Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94849/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22081
**[Test build #94849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94849/testReport)**
for PR 22081 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20725
i've been having trouble getting this build to pass, and i'm testing a few
other modules on top of yours. if i have problems, i'll revert the extraneous
changes and build yours.
---
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20725
https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/ubuntuSparkPRB/80/
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94859/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
**[Test build #94859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94859/testReport)**
for PR 22121 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20725
ugh hang on. lemme fix that crap. (this is on a testing branch in my
personal spark form)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21909#discussion_r210693829
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -2223,21 +2223,31 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20725
https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/ubuntuSparkPRB/79/
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22120
Is this really necessary? It will always be "1", since client-mode apps are
not re-tried (the YARN AM might be, but the driver is not). That makes it not
really useful.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user edwinalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r210691276
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +69,11 @@ package object config {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21909
**[Test build #94860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94860/testReport)**
for PR 21909 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
**[Test build #94859 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94859/testReport)**
for PR 22121 at commit
Github user edwinalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r210690505
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -216,8 +217,7 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
def stop(): Unit
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
Tests pass now. This comment
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104/files#r210414941 requires some
attention. @cloud-fan Do you think this is the right way to handle
GenericInternalRow
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21858#discussion_r210681673
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/MonotonicallyIncreasingID.scala
---
@@ -80,7 +80,5 @@ case class
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20725
@shaneknapp would you mind kicking off a test on one of the workers with
python 3.5 and pyarrow 0.10.0 to verify this PR is passing under that env?
Sorry for the special request, this should be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94848/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20725#discussion_r210679722
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -4331,13 +4354,22 @@ def test_createDataFrame_fallback_enabled(self):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
**[Test build #94848 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94848/testReport)**
for PR 22104 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94858/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22119
How do users manually migrate and keep compatibility?That is the
problem I have, I am all for reverting, if we have an easy way for users to
migrate to the internal one.
Note that
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
**[Test build #94858 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94858/testReport)**
for PR 22112 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
@gatorsmile Thank you for your reply. Could you elaborate on your
suggestion?
>A general suggestion. To avoid introducing the regressions, how about
implementing a new one without changing the
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22119
But it seems that creating a configuration makes everyone happy...
I will wait for another day to get more thoughts.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
**[Test build #94858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94858/testReport)**
for PR 22112 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22119
@tgravescs I saw your comments. Just feel that we can make it simpler by
reverting it.
For hive tables that used Databricks spark-avro, the tables can still using
the Databricks
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
**[Test build #94857 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94857/testReport)**
for PR 22112 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94857/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
**[Test build #94856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94856/testReport)**
for PR 22112 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94856/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21909#discussion_r210666117
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -1492,6 +1492,15 @@ object SQLConf {
"This usually
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
**[Test build #94857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94857/testReport)**
for PR 22112 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user MaxGekk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899#discussion_r210664024
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/BroadcastExchangeExec.scala
---
@@ -118,12 +119,19 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22101
the added tests are good. This is pretty nit-picky, but looking at the
whole test suite, are there any tests that check for anything other than the
first byte (or array length)? Seems the longer
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94855/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
**[Test build #94855 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94855/testReport)**
for PR 22112 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
**[Test build #94856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94856/testReport)**
for PR 22112 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94852/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22122
**[Test build #94852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94852/testReport)**
for PR 22122 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
> I would propose we fix the things that are using the round robin type
partitioning (repartition) but then unordered things like zip/MapPartitions
(via user code) we document or perhaps give the
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22098
oh wow, nice find @HyukjinKwon! code archaeology ftw! :)
anyways: that PR went through about a week after i started here @ the
amplab and i don't think i even had access to the build
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
**[Test build #94855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94855/testReport)**
for PR 22112 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
@HyukjinKwon I am worrying about the design of a mixture of representation
s"" and code""? When the design is not good, it is hard to maintain it and add
new code based on this. Let @cloud-fan
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22123
**[Test build #94854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94854/testReport)**
for PR 22123 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22123
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22123
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user koertkuipers opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22123
[SPARK-25134][SQL] Csv column pruning with checking of headers throws
incorrect error
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When column pruning is turned on the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22122
Are they all instances to fix?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21950
**[Test build #94853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94853/testReport)**
for PR 21950 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22122
**[Test build #94852 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94852/testReport)**
for PR 22122 at commit
GitHub user xuanyuanking opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22122
[SPARK-24665][PySpark][FollowUp] Use SQLConf in PySpark to manage all sql
configs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow up for SPARK-24665, find some others hard
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21950
restest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
lgtm, just a small reword in one of the msgs suggested by maxgekk.
@hvanhovell @gatorsmile would you like to review this as well?
---
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899#discussion_r210647464
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/BroadcastExchangeExec.scala
---
@@ -118,12 +119,19 @@ case class
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899#discussion_r210645167
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/BroadcastExchangeExec.scala
---
@@ -118,12 +119,19 @@ case class
Github user redsanket commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21402
@Victsm @vanzin i want to get this going, is it better if I have a PR up
with the requested changes and concerns?
---
-
To
Github user deshanxiao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94850/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
can you please close this pr @deshanxiao ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
**[Test build #94850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94850/testReport)**
for PR 22121 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22117
**[Test build #94851 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94851/testReport)**
for PR 22117 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22117
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22117
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22117
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
**[Test build #94850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94850/testReport)**
for PR 22121 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22121
[SPARK-25133][SQL][Doc]AVRO data source guide
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Create documentation for AVRO data source.
The new page will be linked in
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22112
Personally I don't want to talk about implementation until we decide what
we want our semantics to be around the unordered operations because that
affects any implementation.
If we are
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22031
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22031
Thanks! merging to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user bsikander commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21816
@holdenk somehow, Jenkins didn't execute the tests.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22081
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22081
**[Test build #94849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94849/testReport)**
for PR 22081 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
**[Test build #94848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94848/testReport)**
for PR 22104 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22120#discussion_r210599272
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +62,10 @@
201 - 300 of 440 matches
Mail list logo