Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21067#discussion_r194558081
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -59,16
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21452
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21532
[SPARK-24524][SQL]Improve aggregateMetrics: reduce memory usage and number
of loops
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The function `aggregateMetrics` process
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21452
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21496
**[Test build #4199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4199/testReport)**
for PR 21496 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21205
**[Test build #4198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4198/testReport)**
for PR 21205 at commit
Github user ssuchter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21528
**[Test build #4197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4197/testReport)**
for PR 21528 at commit
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21527
@tgravescs If there is value in making it configurable, that is all fine
and good. My argument is against making it configurable just for the sake of
making it configurable. If there is more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/20/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3910/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20636
Sure, I will update this
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21527
**[Test build #91675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91675/testReport)**
for PR 21527 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21438
@felixcheung `metricIds` is not needed. We can get rid of it by using
`metricTypes `
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user ssuchter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21515
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/19/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21515
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/18/
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21527
yes it is debatable, but with it being configurable it gives you the option
to change. the only other way is to change the # of partitions which could be
more costly. There have been various
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/17/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21508
**[Test build #91674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91674/testReport)**
for PR 21508 at commit
Github user bkrieger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21508#discussion_r194539275
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1568,11 +1568,13 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user bkrieger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21508#discussion_r194539357
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1568,11 +1568,13 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user sandecho closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20708
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21515
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21515
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3909/
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21481
@kiszk when you were running findBugs locally, did you find more overflow
bugs that are not present in this PR? Let's put all discovered overflow bugs in
this PR and have another PR to integrate
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21481#discussion_r194537413
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/VariableLengthRowBasedKeyValueBatch.java
---
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21508#discussion_r194537508
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1568,11 +1568,13 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user sandecho closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20709
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21481#discussion_r194536447
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3908/
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21366#discussion_r194536061
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/ExecutorPodsSnapshotsStoreImpl.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21366#discussion_r194535271
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/ExecutorPodsSnapshotsStoreImpl.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20636
`BufferHolderSparkSubmitSuite` is really a bad test. What we want to
guarantee is, `BufferHolder` is always word-aligned. Is there a better way to
test it?
---
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21366#discussion_r194534077
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/ExecutorPodsSnapshotsStoreImpl.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21515
**[Test build #91673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91673/testReport)**
for PR 21515 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21531
cc @maryannxue
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3907/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21531#discussion_r194532610
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/CachedTableSuite.scala ---
@@ -83,25 +83,6 @@ class CachedTableSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user huaxingao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21513
Thanks a lot for your help! @mengxr @WeichenXu123
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21531
**[Test build #91672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91672/testReport)**
for PR 21531 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/16/
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r194527119
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2189,3 +2189,293 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r194516045
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2189,3 +2189,293 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r194523480
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2189,3 +2189,293 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r194520924
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2189,3 +2189,293 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r194530787
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2189,3 +2189,293 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r194520589
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2189,3 +2189,293 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r194520120
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2189,3 +2189,293 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r194517152
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2189,3 +2189,293 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21045
**[Test build #91671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91671/testReport)**
for PR 21045 at commit
GitHub user icexelloss opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21531
[SPARK-24521][SQL] Fix ineffective test in CachedTableSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
test("withColumn doesn't invalidate cached dataframe") in
Github user DylanGuedes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21045#discussion_r194530372
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -128,6 +128,170 @@ case class
Github user ssuchter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
comment
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ssuchter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ssuchter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ssuchter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
comment
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20636#discussion_r194526656
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/BufferHolder.java
---
@@ -61,6 +61,10 @@
* Grows the
Github user aalobaidi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21500
@HeartSaVioR
1. As I mentioned before, this option is beneficial for use cases with
bigger micro-batches. This way the overhead of loading the state from disk will
be spread across
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21427
Pandas UDF is already in 2 releases(2.3.0 and 2.3.1), we can't just change
the behavior. We think the old behavior doesn't make sense and users should
change their code, but users may not think
Github user tomhanetz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21512
I don't agree with you. Yes browsers are capable of doing auto refresh
through plugins (and actually this is the way I use the spark ui myself), but
the it seems like this is the only monitoring
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21438#discussion_r19457
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLAppStatusListener.scala
---
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ class SQLAppStatusListener(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21518
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21518
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3906/
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21518
lgtm assuming tests pass
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21518
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/15/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21518
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21518
**[Test build #91670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91670/testReport)**
for PR 21518 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21513
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21513
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-spark-integration/3759/
---
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21512
Browsers are able to do the auto refreshing work.
I think we should leave it for browsers, so that we can keep the UI code
simple.
---
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21258#discussion_r194514576
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -186,6 +186,50 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21258#discussion_r194514611
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -186,6 +186,50 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21475
lgtm
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/14/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21508
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21508
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91665/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21527
> We should make it configurable.
That's a debatable assertion all by itself -- and quite unfortunately,
there is no more justification for this claim in the JIRA ticket. Without proof
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21508
**[Test build #91665 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91665/testReport)**
for PR 21508 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21045#discussion_r194501372
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -128,6 +128,170 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21529
good catch! thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-spark-integration/3759/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3905/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21527
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21527
**[Test build #91669 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91669/testReport)**
for PR 21527 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21527
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91669/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21527
**[Test build #91669 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91669/testReport)**
for PR 21527 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21529#discussion_r194511635
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/EnsureRequirements.scala
---
@@ -227,9 +228,16 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21529
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
201 - 300 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
