Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22357
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22357
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95950/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22357
**[Test build #95950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95950/testReport)**
for PR 22357 at commit
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r216788096
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -414,9 +425,48 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r216788079
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -414,9 +425,48 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r216788016
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -623,8 +623,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22391#discussion_r216786657
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/VectorAssemblerSuite.scala ---
@@ -147,4 +147,12 @@ class VectorAssemblerSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95946/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #95946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95946/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386
**[Test build #95961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95961/testReport)**
for PR 22386 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386
LGTM. Just one super nit.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386#discussion_r216781599
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStoreRDD.scala
---
@@ -74,9 +75,14 @@ class StateStoreRDD[T: ClassTag,
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22357
LGTM.
Thank you all for participating the discussion. @cloud-fan and @gatorsmile,
do you have any further comment? If not, I would like to merge it tomorrow into
both master and rc branch
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22396
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user sujith71955 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22396
@gatorsmile @srowen
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22396
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22396
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user sujith71955 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22396
[SPARK-23425][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Support wildcards in HDFS path for loadtable
command.
What changes were proposed in this pull request
Updated the Migration guide for the behavior changes
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22357#discussion_r216776055
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaPruning.scala
---
@@ -110,7 +110,17 @@ private[sql]
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22289
> I failed to find documentation about the RM adding its own Hadoop config
files to the AM/executors' classpath
See `Client.getYarnAppClasspath` and `Client.getMRAppClasspath`.
>
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20611#discussion_r216771752
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -303,94 +303,44 @@ case class LoadDataCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #95960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95960/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22242
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95943/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #95943 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95943/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95942/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22341
There was a trivial conflict in 2.3, I fixed it manually.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #95942 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95942/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386
**[Test build #95959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95959/testReport)**
for PR 22386 at commit
Github user henryr closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22211
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user henryr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22211
Merged to 2.1
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22394
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22394
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95952/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22394
**[Test build #95952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95952/testReport)**
for PR 22394 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22341
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22341
Merging to master, 2.4 and 2.3.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22394
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22394
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95951/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22394
**[Test build #95951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95951/testReport)**
for PR 22394 at commit
Github user mukulmurthy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386#discussion_r216750746
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStoreRDD.scala
---
@@ -74,9 +74,14 @@ class StateStoreRDD[T:
Github user mukulmurthy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386
> ```
> If a continuous processing job runs and the same thread gets reused for a
microbatch execution job in the same environment
> ```
> Little confuse about this scenario, could
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21649
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95956/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21649
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21649
**[Test build #95956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95956/testReport)**
for PR 21649 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18304
Is this still valid, @cse68197 and @HyukjinKwon ?
#18581 is superceded by #20727 . And #20727 seems to be merged. Are we
waiting for the others?
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22337
**[Test build #95958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95958/testReport)**
for PR 22337 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22337
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22337
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22337
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22364
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22364
**[Test build #95957 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95957/testReport)**
for PR 22364 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22364
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22364
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22341#discussion_r216741392
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/LiveEntity.scala ---
@@ -538,6 +538,10 @@ private class LiveRDD(val info: RDDInfo) extends
LiveEntity
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22337
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95938/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22337
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95940/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22390#discussion_r216739580
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -263,10 +263,12 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22337
**[Test build #95938 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95938/testReport)**
for PR 22337 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21596
**[Test build #95940 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95940/testReport)**
for PR 21596 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22384
Looks fine.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288
Ok I looked at jiras, and this looks it also covers SPARK-15815, right? you
could add that to the summary too.
You mention some future improvements:
> Taking into account static
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22213
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22364
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95944/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22364
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user MaxGekk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22379#discussion_r216734651
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3720,3 +3720,22 @@ setMethod("current_timestamp",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22364
**[Test build #95944 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95944/testReport)**
for PR 22364 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22213
Merging to master / 2.4.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22348
Thank you for experiment, @SongYadong . IMO, if the gain is not obvious, we
had better keep the current proven one because new one can introduce some
future regressions (or even bugs).
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22341
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22341
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95937/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20611#discussion_r216732765
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -303,94 +303,44 @@ case class LoadDataCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22341
**[Test build #95937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95937/testReport)**
for PR 22341 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22387
Since this is merged, could you close this PR, @wangyum ?
Thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22295
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22295
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95953/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22295
**[Test build #95953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95953/testReport)**
for PR 22295 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22387
Merged to branch-2.3.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386#discussion_r216730172
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStoreRDD.scala
---
@@ -74,9 +74,14 @@ class StateStoreRDD[T:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22390
**[Test build #95955 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95955/testReport)**
for PR 22390 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22374
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22374
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95939/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jose-torres commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386#discussion_r216728848
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousExecution.scala
---
@@ -391,6 +393,7 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22395
`[SQ]` -> `[SQL]` in the title?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22374
**[Test build #95939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95939/testReport)**
for PR 22374 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21649
**[Test build #95956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95956/testReport)**
for PR 21649 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21649
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21649
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r216724373
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -414,9 +425,48 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r216725731
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -414,9 +425,48 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r216723175
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -414,9 +425,48 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r216726755
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -623,8 +623,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22288#discussion_r216726323
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -414,9 +425,48 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user sujith71955 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20611#discussion_r216728326
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -303,94 +303,44 @@ case class LoadDataCommand(
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22386
```
If a continuous processing job runs and the same thread gets reused for a
microbatch execution job in the same environment
```
Little confuse about this scenario, could you
Github user huaxingao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21649#discussion_r216727458
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -3939,7 +3929,15 @@ setMethod("hint",
signature(x = "SparkDataFrame", name = "character"),
201 - 300 of 628 matches
Mail list logo
