Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20203
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85869/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20203
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19893#discussion_r160501177
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SharedSQLContext.scala ---
@@ -17,4 +17,22 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.test
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20203
**[Test build #85869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85869/testReport)**
for PR 20203 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20203
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
**[Test build #85867 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85867/testReport)**
for PR 20013 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18991
**[Test build #85868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85868/testReport)**
for PR 18991 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18991
I reopen it to re-test the master branch with this option before Apache
Spark 2.3.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18991
[SPARK-21783][SQL][WIP] Turn on ORC filter push-down by default
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
ORC filter push-down is disabled by default from the beginning,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85856/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85856/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19290
ok sounds good -- we'll keep things 'old' for now.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user tomasatdatabricks commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160496086
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/image.py ---
@@ -71,9 +88,30 @@ def ocvTypes(self):
"""
if self._ocvTypes is None:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20209
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20209
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85866/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20209
**[Test build #85866 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85866/testReport)**
for PR 20209 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20209
**[Test build #85866 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85866/testReport)**
for PR 20209 at commit
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20209
[SPARK-23008][ML] OnehotEncoderEstimator python API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
OnehotEncoderEstimator python API.
## How was this patch tested?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85854/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
**[Test build #85854 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85854/testReport)**
for PR 20200 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
**[Test build #85865 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85865/testReport)**
for PR 20208 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
Hi, @gatorsmile , @cloud-fan , @HyukjinKwon , @viirya .
Could you review this PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85860/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
[SPARK-23007][SQL][TEST] Add schema evolution test suite for file-based
data sources
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A schema can evolve in several ways and the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
**[Test build #85860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85860/testReport)**
for PR 20207 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20179#discussion_r160489460
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/IndexShuffleBlockResolver.scala ---
@@ -196,11 +196,24 @@ private[spark] class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160486870
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/LiveEntity.scala ---
@@ -119,118 +121,115 @@ private class LiveTask(
import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85859/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
**[Test build #85859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85859/testReport)**
for PR 20206 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85857/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
**[Test build #85857 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85857/testReport)**
for PR 20205 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
I'd just suggest trying it. Since this PR is a patch for master, please
message me personally at m...@allman.ms to discuss progress and questions
on a backport to 2.2. If we get it working,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
**[Test build #85864 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85864/testReport)**
for PR 20023 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
**[Test build #85863 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85863/testReport)**
for PR 20023 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85862 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85862/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
Sorry for noice. I made some clean up and just rebased.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20179#discussion_r160481843
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/IndexShuffleBlockResolver.scala ---
@@ -196,11 +196,24 @@ private[spark] class
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20186
> I think it's fine. We usually don't test if a config can be correctly set
as it's so trivial...
The point is to test that the code using that config works as expected, not
that it can be
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160478184
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/LiveEntity.scala ---
@@ -119,118 +121,115 @@ private class LiveTask(
import
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20153#discussion_r160477594
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ColumnarBatchScan.scala
---
@@ -17,21 +17,24 @@
package
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20153#discussion_r160477447
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/SupportsScanColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20153
Is `ColumnarBatchScan` appropriate name for now? This is because if
`supportBatch` is false, the class handles scan from a `row`, not `columnar` or
`batch`.
---
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
> the memory usage will be much larger with InMemoryStore.
No it won't. The in-memory store does not use extra memory for indices. It
sorts the data when the index is read, and discards that
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160475957
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusStore.scala
---
@@ -110,107 +114,238 @@ private[spark] class AppStatusStore(
if
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160475833
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/storeTypes.scala ---
@@ -69,51 +71,271 @@ private[spark] class JobDataWrapper(
val
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160475752
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusStore.scala
---
@@ -110,107 +114,238 @@ private[spark] class AppStatusStore(
if
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20153#discussion_r160472490
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ColumnarBatchScan.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +147,25 @@ private[sql] trait ColumnarBatchScan
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20158
Ping @rednaxelafx
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user liufengdb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
BTW, if you don't mind, could you update the followings? It's @viirya 's
comment, so I made a followup, but we had better have this in your PR. To make
another follow-up is overkill. :)
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
This change alone is pretty harmless. If it seems to work as intended,
seems OK? Again, just wondering if `cachedExecutorIdleTimeoutS` should be the
same, and check for nonnegative values?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85853/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
**[Test build #85853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85853/testReport)**
for PR 20202 at commit
Github user RussellSpitzer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20190
@zsxwing I think you were the last to touch this code, could you please
review?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205#discussion_r160461130
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcColumnarBatchReader.java
---
@@ -196,17 +234,26 @@ public void
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
**[Test build #85861 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85861/testReport)**
for PR 20189 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
**[Test build #85860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85860/testReport)**
for PR 20207 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
[SPARK-23000] [FOLLOW-UP] Fix Flaky test suite
DataSourceWithHiveMetastoreCatalogSuite in Spark 2.3 [WIP]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Tried to reproduce it.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85858/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
**[Test build #85859 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85859/testReport)**
for PR 20206 at commit
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
[SPARK-19256][SQL] Remove ordering enforcement from `FileFormatWriter` and
let planner do that
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Thks is as per discussion in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
**[Test build #85857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85857/testReport)**
for PR 20205 at commit
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
This is awesome. Thanks @HyukjinKwon!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20163#discussion_r160450067
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/EvaluatePython.scala
---
@@ -120,10 +121,18 @@ object EvaluatePython {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
cc @dongjoon-hyun @viirya @kiszk @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
[SPARK-16060][SQL][follow-up] add a wrapper solution for vectorized orc
reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is mostly from
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85856/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20201
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85852/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20201
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20201
**[Test build #85852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85852/testReport)**
for PR 20201 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85851/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85855/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
cc @icexelloss too. I think we had a small talk about this before.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
**[Test build #85851 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85851/testReport)**
for PR 20200 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
cc @rxin, @felixcheung, @ueshin, @holdenk and @JoshRosen. Here, I made it
based on #20151. Could you take a look for this one too? I can make this PR
separate from #20151 by manually adding the
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
[SPARK-7721][PYTHON][TESTS] Adds PySpark coverage generation script
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Note that this PR was made based on the top of
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204#discussion_r160445389
--- Diff: python/run-tests.py ---
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ def main():
task_queue = Queue.PriorityQueue()
for python_exec in
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20171#discussion_r160441123
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -3616,6 +3616,34 @@ def test_vectorized_udf_basic(self):
bool_f(col('bool')))
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160432982
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcReadBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,435 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
Thank you so much, @cloud-fan , @mmccline , @viirya , @henrify , @kiszk ,
@HyukjinKwon !
I'll proceed to follow-ups.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
hive one is the same with mysql one;
```
hive> create table t(a BINARY);
OK
hive> INSERT INTO t values('abc');
OK
hive> select CAST(a AS STRING) from t;
OK
abc
```
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
**[Test build #85854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85854/testReport)**
for PR 20200 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20203
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user attilapiros opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20203
[SPARK-22577] [core] executor page blacklist status should update with
TaskSet level blacklisting
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this PR stage blacklisting is
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
Thanks! Next, I'll fix `showString` though, one question; currently casting
binary to string is different between
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20140
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
LGTM, merging to master/2.3!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
thanks, merging to master/2.3! Let's address the comments in follow-up.
BTW @dongjoon-hyun let's keep our discussion on
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160326383
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
**[Test build #85853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85853/testReport)**
for PR 20202 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20199#discussion_r160408416
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
301 - 400 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
