Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93671/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
**[Test build #93671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93671/testReport)**
for PR 21103 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21893
Mind filing a JIRA please? Please see
http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21893
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a
pull request.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
**[Test build #93671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93671/testReport)**
for PR 21103 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21879
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21879
Thanks! Merged to master/2.3/2.2
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21882#discussion_r205820575
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -183,6 +183,18 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650#discussion_r205819781
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -94,36 +95,61 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
**[Test build #93670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93670/testReport)**
for PR 21403 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
**[Test build #93669 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93669/testReport)**
for PR 21103 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93669/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103
**[Test build #93669 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93669/testReport)**
for PR 21103 at commit
Github user mn-mikke commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103#discussion_r205806876
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -3805,3 +3799,233 @@ object ArrayUnion
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21893
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21893
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user krisgeus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21893
Support selecting from partitioned tabels with partitions having different
data formats
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21893
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1401/
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
**[Test build #93668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93668/testReport)**
for PR 21650 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
Thanks! merging to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user pgandhi999 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809#discussion_r205782862
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -105,16 +105,29 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab, store:
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
@BryanCutler @HyukjinKwon I updated the PR based on Bryan's suggestion.
Please take a look and let me know if you have further comments.
Thanks!
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21650
**[Test build #93667 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93667/testReport)**
for PR 21650 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1401/
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21892
**[Test build #93665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93665/testReport)**
for PR 21892 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
**[Test build #93666 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93666/testReport)**
for PR 21584 at commit
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21892
@HyukjinKwon @maropu Please, take a look at the PR. Is it valid to just
count number of lines returned by Hadoop LineReader and do not call parser at
all? Maybe there are some corner cases when
GitHub user MaxGekk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21892
[SPARK-24945][SQL] Switching to uniVocity 2.7.2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to upgrade uniVocity parser from **2.6.3** to
**2.7.2**. The
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21892
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21892
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93661/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
**[Test build #93661 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93661/testReport)**
for PR 21802 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93664/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
**[Test build #93664 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93664/testReport)**
for PR 21584 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
**[Test build #93664 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93664/testReport)**
for PR 21584 at commit
Github user ifilonenko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
**[Test build #93663 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93663/testReport)**
for PR 21584 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93663/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93662/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
**[Test build #93662 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93662/testReport)**
for PR 21584 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
**[Test build #93663 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93663/testReport)**
for PR 21584 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
**[Test build #93662 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93662/testReport)**
for PR 21584 at commit
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809#discussion_r205752305
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -105,16 +105,29 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab, store:
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809#discussion_r205754677
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -182,6 +198,15 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab, store:
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809#discussion_r205755070
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusStore.scala
---
@@ -112,10 +112,14 @@ private[spark] class AppStatusStore(
}
Github user ifilonenko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748#discussion_r205752304
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/ClientModeTestsSuite.scala
---
@@
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21732
Again, can we always support `Option[Product]` with some special handling
for top-level encoder expression?
---
-
To
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21879
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93660/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21879
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21837
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93659/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21879
**[Test build #93660 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93660/testReport)**
for PR 21879 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21837
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21837
**[Test build #93659 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93659/testReport)**
for PR 21837 at commit
Github user dmateusp closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21706
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user dmateusp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21706
hey @HyukjinKwon thanks for coming back to me on this :)
I'll close the PR now, and start a thread later today on the dev mailing
list
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20405
I think this can be removed in favor of
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21822
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21850#discussion_r205737337
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -414,6 +414,9 @@ object SimplifyConditionals
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21854
regardless of the implementation, is it expected to produce different UUID
for different micro batches? Personally I think it's reasonable, micro batch
and continuous execution should produce
Github user bsikander commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21816
@vanzin Could you please have a look on this change?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user hejiefang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21844
OK. Sorry, I didn't know I could close it
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user hejiefang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21844
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21882
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21882#discussion_r205734835
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -183,6 +183,18 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21103#discussion_r205733831
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -3805,3 +3799,233 @@ object ArrayUnion
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21844
@hejiefang can you close this?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748#discussion_r205721972
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/ClientModeTestsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21631
@MaxGekk, thanks. mind opening a PR to upgrade?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
**[Test build #93661 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93661/testReport)**
for PR 21802 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21631
> do we still hit the bug when parsing csv data?
I have checked uniVocity 2.7.2, there is no problem on this version.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21826#discussion_r205713034
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/PredicateSuite.scala
---
@@ -455,4 +456,10 @@ class PredicateSuite
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802
Looks good to me too
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802#discussion_r205704109
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2382,6 +2382,20 @@ def array_sort(col):
return
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802#discussion_r205703558
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -3545,6 +3545,14 @@ object functions {
*/
def array_max(e:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21802#discussion_r205703459
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -1184,6 +1184,110 @@ case class
401 - 500 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
