Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/2405/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
**[Test build #89474 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89474/testReport)**
for PR 21061 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21078
Thanks for thinking through the optional logging issue! I responded in the
JIRA to preserve the design discussion there:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23990
---
Github user aviv-ebates closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21057
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21057
Right, let me try to cherry-pick and see if I can write a test. Will try to
have some time and open a PR after cherry-picking your commit. I think you can
close this PR.
---
Github user jose-torres commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21063
The approach looks good to me, but we probably want to add some tests to
StreamingQueryStatusAndProgressSuite. (See test("basic") in ContinuousSuite for
how to set up a continuous processing
Github user susanxhuynh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20641#discussion_r182271196
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterSchedulerSuite.scala
---
@@ -199,6 +199,38 @@
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21081#discussion_r182269723
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -123,7 +128,21 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21081#discussion_r182269644
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -123,7 +128,21 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
Github user jose-torres commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21029#discussion_r182267906
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DataSourceV2ScanExec.scala
---
@@ -95,21 +77,29 @@ case class
Github user henryr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21070
@scottcarey I agree that's important. Perhaps it could be done as a
follow-up PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89471/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
**[Test build #89471 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89471/testReport)**
for PR 21089 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090#discussion_r182254888
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
Take a quick look. Despite of the style failure and a minor format issue,
LGTM.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090#discussion_r182243819
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClusteringSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19881
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89467/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19881
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19881
**[Test build #89467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89467/testReport)**
for PR 19881 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89470/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
**[Test build #89470 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89470/testReport)**
for PR 21061 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21073
**[Test build #89473 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89473/testReport)**
for PR 21073 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89468/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
**[Test build #89468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89468/testReport)**
for PR 21061 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89466/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
**[Test build #89466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89466/testReport)**
for PR 21061 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21085
known flaky test https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23894
merging to branch 2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21081#discussion_r182216309
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -90,7 +90,12 @@ private[clustering] trait KMeansParams extends Params
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21081#discussion_r182216415
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -90,7 +90,12 @@ private[clustering] trait KMeansParams extends Params
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21081#discussion_r182215434
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -123,7 +128,21 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21081#discussion_r182217722
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -123,7 +128,21 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21081#discussion_r182215639
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -123,7 +128,21 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
Github user attilapiros commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068
Yes we can create an abstract class from `YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker`
(like `AbstractAllocatorBlacklistTracker`) where the method
`synchronizeBlacklistedNodes` can have different
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
OK sorry to push @wangmiao1981 ! I just want to make sure this gets in
before I no longer have bandwidth for it. If you have the time, would you mind
checking the updates I made in the new PR?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/2404/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89472/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
**[Test build #89472 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89472/testReport)**
for PR 21090 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
@wangmiao1981 and @WeichenXu123 would you mind taking a look? Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
**[Test build #89472 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89472/testReport)**
for PR 21090 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
**To review this PR**: This was copied from
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770 with the following changes:
* Addressed comments in original PR (See my review comments there)
*
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21090
[SPARK-15784][ML] Add Power Iteration Clustering to spark.ml
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds PowerIterationClustering as a Transformer to spark.ml. In
Github user maryannxue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21083
Thank you for you reply, @cloud-fan! I was not clear when you had become
aware of the effort on SPARK-21479 so it might be a misunderstanding on my side
and I apologize. Anyway, if you had had a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/2403/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
**[Test build #89471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89471/testReport)**
for PR 21089 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r182200622
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -417,3 +418,156 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
**[Test build #89470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89470/testReport)**
for PR 21061 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89469/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
**[Test build #89469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89469/testReport)**
for PR 21089 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
**[Test build #89469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89469/testReport)**
for PR 21089 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user MaxGekk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21089
[SPARK-24004] Test of from_json for non-root MapType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
New test checks that from_json is able to parse json contains MapType as a
value
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21086
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89464/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21086
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21086
**[Test build #89464 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89464/testReport)**
for PR 21086 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20998
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89460/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20998
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20998
**[Test build #89460 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89460/testReport)**
for PR 20998 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
@jkbradley I close this one now. Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
@jkbradley Sorry for missing your comments. Anyway, I will close it now. I
will choose another one to work on. Thanks!
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21088
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21088
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user devaraj-kavali opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21088
[SPARK-24003][CORE] Add support to provide spark.executor.extraJavaOptions
in terms of App Id and/or Executor Id's
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added support
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21082
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21082
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89462/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21082
**[Test build #89462 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89462/testReport)**
for PR 21082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89465/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20787
**[Test build #89465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89465/testReport)**
for PR 20787 at commit
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21071
@gatorsmile we need to have this for K8S as well, will include it in SPIP.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21074
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89459/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21074
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21074
**[Test build #89459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89459/testReport)**
for PR 21074 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/2402/
Github user scottcarey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21070
This PR should include changes to `ParquetOptions.scala` to expose the
`LZ4`, `ZSTD` and `BROTLI` parquet compression codecs, or else spark users
won't be able to leverage those parquet 1.10.0
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21071
@devaraj-kavali How about K8S?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
**[Test build #89468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89468/testReport)**
for PR 21061 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21071
cc @jiangxb1987 @JoshRosen
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21071
Thanks @rxin and @markhamstra for your comments, I will come up with SPIP
design draft and start the discussion.
---
-
Github user efimpoberezkin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21063
Hi @jose-torres, I made some changes to this PR according to your comment,
could you review it please?
---
-
To
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20858
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20858
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89456/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89461/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21029
**[Test build #89461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89461/testReport)**
for PR 21029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20858
**[Test build #89456 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89456/testReport)**
for PR 20858 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15113
I still think this makes sense, but maybe I'm the minority. I'll go ahead
and close it unless anyone else thinks it should be changed.
---
Github user BryanCutler closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15113
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19881
Thanks @jcuquemelle
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
101 - 200 of 499 matches
Mail list logo
