GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20502
[SPARK-23330][WebUI] Spark UI SQL executions page throws NPE
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark SQL executions page throws the following error and the page
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87041/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87042/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
**[Test build #87042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87042/testReport)**
for PR 20499 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
**[Test build #87041 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87041/testReport)**
for PR 20498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
**[Test build #87042 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87042/testReport)**
for PR 20499 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/571/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499#discussion_r165834947
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1587,6 +1600,51 @@ def replace(self, to_replace, value=None,
subset=None):
|null|
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87039/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
**[Test build #87039 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87039/testReport)**
for PR 20500 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20501
I'm/We're aware of this and to keep diff small and manageable for
backporting fixes, it is preferable to avoid broad changes like this.
We can revisit when new releases are stable down,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20501
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87040/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20501
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20501
**[Test build #87040 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87040/testReport)**
for PR 20501 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/570/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
**[Test build #87041 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87041/testReport)**
for PR 20498 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20501
**[Test build #87040 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87040/testReport)**
for PR 20501 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20501
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/569/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20501
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user rekhajoshm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20501
[SPARK-22430][Docs] Unknown tag warnings when building R docs with Roxygen
6.0.1
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removed @export tag to get rid of unknown tag warnings
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20164
@srowen yeah, all models exist this issue. Although, a little difference,
for other models, it is very straightforward for user to call
`setRawPrediction` to avoid overwrite the same name
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
**[Test build #87039 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87039/testReport)**
for PR 20500 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/568/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user rekhajoshm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20500
[SPARK-14023][MLlib] Make exceptions consistent regarding fields and columns
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make exceptions consistent regarding fields and columns
Github user yucai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
Thanks @wangyum for this nice data support!
Now, we can see obvious time reduce from this feature.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499#discussion_r165828519
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1587,6 +1600,51 @@ def replace(self, to_replace, value=None,
subset=None):
|null| null|null|
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499#discussion_r165828448
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1587,6 +1600,51 @@ def replace(self, to_replace, value=None,
subset=None):
|null| null|null|
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
I think this is what originally proposed in the JIRA:
>It is possible to use dict as to_replace, but we cannot skip or use None
as the value value (although it is ignored). This requires
Github user akopich commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19565
@hhbyyh who shall we ping?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Yes sure,I'll rebase my PR after this is merged.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20359
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20359
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87036/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20359
**[Test build #87036 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87036/testReport)**
for PR 20359 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87038/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
**[Test build #87038 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87038/testReport)**
for PR 20499 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87037/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
**[Test build #87037 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87037/testReport)**
for PR 20499 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
If possible, I prefer to doing it in this PR. We should merge this
test-only PR to 2.3 and master for verifying the behavior of the changes made
in 2.3.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/567/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19565
It's probably better to wait for the opinion from a committer.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
@gatorsmile yes, I see what you mean, we should keep it to check that
changing `spark.sql.decimalOperations.allowPrecisionLoss` doesn't affect this
case, you are right. I will comment on my PR and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
**[Test build #87038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87038/testReport)**
for PR 20499 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
@mgaido91 If we remove it, we still need test cases for verifying the
effects of `spark.sql.decimalOperations.allowPrecisionLoss`.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
The linked JIRA targets 2.3.0 and it was an alternative of reverting
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20496#issuecomment-362843558 .. Let me
rebase it here anyway ..
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20496
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
@gatorsmile because this is an example of overflow, ie. what is covered in
the new PR: in the new PR I added many tests for this case, so I felt this
unnecessary.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Thanks!
Also cc @ueshin @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
> We need a separate JIRA and target it to 2.3
Sure.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20496
LGTM
Thanks for your quick PR! Merged to master/2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
cc @rxin, @gatorsmile, @holdenk, @zero323 and @viirya, this is an
alternative of reverting its alias matching, and a fix to address
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
**[Test build #87037 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87037/testReport)**
for PR 20499 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Hm .. could't we backport this to 2.3 as well? Or, do you suggest to make
the current change to branch-2.3 only?
---
-
To
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/566/
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20495#discussion_r165821762
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1705,10 +1705,12 @@ def unhex(col):
@ignore_unicode_prefix
@since(1.5)
def length(col):
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
@HyukjinKwon We need a separate PR and target it to 2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499#discussion_r165821715
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2245,11 +2245,6 @@ def test_replace(self):
.replace(False, True).first())
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20497
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
@mgaido91 We just remove this test case? I think we can still keep it,
right?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20499
[SPARK-19454][PYTHON][FOLLOWUP] Disallow default value None when
'to_replace' is not a dictionary
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to disallow
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20497
Thanks! Merged to master/2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
@wangyum yes, you're right. I don't know how I missed it, I am very sorry
for my mistake. Anyway, this is fixed also in this PR #20350, which is the
"second part" of making Spark SQL-2011
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498#discussion_r165821454
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/typeCoercion/native/decimalArithmeticOperations.sql
---
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ select 1e35 / 0.1;
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498#discussion_r165820795
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/typeCoercion/native/decimalArithmeticOperations.sql
---
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ select 1e35 / 0.1;
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87035/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
**[Test build #87035 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87035/testReport)**
for PR 20498 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87034/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
**[Test build #87034 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87034/testReport)**
for PR 20498 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20484#discussion_r165820198
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1776,6 +1776,42 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20493#discussion_r165819565
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusUtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20495#discussion_r165819296
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1705,10 +1705,12 @@ def unhex(col):
@ignore_unicode_prefix
@since(1.5)
def
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498#discussion_r165819002
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/typeCoercion/native/decimalArithmeticOperations.sql
---
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ select 1e35 / 0.1;
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20359
**[Test build #87036 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87036/testReport)**
for PR 20359 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20359
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20359
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/565/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20359
Retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20484#discussion_r165818791
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1776,6 +1776,42 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20479
Thank you, @HyukjinKwon and @gatorsmile .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456#discussion_r165818765
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -667,6 +667,92 @@ def repartition(self, numPartitions, *cols):
else:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
**[Test build #87035 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87035/testReport)**
for PR 20498 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/564/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
**[Test build #87034 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87034/testReport)**
for PR 20498 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
retest please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87029/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20498
**[Test build #87029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87029/testReport)**
for PR 20498 at commit
Github user Stephan202 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20057#discussion_r165814532
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/DB2Dialect.scala ---
@@ -49,4 +49,16 @@ private object DB2Dialect extends JdbcDialect {
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
