Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20438#discussion_r164717772
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/vectorized/ColumnVector.java ---
@@ -195,6 +196,7 @@
* struct field.
*/
public
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20438#discussion_r164719793
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/vectorized/ColumnarArray.java ---
@@ -135,9 +135,7 @@ public UTF8String getUTF8String(int ordinal) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
**[Test build #86813 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86813/testReport)**
for PR 20434 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436
**[Test build #86821 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86821/testReport)**
for PR 20436 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20431
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86811/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20431
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20431
**[Test build #86811 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86811/testReport)**
for PR 20431 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20343
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20343
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86812/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20343
**[Test build #86812 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86812/testReport)**
for PR 20343 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
**[Test build #86820 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86820/testReport)**
for PR 20435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86820/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/382/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
**[Test build #86820 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86820/testReport)**
for PR 20435 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20378
> One question I have is, do the current violations cause significant
document error?
I think this is a good point. Maybe, we could enable ones fixing actual
significant problems, at
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20427
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20427
thanks, merging to master/2.3!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20438
**[Test build #86819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86819/testReport)**
for PR 20438 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20438
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
@HyukjinKwon I'm afraid that's not enough because we need to synchronize at
all the places we touch the `defaultSession`, otherwise another thread can set
the value between `defaultSession.get() eq
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20438
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/381/
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20438
cc @sameeragarwal @viirya @kiszk @ueshin @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20438
[SPARK-23272][SQL] add calendar interval type support to ColumnVector
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`ColumnVector` is aimed to support all the data types, but
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20437
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20432
**[Test build #86818 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86818/testReport)**
for PR 20432 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20432
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20432
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/380/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20437
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20433
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86810/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20433
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20433
**[Test build #86810 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86810/testReport)**
for PR 20433 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20427
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86805/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20437
[SPARK-23270][Streaming][WEB-UI]FileInputDStream Streaming UI 's records
should not be set to the default value of 0, it should be the total number of
rows of new files.
## What changes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20427
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20432
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20427
**[Test build #86805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86805/testReport)**
for PR 20427 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20432
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20432
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86803/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20432
**[Test build #86803 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86803/testReport)**
for PR 20432 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
**[Test build #86817 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86817/testReport)**
for PR 20435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86817/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
**[Test build #86817 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86817/testReport)**
for PR 20435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/379/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20422
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20422
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86806/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20422
**[Test build #86806 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86806/testReport)**
for PR 20422 at commit
Github user ashashwat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436
@HyukjinKwon Let me go ahead and check all the scripts for similar
instances or typos.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19340
@Kevin-Ferret pointed out that both the input and the centers should be
normalized to unit Euclidean length. Citing you,
> the solution is also the arithmetic mean only if all vectors are
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436
I would rather suggest to fix these together in the followup already open,
20432 or find out more typos while we are here.
Can you take another look for other scripts and check if there are
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436
**[Test build #86816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86816/testReport)**
for PR 20436 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436#discussion_r164706951
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ export "PYLINT_HOME=$PYTHONPATH"
export "PATH=$PYTHONPATH:$PATH"
# There is no need to
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20408
**[Test build #86815 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86815/testReport)**
for PR 20408 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user ashashwat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20436
[SPARK-23174][DOC][PYTHON] python code style checker update fix.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Consistency in style, grammar and removal of extraneous characters.
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386#discussion_r164703291
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/sources/ConsoleWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -34,9 +33,9 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
How about something like this?
```diff
--- a/python/pyspark/sql/session.py
+++ b/python/pyspark/sql/session.py
@@ -213,10 +213,10 @@ class SparkSession(object):
Github user Jiri-Kremser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19802
@srowen was Jenkins ok with the change? I can't see the results.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/378/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
For perfectness, I think we should hold a lock with JVM instance but I
wonder if it's easily possible. I roughly knew this but I think underestimated
this because I believe that will quite
Github user rednaxelafx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434#discussion_r164687283
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -660,12 +660,10 @@ object SQLConf {
val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86814/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
**[Test build #86814 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86814/testReport)**
for PR 20435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
**[Test build #86814 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86814/testReport)**
for PR 20435 at commit
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
[SPARK-23268][SQL]Reorganize packages in data source V2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. create a new package for partitioning/distribution related classes.
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19340
@mgaido91 @srowen I have the same concern as @Kevin-Ferret and @viirya
I don't find the normailization of vectors before training, and the update
of center seems incorrect.
The
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20361#discussion_r164685543
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -377,6 +377,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20430
CC @wzhfy
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386
I like this change! It adds a missing feature which is required for
migrating the file-based data source(which use `FileCommitProtocol` and has a
callback for task commit), and also make it
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386#discussion_r164681157
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/sources/ConsoleWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -34,9 +33,9 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386#discussion_r164680877
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MemorySinkV2Suite.scala
---
@@ -41,19 +41,22 @@ class MemorySinkV2Suite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386#discussion_r164680686
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/sources/memoryV2.scala
---
@@ -135,14 +142,21 @@ class MemoryStreamWriter(val
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386#discussion_r164680538
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/sources/ConsoleWriter.scala
---
@@ -39,13 +41,20 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386#discussion_r164680632
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/sources/memoryV2.scala
---
@@ -118,14 +118,21 @@ class MemoryWriter(sink:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386#discussion_r164680081
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/WriteToDataSourceV2.scala
---
@@ -54,10 +54,6 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18339
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user sameeragarwal closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20231
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20427
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20378
One question I have is, do the current violations cause significant
document error?
Overall this is a good idea. However, is it worth enforcedly applying this
if we consider the effort of
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20427#discussion_r164676886
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DataSourceV2Relation.scala
---
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434#discussion_r164676771
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -660,12 +660,10 @@ object SQLConf {
val
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
@felixcheung I see, in that case, we should revert the last commit
(cc4b8510c1445fb742c0d750958d352adfa84902) to check the default session is
updated or not?
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20378#discussion_r164672962
--- Diff: dev/run-tests.py ---
@@ -576,7 +576,10 @@ def main():
for f in changed_files):
#
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/377/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
cc @sameeragarwal @zsxwing @rxin @cloud-fan @rednaxelafx @yhuai
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
**[Test build #86813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86813/testReport)**
for PR 20434 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
[SPARK-23267] [SQL] Increase spark.sql.codegen.hugeMethodLimit to 65535
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Still saw the performance regression introduced by
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20433
**[Test build #86810 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86810/testReport)**
for PR 20433 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20343
**[Test build #86812 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86812/testReport)**
for PR 20343 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20343
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/376/
501 - 600 of 664 matches
Mail list logo
