Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
test this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
retest please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93688/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21896
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93680/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21896
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
testing this change manually on the ubuntu-testing worker:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.6-ubuntu-test/878/
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21896
**[Test build #93680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93680/testReport)**
for PR 21896 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
**[Test build #93688 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93688/testReport)**
for PR 21650 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21894
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21894
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93672/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21886
cc @dilipbiswal Could you resolve the conflicts? I will start the review
after the rebase.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21894
**[Test build #93672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93672/testReport)**
for PR 21894 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
this is great, but i will have to manually test this on our ubuntu testing
worker. please do not merge until i confirm it works.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user d80tb7 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21901
[SPARK-24950][SQL] DateTimeUtilsSuite daysToMillis and millisToDays fails
w/java 8 181-b13
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Update DateTimeUtilsSuite so that when
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21886
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93677/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
> Is it possible to include the actual size of the in-memory table so far
in the msg as well?
Possibly. The state of the relation might be messy when I go to query its
size.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21886
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21318
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21318
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21886
**[Test build #93677 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93677/testReport)**
for PR 21886 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1425/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21894
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93675/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21894
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93694/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
**[Test build #93694 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93694/testReport)**
for PR 21900 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21894
**[Test build #93675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93675/testReport)**
for PR 21894 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93678/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21857
**[Test build #93678 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93678/testReport)**
for PR 21857 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1425/
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21318
**[Test build #93695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93695/testReport)**
for PR 21318 at commit
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21884
This needs a Spark ticket. I also don't think pods specifically have to
expose ports. My understanding was that the ports field on the pod was only to
assign ports names, so that the ports can be
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
**[Test build #93694 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93694/testReport)**
for PR 21900 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21318#discussion_r20582
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -39,7 +39,21 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
/**
- *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21895
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93676/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user lindblombr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21847
@gengliangwang I think I agree with your take on the multi-type unions in
principal. The only issue is that avro itself does support that as a valid use
case; however, when I think about the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21895
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21895
**[Test build #93676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93676/testReport)**
for PR 21895 at commit
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
@skonto can you try this with spark-rbacyaml?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user mccheah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21900
[SPARK-23146][K8S][TESTS] Don't set service account name for client mode
test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Don't set service account name for the pod created in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93670/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
**[Test build #93670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93670/testReport)**
for PR 21403 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20838
**[Test build #93693 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93693/testReport)**
for PR 20838 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20838
**[Test build #93692 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93692/testReport)**
for PR 20838 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
this looks good -- wondering about a couple of potential improvements. Is
it possible to include the actual size of the in-memory table so far in the msg
as well?
Also, does catching the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user pgandhi999 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809#discussion_r205878279
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -182,6 +198,15 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab, store:
Github user pgandhi999 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809#discussion_r205878301
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusStore.scala
---
@@ -112,10 +112,14 @@ private[spark] class AppStatusStore(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809
**[Test build #93689 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93689/testReport)**
for PR 21809 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
**[Test build #93690 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93690/testReport)**
for PR 21103 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21102
**[Test build #93691 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93691/testReport)**
for PR 21102 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21102
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21102
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21758#discussion_r205876806
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -359,20 +366,55 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21897
@rxin no, they should not have been public. IMO we should just hide them
for 3.0.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21897
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #93687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93687/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
**[Test build #93688 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93688/testReport)**
for PR 21650 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205872386
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,52 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user bersprockets opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
[SPARK-24912][SQL] Don't obscure source of OOM during broadcast join
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR shows the stack trace of the original OutOfMemoryError
Github user cclauss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20838#discussion_r205870627
--- Diff: dev/create-release/releaseutils.py ---
@@ -149,7 +152,11 @@ def get_commits(tag):
if not is_valid_author(author):
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205866645
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,61 @@ object
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205865029
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,61 @@ object
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842
Is this still a PR your working on? We've recently started adding PMML
support to Spark ML and it would be cool to have this in the ML side instead of
(or in addition to) the legacy Spark MLlib.
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842
Jenkins OK to test.
cc @MLnick
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20556
If your still working on this would be good to merge in the latest master
branch.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20556#discussion_r205862690
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -82,6 +87,34 @@ else
rm "$PYCODESTYLE_REPORT_PATH"
fi
+# Check python document style, skip check if
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20556#discussion_r205862781
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -82,6 +88,34 @@ else
rm "$PYCODESTYLE_REPORT_PATH"
fi
+# Check python document style, skip check if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21887
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21887
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93681/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21887
**[Test build #93681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93681/testReport)**
for PR 21887 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18457
So MLlib is even further into maintenance mode, do we want to take
improvement parity patches like these? cc @MLnick @jkbradley @HyukjinKwon ? I'm
leaning towards no and focusing on ML but it's a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93685/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21898
**[Test build #93685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93685/testReport)**
for PR 21898 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
**[Test build #93686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93686/testReport)**
for PR 21650 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21892
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93665/
Test PASSed.
---
201 - 300 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
