Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21501
**[Test build #91652 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91652/testReport)**
for PR 21501 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21505#discussion_r194325153
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +113,23 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20887#discussion_r194321737
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2792,4 +2793,40 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user ssonker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21505#discussion_r194319491
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +113,23 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3890/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
**[Test build #91653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91653/testReport)**
for PR 21495 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
**[Test build #91654 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91654/testReport)**
for PR 20208 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21501
**[Test build #91652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91652/testReport)**
for PR 21501 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3889/
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21506
**[Test build #91651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91651/testReport)**
for PR 21506 at commit
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21506
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21505#discussion_r194309823
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +113,23 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21510#discussion_r194309780
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/WebUI.scala ---
@@ -101,12 +101,12 @@ private[spark] abstract class WebUI(
}
/**
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21514#discussion_r194308977
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/StandaloneSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
**[Test build #91650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91650/testReport)**
for PR 21495 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21506
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91649/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91650/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21506
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21506
**[Test build #91649 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91649/testReport)**
for PR 21506 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21427
How about we just start to have configurations classified for each version
if it sounds better to have configurations for each behaviour change? For
example, we could have postfix like spark_23
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21523
I think here the problem is that `filters` are only added for those handler
who added before server starts.
This may not be the only problem for `ThriftserverTab`, I guess `SQLTable`
or
Github user ssonker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21505#discussion_r194305723
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +113,23 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21427
@icexelloss @HyukjinKwon It is always simple to deprecate the confs in the
release of Spark 3.0. Let us make it configurable in the next release which is
Spark 2.4.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21202
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21202
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91647/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21202
**[Test build #91647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91647/testReport)**
for PR 21202 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3888/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
I decided to remove the hack I put to get the Spark UI consistent since
this hack will bring into more problems.
@som-snytt Is it possible to move the `printWelcome` and `splash.start()`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
**[Test build #91650 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91650/testReport)**
for PR 21495 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21504
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21504
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91645/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21504
**[Test build #91645 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91645/testReport)**
for PR 21504 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21505#discussion_r194299485
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +113,23 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21497
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91646/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21497
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ssonker commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21505
@kiszk I've added a benchmark according to your recommendation, please
review.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21497
**[Test build #91646 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91646/testReport)**
for PR 21497 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21520
For 1, I agree with you that it is not good to introduce many APIs at
first. On the other hand, it would be good to prepare only a few APIs that are
frequently used, not to prepare many APIs. It make
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21501#discussion_r194298446
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2610,6 +2610,9 @@ def setParams(self, inputCol=None, outputCol=None,
stopWords=None, caseSensitive
501 - 544 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
