Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #92246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92246/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
> I will first fix the tests, and then assert the performance if you agree.
Changing the annotations might impact the performance.
Ah, yea sure.
---
Github user Fokko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
I will first fix the tests, and then assert the performance if you agree.
Changing the annotations might impact the performance.
Regarding the difference between `NON_NULL`, `NON_ABSENT`,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21618
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21618
**[Test build #92245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92245/testReport)**
for PR 21618 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21618
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/432/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
re: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596#issuecomment-399639768
can we keep the previous behaviour although it's by kind of a bug in
Jackson? BTW, I thought we should use
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21614
@larry88, looks mistakenly open. Mind closing this please?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
BTW, I believe it's okay to use Jenkins resource if that's a faster way to
resolve this issue in any event.
---
-
To
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
@Fokko, btw, I believe
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596#issuecomment-399160931 is a valid
comment. I think it would be nicer if we execute this benchmark and update the
results in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21617
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92239/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21617
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user Fokko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
When looking at the history server, we have a similar issue. From at the
list command
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21617
**[Test build #92239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92239/testReport)**
for PR 21617 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596#discussion_r197604227
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JsonExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +244,13 @@ class
201 - 215 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
