Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r11214
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -19,166 +19,186 @@ package
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21708
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r11109
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -19,166 +19,186 @@ package
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682#discussion_r11024
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21321
@mgaido91, mind rebasing this please? Let me just get this in.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92587 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92587/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21702
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21702
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21659
Ah, I mean PRs in spark-website to fix the API documentation.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21659#discussion_r199989581
--- Diff: python/docs/Makefile ---
@@ -1,19 +1,44 @@
# Makefile for Sphinx documentation
#
+ifndef SPHINXBUILD
+ifndef
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92580/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
**[Test build #92580 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92580/testReport)**
for PR 21686 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21706
Adds tests in `sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/cast.sql` then
run `SPARK_GENERATE_GOLDEN_FILES=1 ./build/mvn -Dtest=none
-DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQueryTestSuite test`.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21433
**[Test build #4206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4206/testReport)**
for PR 21433 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/653/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
**[Test build #92586 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92586/testReport)**
for PR 21705 at commit
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21673
@arunmahadevan We'd be better to respect style guide on pull request:
please change title to include let JIRA issue number being guided with `[]` and
also add `[SS]`.
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705#discussion_r199986545
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/ExecutorSideSQLConfSuite.scala
---
@@ -63,4 +71,15 @@ class ExecutorSideSQLConfSuite extends
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682#discussion_r199986187
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21433
**[Test build #4205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4205/testReport)**
for PR 21433 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21709
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21709
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21542
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21542
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/652/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21709
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21542
**[Test build #92585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92585/testReport)**
for PR 21542 at commit
GitHub user jzhuge opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21709
[SPARK-5152][CORE] Read metrics config file from Hadoop file system
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Enable metrics config file to be read directly from Hadoop file
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92578/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
**[Test build #92578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92578/testReport)**
for PR 21686 at commit
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r199980993
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -19,166 +19,186 @@ package
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r199980897
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -19,166 +19,186 @@ package
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r199980632
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -19,166 +19,186 @@ package
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21696#discussion_r199979463
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -379,14 +366,29 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92577/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21657
ok, will revive the code here
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699
**[Test build #92577 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92577/testReport)**
for PR 21699 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/651/
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682
+1
I agree with some of the minor refactoring suggestions, but overall this
looks correct to me.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682#discussion_r199977784
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -69,6 +77,14 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
**[Test build #92584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92584/testReport)**
for PR 21705 at commit
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21682#discussion_r199977420
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699
Using either `Column` or `String` type was actually in my original PR:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7841
@rxin later modified the api to only take a `String` prior to the release
as part
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
**[Test build #92583 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92583/testReport)**
for PR 21705 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/650/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21701
**[Test build #92582 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92582/testReport)**
for PR 21701 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21701
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/649/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21701
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21701
jenkins retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
@cloud-fan, thanks for the thorough feedback!
> What catalog operations we want to forward to the data source catalog?
Currently it's create/drop/alter table, I think it's good enough for
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21067
@baluchicken @foxish any update on this? HA story is pretty critical for
production in many cases.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21655#discussion_r199963152
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -619,6 +619,7 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
**[Test build #92581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92581/testReport)**
for PR 21403 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
**[Test build #92580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92580/testReport)**
for PR 21686 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/648/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21588
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21588
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92573/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21708
**[Test build #92579 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92579/testReport)**
for PR 21708 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21588
**[Test build #92573 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92573/testReport)**
for PR 21588 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21708
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21708
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/647/
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21708
[BUILD] Close stale PRs
Closes #20932
Closes #17843
Closes #13477
Closes #14291
Closes #20919
Closes #17907
Closes #18766
Closes #20809
Closes #8849
Closes #21076
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8849
I think this should just be closed. I don't think there's enough value in
adding this API now.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21684
Hm, I actually doubt it's ever correct to parse the result of
`getErrorStream` here as JSON. It's going to be text or HTML document. The
comment shows the intent was to return the error message to
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21689#discussion_r199950647
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClusteringSuite.scala
---
@@ -76,23 +78,25 @@ class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21689#discussion_r199950628
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClusteringSuite.scala
---
@@ -76,23 +78,25 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21433
**[Test build #4205 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4205/testReport)**
for PR 21433 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
**[Test build #92578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92578/testReport)**
for PR 21686 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
I had an idea of a slightly different approach.. Would it be possible to
"promote" the regular `udf` to a `pandas_udf`? By this I mean wrap the
function using `apply()` so that it takes
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669#discussion_r199941392
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/Constants.scala
---
@@ -65,11 +65,13 @@ private[spark] object
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705#discussion_r199940775
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/StaticSQLConf.scala
---
@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ object StaticSQLConf {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92570/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21702
**[Test build #92570 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92570/testReport)**
for PR 21702 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21542
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92572/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21542
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21542
**[Test build #92572 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92572/testReport)**
for PR 21542 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r199938894
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,59 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705#discussion_r199935428
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/StaticSQLConf.scala
---
@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ object StaticSQLConf {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21705#discussion_r199936887
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/StaticSQLConf.scala
---
@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ object StaticSQLConf {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699
**[Test build #92577 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92577/testReport)**
for PR 21699 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669#discussion_r199935864
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/features/OptionRequirements.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/*
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21707
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21707
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92576/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21707
**[Test build #92576 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92576/testReport)**
for PR 21707 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21146
I guess leave a note about why the activation artifact is managed there.
Safer to keep it I guess. That artifact will almost surely not change.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92575/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21686
**[Test build #92575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92575/testReport)**
for PR 21686 at commit
Github user gsemet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Hi. I think until we get a core developer really interested in packaging
python dependencies correctly, this PR wonât evolve a lot
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21667
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92569/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21667
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
101 - 200 of 430 matches
Mail list logo
