussion_r158657480
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2760,6 +2760,17 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
The problem found by this PR is just one of the issues that returns NULL
when SPARK SQL is unable to process it. Below is another example. I believe we
can find more.
```SQL
SELECT
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
LGTM, thanks @dongjoon-hyun
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85385/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059
**[Test build #85385 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85385/testReport)**
for PR 20059 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85384/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954
**[Test build #85384 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85384/testReport)**
for PR 19954 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85386/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
**[Test build #85386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85386/testReport)**
for PR 20079 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20072
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85383/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20072
**[Test build #85383 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85383/testReport)**
for PR 20072 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19929
@gatorsmile, yes, the reason why seed doesn't work is in the way Python
UDFs are executed, i.e. a new python process is created for each partition to
evaluate the Python UDF. Thus the seed is set
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
Thank you, @gatorsmile !
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
**[Test build #85386 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85386/testReport)**
for PR 20079 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
cc @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20064
Hi, @gatorsmile and @wangyum .
This PR seems to break Jenkins tests. Please see my hotfix.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20079
[SPARK-22893][SQL][HOTFIX] Fix a error message of VersionsSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20064 breaks Jenkins tests
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
Thanks @gatorsmile. Then should I create a follow up PR for #20008 in order
to cover the cases 2 and 3 before going on with this PR or can we go on with
this PR and the test cases added in this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20059
**[Test build #85385 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85385/testReport)**
for PR 20059 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954
**[Test build #85384 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85384/testReport)**
for PR 19954 at commit
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651951
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterManager.scala
---
@@ -45,6 +45,59 @@
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651945
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/k8s/SparkPodInitContainer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651953
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterManager.scala
---
@@ -45,6 +45,59 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85382/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651933
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -132,30 +131,84 @@ private[spark] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651930
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/submit/DriverConfigOrchestrator.scala
---
@@ -98,28 +109,62 @@
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651915
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -132,30 +131,84 @@ private[spark] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #85382 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85382/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651909
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Config.scala
---
@@ -132,30 +131,84 @@ private[spark] object
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651386
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/k8s/SparkPodInitContainer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954#discussion_r158651523
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterManager.scala
---
@@ -45,6 +45,59
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
