Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21691
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21691
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682
@maropu We accidentally dropped the pushdown of these data types when we
refactored the file formats. You can check the change history and find the PR.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21691
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682
cc @gengliangwang
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682#discussion_r199390298
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ private[parquet] class
GitHub user xianbin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21691
Branch 2.2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199389588
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRowConverter.scala
---
@@ -182,18 +182,20 @@
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199368095
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -47,16 +47,25 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199364935
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -71,9 +80,22 @@ private[parquet]
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199389252
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -71,9 +80,22 @@ private[parquet]
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199356283
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -47,16 +47,25 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199354841
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -417,11 +417,12 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21320#discussion_r199365004
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetReadSupport.scala
---
@@ -47,16 +47,25 @@ import
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687#discussion_r199388576
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ case class CaseWhen(
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682
@HyukjinKwon btw, why we don't support pushdown for these types? Any
historical reason?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199387596
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
Sure. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24715 is created now.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687#discussion_r199386837
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ case class CaseWhen(
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21546#discussion_r199384074
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -3236,13 +3237,50 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21546#discussion_r199384249
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -3236,13 +3237,50 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199386302
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/613/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/613/
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687#discussion_r199385955
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -113,6 +113,35 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199385685
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/613/
---
Github user sujith71955 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20611
This PR is open from many days, we need this fix in our version code also,
can someone please review and provide me suggestions if any.
---
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199385323
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
**[Test build #92520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92520/testReport)**
for PR 21669 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21659#discussion_r199384118
--- Diff: python/docs/Makefile ---
@@ -1,19 +1,35 @@
# Makefile for Sphinx documentation
#
+ifndef SPHINXPYTHON
+SPHINXBUILD ?=
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21659#discussion_r199384289
--- Diff: python/docs/Makefile ---
@@ -1,19 +1,35 @@
# Makefile for Sphinx documentation
#
+ifndef SPHINXPYTHON
+SPHINXBUILD ?=
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21690
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21690
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21690
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user yuanboliu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21690
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user yuanboliu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21690
[SPARK-24713]AppMatser of spark streaming kafka OOM if there are hundâ¦
We have hundreds of kafka topics need to be consumed in one application.
The application master will throw OOM exception
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199380206
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199379979
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199379810
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199379854
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199379417
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199378189
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21495
@dongjoon-hyun can you please create a JIRA to track this issue.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648
I roughly double checked most of primitive types like Boolean, Long and
String work via Py4J, and some codes related with it in Py4J. Some types like
`Option[...]` will probably just return the
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21535
If we only test interpreted path on selected test suites, e.g.,
`org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.*`, I think we won't increase too much
test time. I feel that we should not make it different
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682
**[Test build #92519 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92519/testReport)**
for PR 21682 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21073#discussion_r199374528
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CollectionExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/612/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21073#discussion_r199374458
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -551,6 +551,36 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/611/
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21073#discussion_r199373569
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648
**[Test build #92518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92518/testReport)**
for PR 21648 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199373295
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648
LGTM for the changes.
I'm just wondering if all config types are supported by the PY4J method
call. Do we need some tests for that?
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21648#discussion_r199370180
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ def _ssql_ctx(self):
"""
return self._jsqlContext
+
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21675
ping @mcteo mind addressing
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21675#discussion_r199316192? I think it's
good to address before merging it in.
---
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
I'll see if I get a chance to look at this this week, but with the holiday
it may have to wait a week.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92517/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
**[Test build #92517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92517/testReport)**
for PR 21688 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
**[Test build #92517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92517/testReport)**
for PR 21688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21689
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21689
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21689
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user shahidki31 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21689
Minor correction in the powerIterationSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the power iteration clustering test in ml maps the results to the
labels 0 and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
**[Test build #92516 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92516/testReport)**
for PR 21688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92516/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
**[Test build #92516 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92516/testReport)**
for PR 21688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
**[Test build #92515 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92515/testReport)**
for PR 21688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92515/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
**[Test build #92515 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92515/testReport)**
for PR 21688 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user pgandhi999 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
@ajbozarth @vanzin @tgravescs Hello,
After our last discussion in PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19270,
I have made some changes to the datatables, to fetch the data and perform
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user pgandhi999 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21688
[SPARK-21809] : Change Stage Page to use datatables to support sorting
columns and searching
Support column sort, pagination and search for Stage Page using jQuery
DataTable and REST API.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92513/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687
**[Test build #92513 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92513/testReport)**
for PR 21687 at commit
Github user patrickmcgloin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21671#discussion_r199356020
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2163,9 +2163,9 @@ def json_tuple(col, *fields):
@since(2.1)
def from_json(col, schema,
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21535
I am not sure whether the increased time is acceptable or not.
If it is not accepted, how about adding an option to control do test in
interpreter mode. Then, we test only compiled code path
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17280
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17280
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92514/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17280
**[Test build #92514 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92514/testReport)**
for PR 17280 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21514#discussion_r199352058
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -130,7 +130,13 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17280
**[Test build #92514 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92514/testReport)**
for PR 17280 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17280
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/610/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92512/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17280
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
**[Test build #92512 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92512/testReport)**
for PR 21669 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21687
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
