Github user LantaoJin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22411
Using pattern matching will face a problem.
```InsertIntoHiveDirCommand```,```CreateHiveTableAsSelectCommand``` and
```InsertIntoHiveTable``` are all in spark-hive module. SparkPlanInfo could not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22447
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22447
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96166/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22447
**[Test build #96166 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96166/testReport)**
for PR 22447 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441#discussion_r218304237
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -111,13 +111,17 @@ fi
# different versions of Scala are supported.
BASE_PROFILES="-Pmesos
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441
**[Test build #96168 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96168/testReport)**
for PR 22441 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441#discussion_r218304060
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -183,8 +188,17 @@ if [[ "$1" == "package" ]]; then
# Updated for each binary build
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22429#discussion_r218303899
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -99,10 +99,11 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* by
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441#discussion_r218303693
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -111,13 +111,17 @@ fi
# different versions of Scala are supported.
Github user LantaoJin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22411
Agree that. Since this field is important to us. Could I refactor it
following your advice and file a discussion in another Jira?
---
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441#discussion_r218301766
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -111,13 +111,17 @@ fi
# different versions of Scala are supported.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441
**[Test build #96167 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96167/testReport)**
for PR 22441 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96163/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22441
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
**[Test build #96163 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96163/testReport)**
for PR 22402 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96165/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
**[Test build #96165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96165/testReport)**
for PR 22402 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96164/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
**[Test build #96164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96164/testReport)**
for PR 17400 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408#discussion_r218295350
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1879,6 +1879,80 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22411
Since this is a new feature, we can't just merge it like #22353 without a
proper design.
Making the event logs as a structured, unified and reliable source for
Spark metrics looks like a
Github user LantaoJin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22411
Most of the information we wanted could be analyzed out from event log
except some metrics in Executor side which doesn't heartbeat to Driver, e.g RPC
count with NameNode. Another case is #21221,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22443#discussion_r218293821
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/FilterPushdownBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -17,29 +17,28 @@
package
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22443#discussion_r218293752
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/FilterPushdownBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -17,29 +17,28 @@
package
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403#discussion_r218293687
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/in-basic.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22420#discussion_r218293704
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLAppStatusListener.scala
---
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ class SQLAppStatusListener(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403#discussion_r218293670
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/in-basic.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user jianjianjiao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22444#discussion_r218292773
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -465,20 +475,31 @@ private[history] class
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22138
Now vote for Spark 2.4 is in progress. If we are not in stand-by mode for
any blocker issues for Spark 2.4 RC, I'd be really happy if someone could
revisit this and continue reviewing.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22439
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22439
Thanks! merging to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user suryag10 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22433
> Agreed with @mridulm that the naming restriction is specific to k8s and
should be handled in a k8s specific way, e.g., somewhere around
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22447
**[Test build #96166 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96166/testReport)**
for PR 22447 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22447
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22447
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user maryannxue opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22447
[SPARK-25450][SQL] PushProjectThroughUnion rule uses the same exprId for
project expressions in each Union child, causing mistakes in constant
propagation
## What changes were proposed in this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22381
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96159/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22381
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22381
**[Test build #96159 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96159/testReport)**
for PR 22381 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
Yes. I can't find more references to the old JDK docs also.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22395
Looks like a use case for a legacy config.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:41 PM Wenchen Fan
wrote:
> To clarify, it's not following hive, but following the behavior of
> previous
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
Some references to Java 7, Some references to Java 6.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96155/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
**[Test build #96155 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96155/testReport)**
for PR 22305 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22418#discussion_r218282733
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -50,6 +55,66 @@ abstract class OrcSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
**[Test build #96165 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96165/testReport)**
for PR 22402 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22418#discussion_r218281814
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -50,6 +55,66 @@ abstract class OrcSuite
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22438
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22418#discussion_r218281581
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -50,6 +55,66 @@ abstract class OrcSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
**[Test build #96164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96164/testReport)**
for PR 17400 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
**[Test build #96163 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96163/testReport)**
for PR 22402 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96160/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22402
**[Test build #96160 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96160/testReport)**
for PR 22402 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
Are these all the references to Java 7 docs?
Also, does the advice need a bit of updating since we require Java 8?
around GC?
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22438
thanks, merging to master/2.4!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96161/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
**[Test build #96161 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96161/testReport)**
for PR 17400 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22414
Plz do not change the format: `Problem` -> `What changes were proposed in
this pull request?`.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22414#discussion_r218280823
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/TimeWindowSuite.scala
---
@@ -122,6 +123,51 @@ class TimeWindowSuite
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22414#discussion_r218280792
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/TimeWindow.scala
---
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ case class TimeWindow(
with
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
cc @srowen
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22444#discussion_r218279175
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -465,20 +475,31 @@ private[history] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96162/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
**[Test build #96162 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96162/testReport)**
for PR 22446 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96158/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
**[Test build #96158 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96158/testReport)**
for PR 22305 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22395
To clarify, it's not following hive, but following the behavior of previous
Spark versions, which is same as hive.
I also think returning left operand's type is more reasonable, but we
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
**[Test build #96162 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96162/testReport)**
for PR 22446 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22355
cc: @gatorsmile @rednaxelafx Could you check again and merge?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400#discussion_r218277145
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/AliasAwareOutputPartitioning.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
GitHub user wangyum opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22446
[SPARK-19550][DOC][FOLLOW-UP] Update tuning.md to use JDK8
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update `tuning.md` and `building-spark.md` to use JDK8.
## How was
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96156/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305
**[Test build #96156 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96156/testReport)**
for PR 22305 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22418#discussion_r218272427
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -50,6 +55,66 @@ abstract class OrcSuite
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22418#discussion_r218271729
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -50,6 +55,66 @@ abstract class OrcSuite
Github user ptkool closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22445
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
GitHub user ptkool opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22445
Branch 2.3 udf nullability
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22429
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96154/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22429
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22429
**[Test build #96154 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96154/testReport)**
for PR 22429 at commit
1 - 100 of 501 matches
Mail list logo
