Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20422#discussion_r165225733
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/IndexShuffleBlockResolverSuite.scala
---
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20461#discussion_r165225508
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/OneForOneBlockFetcher.java
---
@@ -171,7 +171,9 @@ private void
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
**[Test build #86895 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86895/testReport)**
for PR 20460 at commit
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872#discussion_r165224852
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ object ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86894/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
**[Test build #86894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86894/testReport)**
for PR 20460 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/447/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
**[Test build #86894 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86894/testReport)**
for PR 20460 at commit
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460#discussion_r165223463
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1220,14 +1220,15 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460#discussion_r165223500
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -267,7 +267,11 @@ private[deploy] class
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
Yeah, that's what I was thinking of. Subclasses of `App` don't necessarily
work in Spark (not just Scala). I don't know if that has changed as Spark and
Scala moved forward. While that's an
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r165222051
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/OneForOneBlockFetcher.java
---
@@ -126,4 +150,38 @@ private void
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460#discussion_r165221502
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -267,7 +267,11 @@ private[deploy] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460#discussion_r165221518
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1220,14 +1220,15 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
I did the experiment that I asked about at
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419#issuecomment-361359825 , and
verified that under the current implementation, this PR will not affect the
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872#discussion_r165220142
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ object ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r165214410
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/OneForOneBlockFetcher.java
---
@@ -126,4 +150,38 @@ private void
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20461#discussion_r165213755
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/OneForOneBlockFetcher.java
---
@@ -171,7 +171,9 @@ private void
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19041#discussion_r165207476
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -246,6 +251,38 @@ class BlockManagerMasterEndpoint(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19041#discussion_r165207798
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -246,6 +251,38 @@ class BlockManagerMasterEndpoint(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19041#discussion_r165210078
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheRecoveryManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mantovani commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
I just tested with Scala 2.10.6 and worked perfect.
18/01/31 17:21:28 INFO DAGScheduler: Job 1 finished: count at
Bootstrap.scala:14, took 0.024446 s
DemoBug: rslt1 = 3 rslt2 = 3
Github user gerashegalov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20327#discussion_r165206579
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -744,7 +744,9 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456#discussion_r165205764
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -667,6 +667,55 @@ def repartition(self, numPartitions, *cols):
else:
raise
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456#discussion_r165205030
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -667,6 +667,55 @@ def repartition(self, numPartitions, *cols):
else:
raise
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
Did you try it with Scala 2.10? That's still supported by Spark.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456
cc @ueshin @HyukjinKwon
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20462
**[Test build #86893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86893/testReport)**
for PR 20462 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20462
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/446/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20462
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mantovani commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
Hello Marcel,
This is an old bug and was fixed long time ago, I just runned the following
example and got the correct result:
DemoBug: rslt1 = 3 rslt2 = 3
Doesn't make
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20462
@cloud-fan @sameeragarwal hopefully the last one.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20462
[SPARK-23020][core] Fix another race in the in-process launcher test.
First the bad news: there's an unfixable race in the launcher code.
(By unfixable I mean it would take a lot more effort
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453#discussion_r165203182
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453#discussion_r165201975
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20461
**[Test build #86892 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86892/testReport)**
for PR 20461 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20461
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/445/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20461
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20461
cc @cloud-fan @squito
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20461
[SPARK-23289][CORE]OneForOneBlockFetcher.DownloadCallback.onData should
write the bufer fully
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`channel.write(buf)` may not write the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
Thanks a LOT @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
LGTM
Thanks! Merged to master/2.3/2.2
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-spark-integration/442/
---
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453#discussion_r165198141
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
**[Test build #86891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86891/testReport)**
for PR 20459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/444/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-spark-integration/442/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/443/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460#discussion_r165195110
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -267,7 +267,11 @@ private[deploy] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
**[Test build #86890 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86890/testReport)**
for PR 20460 at commit
GitHub user liyinan926 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20460
[SPARK-23285][K8S] Allow fractional values for spark.executor.cores
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
K8s treats CPU as a "compressible resource" and can actually
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20327
cc @vanzin since you are expert on this topic.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r165193691
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/OneForOneBlockFetcher.java
---
@@ -126,4 +150,38 @@ private void
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453#discussion_r165193579
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ class Analyzer(
//
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20327#discussion_r165193521
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -744,7 +744,9 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils with
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459#discussion_r165189663
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ private[feature] trait
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
> It's not just "will" work, it's working.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4170
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20415
LGTM, only a minor comment
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20415#discussion_r165188943
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -326,22 +325,23 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
**[Test build #86889 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86889/testReport)**
for PR 20459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86889/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
**[Test build #86889 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86889/testReport)**
for PR 20459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/442/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mantovani commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
It's not just "will" work, _it's working_. I never said that it wasn't
working, the Scala example was wrote using Java "style" not Scala "style" which
. Which you don't create a main method but
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20385
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20385
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86887/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20385
**[Test build #86887 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86887/testReport)**
for PR 20385 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20459
[SPARK-23107][ML] ML 2.3 QA: New Scala APIs, docs.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Audit new APIs and docs in 2.3.0.
## How was this patch tested?
No test.
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
IIRC extending App won't work, or didn't. The example is already correct.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user mantovani commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
I just changed to the right section.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mantovani commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458#discussion_r165180039
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -299,19 +299,17 @@ We'll create a very simple Spark application,
`SimpleApp.java`:
import
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r165178844
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/OneForOneBlockFetcher.java
---
@@ -126,4 +150,38 @@ private void
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458#discussion_r165178509
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -299,19 +299,17 @@ We'll create a very simple Spark application,
`SimpleApp.java`:
import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19802
I think this is the wrong place for the fix, if one is desired. The
transport library doesn't know anything about serialization, that's all handled
by the code using it. In this case, the 'RpcEnv'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86884/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
**[Test build #86884 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86884/testReport)**
for PR 20454 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
the example is written in Java, not in Scala. I think you can close this
PR, thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20457
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86888/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20457
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20457
**[Test build #86888 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86888/testReport)**
for PR 20457 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18423
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20442
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20442
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86886/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20442
**[Test build #86886 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86886/testReport)**
for PR 20442 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20161
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
GitHub user mantovani opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20458
changed scala example from java "style" to scala
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I changed an example wrote in Scala using Java "style" to Scala "style".
## How
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20161
Alright merging to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
cc @gatorsmile @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20422#discussion_r165161260
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/IndexShuffleBlockResolverSuite.scala
---
@@ -133,4 +133,65 @@ class
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20422#discussion_r165159188
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/IndexShuffleBlockResolverSuite.scala
---
@@ -133,4 +133,65 @@ class
301 - 400 of 624 matches
Mail list logo
