Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
**[Test build #92907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92907/testReport)**
for PR 21589 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92911/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
**[Test build #92911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92911/testReport)**
for PR 21745 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21752#discussion_r201916394
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -717,4 +717,9 @@ class DataFrameAggregateSuite extends QueryTest
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21752#discussion_r201916183
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -717,4 +717,9 @@ class DataFrameAggregateSuite extends QueryTest
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21752#discussion_r201916132
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -717,4 +717,9 @@ class DataFrameAggregateSuite extends QueryTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21747
**[Test build #92914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92914/testReport)**
for PR 21747 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21156
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21752#discussion_r201915580
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameAggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -717,4 +717,9 @@ class DataFrameAggregateSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21156
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92909/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21156
**[Test build #92909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92909/testReport)**
for PR 21156 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21752
Can you describe the issue detail instead of the jira link?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
Actually, the very first time we introduce this bug was at
7463a88be6eecf14ba0a87048a975a06b03b928b. We added `!f.resolved &&` in
`ResolveMissingReferences` rule.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21749
@skonto perhaps you folks can give some guidance on this?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21749
agreed, it's not ideal to use reflection...
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21747
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21710
we could, but we tend to forget about them until the release, so I'd prefer
we don't and have everything in one PR.
not ideal, we could leave out code example, or maybe even vigenette,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21747
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21747
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92912/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21747
**[Test build #92912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92912/testReport)**
for PR 21747 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
I tried to checkout the commit 82183f7b57f2a93e646c56a9e37fac64b348ff0b
which is before AnalysisBarrier commit.
```scala
scala> val df = Seq(("test1", 0), ("test2", 1)).toDF("name",
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745#discussion_r201914482
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1163,7 +1165,8 @@ class Analyzer(
case
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21741
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92908/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21741
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201914125
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -435,3 +435,31 @@ setCheckpointDir <- function(directory) {
sc <- getSparkContext()
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21741
**[Test build #92908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92908/testReport)**
for PR 21741 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201913817
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -435,3 +435,31 @@ setCheckpointDir <- function(directory) {
sc <- getSparkContext()
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201913578
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -435,3 +435,31 @@ setCheckpointDir <- function(directory) {
sc <- getSparkContext()
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21753#discussion_r201912569
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/pivot.sql.out ---
@@ -192,3 +192,33 @@ struct<>
-- !query 12 output
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21753
Actually, this is a bug? In the current master, the exception says;
```
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException
Aggregate expression required for pivot, found 'CEIL(sum(cast(earnings#x as
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
We might need to get rid of AnalysisBarrier in the next release. This
already caused at least three regressions in 2.3
---
-
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r201904049
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -3261,3 +3261,322 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21667
**[Test build #92913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92913/testReport)**
for PR 21667 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21667
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21667
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/889/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21704#discussion_r201902635
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ case class
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
@gatorsmile It seems the AnalysisBarrier commit causes this error, so v2.2
does not have this issue;
```
scala> df.select(df("name")).filter(df("id") === 0).explain(true)
== Parsed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21747
**[Test build #92912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92912/testReport)**
for PR 21747 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21704#discussion_r201902242
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -610,27 +636,27 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21747
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21747
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
Sorry replying via email.
The previously failed test case has a GROUPING with resolved references.
Since it's unresolved itself, the rule will go through underlying Project
and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745#discussion_r201901412
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1163,7 +1165,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061
SGTM
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, 12:19 PM Takuya UESHIN
wrote:
> *@ueshin* commented on this pull request.
> --
>
> In
>
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745#discussion_r201900877
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1163,7 +1165,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21704#discussion_r201900374
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -533,15 +559,15 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21061#discussion_r201898932
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -3261,3 +3261,322 @@ case class
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21608
you'd be better to do that. cc: @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/888/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21745
**[Test build #92911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92911/testReport)**
for PR 21745 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92904/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21754
**[Test build #92910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92910/testReport)**
for PR 21754 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21754
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/887/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21700
**[Test build #92904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92904/testReport)**
for PR 21700 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21754
spark-2.2 and 2.3 has the same issue, so we probably need to backport this
fix there, too.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21754
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21754
[SPARK-24705][SQL] Cannot reuse an exchange operator with an adaptive
execution coordinator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed a bug to wrongly reuse an exchange
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92901/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21131
hmm, will we have a problem for shuffle here? Assuming a shuffle stage has
2 task sets, one is active, one is zombie. Both of them have running tasks.
If a task from zombie task set
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21753
**[Test build #92901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92901/testReport)**
for PR 21753 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21131
hmm, will we have a problem for shuffle here? Assuming a shuffle stage has
2 tasksets, one is zombie, one is normal. Both of them have running tasks.
if a task in zombie taskset finishes,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21719
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21719
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92906/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21719
**[Test build #92906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92906/testReport)**
for PR 21719 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18139
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21131
ah i see. Does it only apply to the result stage? IIRC shuffle stage tracks
shuffle epoch and will ignore the tasks from a killed stage.
---
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21741#discussion_r201889164
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -387,6 +389,82 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21542
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21741
**[Test build #92908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92908/testReport)**
for PR 21741 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21156
**[Test build #92909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92909/testReport)**
for PR 21156 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21741
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21741
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/886/
Github user yucai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21156
@maryannxue how about this way? Any better idea?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21542
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201887843
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -2336,6 +2336,18 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
LGTM otherwise
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201887513
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaSparkContext.scala ---
@@ -128,6 +128,18 @@ class JavaSparkContext(val sc: SparkContext)
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201887443
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -2336,6 +2336,18 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21719
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21719
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/885/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201887249
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -435,3 +435,31 @@ setCheckpointDir <- function(directory) {
sc <- getSparkContext()
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201887142
--- Diff: python/pyspark/context.py ---
@@ -406,6 +406,22 @@ def defaultMinPartitions(self):
"""
return
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589#discussion_r201887215
--- Diff: python/pyspark/context.py ---
@@ -406,6 +406,22 @@ def defaultMinPartitions(self):
"""
return
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21719
**[Test build #92906 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92906/testReport)**
for PR 21719 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
**[Test build #92907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/92907/testReport)**
for PR 21589 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21184#discussion_r201886545
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -284,6 +288,80 @@ class Analyzer(
}
}
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21131
>>Fetch failure lead to multiple tasksets which are active for a given
stage.
>How can this happen? the TaskSetManager will mark itself as zombie when it
receives a fetch failed.
We
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440
@mridulm @jerryshao maybe you would be interested in reviewing this as well?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21583
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21583
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/884/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21583
Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/884/
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21730
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
cc @jiangxb1987
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21751#discussion_r201879749
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -557,4 +558,21 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21736
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
1 - 100 of 677 matches
Mail list logo
